Nov 17, 2021 · If elected, the DA’s Office I run in Chatham and Orange Counties will not seek the death penalty. I’m making this decision because the death penalty goes against the values I hold and because of what I’ve learned in my 16 years of experience in the court system. Here’s why I’m against the death penalty:
May 29, 2021 · The district attorney's office did not comment. Harris noted that prosecutors had earlier said the family supported again seeking the death penalty, and contended that their new motion is a gambit ...
Aug 12, 2021 · Henry County Commonwealth’s Attorney Andrew Nester said Tuesday he intends to seek the death penalty in the case. A grand jury recently indicted 42-year-old Callaway of two counts of capital ...
The Advocates for Human Rights opposes the use of the death penalty anywhere and everywhere. We serve on the Steering Committee of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, an alliance of more than 160 NGOs, bar associations, local authorities, and unions from around the globe.
Supreme Court case law allows states to deny individuals court-appointed counsel at the state post-conviction level. The U.S. Supreme Court has never recognized a constitutional right to counsel for indigent death row inmates seeking post-conviction relief in state or federal court.
According to James Pitkin (2008) “Advocates of the death penalty argue that it deters crime, is a good tool for police and prosecutors (in plea bargaining for example), makes sure that convicted criminals do not offend again and is a just penalty for atrocious crimes such as child murders, serial killers or torture ...
One of the biggest predictors of who gets sentenced to death has nothing to do with relevant factors such as the heinousness of the crime, the culpability of the accused, or the life history of the accused. Rather, the quality of the lawyer representing the accused very often predicts who lives and who dies.Mar 10, 2010
A: No, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long terms of imprisonment. States that have death penalty laws do not have lower crime rates or murder rates than states without such laws.
Right to Counsel for Indigent Criminal Defendants Alabama (1932) secured the right to an attorney for indigent capital defendants, and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) extended that right to all indigent criminal defendants at the trial level.
The American Civil Liberties Union believes the death penalty inherently violates the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law. ... The death penalty is uncivilized in theory and unfair and inequitable in practice.
More than 185 people who were sentenced to death in the United States have been exonerated and released since 1973, with official misconduct and perjury/false accusation the leading causes of their wrongful convictions.
Much to the surprise of many who, logically, would assume that shortening someone's life should be cheaper than paying for it until natural expiration, it turns out that it is actually cheaper to imprison someone for life than to execute them. In fact, it is almost 10 times cheaper!
Ethical Issues The American justice system requires that the prosecutor prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. ... This means that criminal defense attorneys are required to do their best to advocate for their clients, even if the attorney believes the client is guilty.
Prosecutors are the most powerful officials in the American criminal justice system. The decisions they make, particularly the charging and plea-bargaining decisions, control the operation of the system and often predetermine the outcome of criminal cases.
Evidence, such as a statement, tending to excuse, justify, or absolve the alleged fault or guilt of a defendant.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California district attorney said in a court filing Friday that she won’t seek a new death sentence against Scott Peterson, convicted in 2005 of murdering his pregnant wife.
The district attorney’s office did not comment. Harris noted that prosecutors had earlier said the family supported again seeking the death penalty, and contended that their new motion is a gambit to avoid a new airing of the case.
One of Peterson’s attorneys said the announcement is not a precursor to a plea deal and that his client will seek a new trial if a judge decides his first one was tainted by juror misconduct. Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo said she hopes to make a decision this year whether Peterson merits a new trial.