The answer is: Yes, you can sue your financial advisor. You can file an arbitration claim to seek financial compensation when an advisor – or the b...
STOCK MARKET CRASH NOTICE: The Sonn Law Group has spoken to folks who’ve suffered extreme losses due to the recent stock market crash that is relat...
Stockbrokers and financial advisors fail to live up to their professional duties in a variety of ways. In some cases, investor lawsuits and arbitra...
If you have lost a large amount of money in an investment, you know how awful it feels. It is stressful, frustrating, and worse yet, it can be fina...
In many cases, investors are not technically eligible to file a lawsuit against their stockbroker or financial advisor. This is because the overwhe...
It is also right that the responsible party is held accountable. However, under U.S. federal securities law and FINRA regulations, investors cannot hold brokers legally liable simply because they lost money.
Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification. Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades.
Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile.
If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
This means that you will be required to seek compensation through the FINRA arbitration process. The good news is that FINRA arbitration is much like a mini-trial. If your arbitration claim is successful, you may be issued a FINRA arbitration award that includes financial compensation for the full value of your losses.
Advisor should respect a client’s right to sell, and respect any change in a customers’ tolerance for risk, such as when a client wants to cut their losses short. The stock market crash may not be over, and could be deeper and larger than it is right now.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your RIA must always look out for your best interests.
If they fail in any of their legal duties, investors can often sue to recover their losses ...
Financial advisors, stock brokers, and financial planners are required by law to responsibly invest their clients’ money and refrain from committing fraud, misleading their clients, or charging excessive fees. If they fail in any of their legal duties, investors can often sue to recover their losses against the broker, as well as the firm where the advisor works.
Financial advisor and stock broker misconduct is not uncommon; in a typical year, investors claim over $2 billion in losses due to financial advisor fraud and misconduct. Various state and federal laws make it illegal for financial advisors and brokers to commit fraud, or to handle investors’ funds negligently.
Most financial advisor and stock broker contracts require arbitration to resolve disputes, and limit an investor’s ability to file a lawsuit in court. Arbitration proceedings are held in front of a single arbitrator or small panel of arbitrators who, similar to a judge in court, decide the outcome of a dispute.
If you think your broker took advantage of you or a family member, there are steps you can immediately take to fight back: Don’t delay. Every legal claim has a certain amount of time in which you must file a lawsuit (known as a “statute of limitations”).
If you don’t act within that time period, you may lose your ability to sue your broker.
Reacting rapidly when you discover a possible fraud is incredibly important because the passage of time may affect your rights. Financial statements, stock trades, customer agreements, emails, and other correspondence with your broker could be relevant and useful.
If you are still not satisfied with the firm’s response, you can file a complaint with FINRA. Through its Complaint Program, FINRA investigates complaints against brokerage firms and their employees. FINRA is empowered to take disciplinary actions against brokers and their firms.
Building a legal strategy that maximizes your ability to recover. One of the most fundamental ways an attorney can assist you is by helping to determine whether you have grounds for filing a complaint.
The FINRA website is the fastest, simplest, and most reliable starting point from which to file a complaint. To begin the process of filing a FINRA complaint, follow these six steps: 1 Navigate to the FINRA website, or FINRA (dot) org. 2 Hover over the “Have a Problem?” link in the header, then click on “File a Complaint” in the dropdown menu. This will bring you to a new page. 3 Click the “How to File a Complaint” link. Again, a new page will open. 4 Scroll down until you see two red buttons. Click the button that says “File Online Complaint” for fastest processing. It may take a few moments for the complaint form to load. 5 Complete the first page of the form with as much detail as possible. Do not submit any false information. 6 Follow the prompts to complete the rest of the online complaint filing process.
If you believe that you, your husband or wife, or your small business has been financially harmed because your financial advisor committed fraud or deliberately acted against your best interests, it may be appropriate to file a formal complaint.
The purpose of FINRA, which monitors more than 630,000 individual brokers and over 3,700 securities firms nationwide, is to help oversee and enforce compliance with financial industry regulations among members.
One of the most fundamental ways an attorney can assist you is by helping to determine whether you have grounds for filing a complaint. Depending on the circumstances, it may be appropriate to file a FINRA complaint, ...
One of the most fundamental ways an attorney can assist you is by helping to determine whether you have grounds for filing a complaint. Depending on the circumstances, it may be appropriate to file a FINRA complaint, or even take more aggressive actions, if you experienced any of the following issues with your financial advisor or stockbroker: ...
As a first step, we must determine whether the client had a loss which is either not covered or which is inadequately covered.
The law says that the broker is not the client’s risk manager. The broker is not a mind reader. Essentially, he has to act upon the information and orders given by the client.
Generally, the insurance broker will claim as his defense that he was a mere order taker. For example, the broker will claim that the insured simply requested $500,000 of fire insurance and that there was no discussion about acquiring flood insurance – even though the client’s home is in a well-known flood zone, such as Long Beach.
A client should be aware that the insurance broker has various defenses that he may attempt to use.
The insurance broker can be held liable for failing to obtain the proper insurance for his client. The insurance broker can be held responsible under either negligence or breach of contract.
One of the common reasons for financial advisor malpractice is the sale of investment products that are not suitable or were improperly sold to investors. Recently there have been many cases investors that purchased products that they didn’t understand the risks and were not traded on the exchanges.
Under the Act, the SEC must approve all FINRA rules, policies, practices, and interpretations before they are implemented, including the FINRA rules at issue in this matter. See 15 U.S.C. §78s (b). Separate and apart from any regulatory functions, FINRA also operates an Office of Dispute Resolution.
For most investors, they are limited to filing claims against the financial advisor or firm through the Financial Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA is a self-regulatory organization that is responsible for the registration, regulation, and enforcement of rules for the investment brokerage industry.
Call us today at 1-800-856-3352 for a free portfolio review. In most cases, suing or filing a FINRA cause of action against a financial advisor or investment advisors is done by investment fraud attorneys.
FINRA is a self-regulatory organization (“SRO”) registered with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as a national securities association and the nation’s only registered securities association as well as the nation’s largest SRO.
FINRA customer dispute claims are often an attractive option for investors. These claims do not involve depositions, and are typically, faster, more efficient, and less expensive than many alternative forums available.
In many or most cases, the broker will deny absolutely everything with arguments that will make your own blood either boil or freeze. The defenses will range from blaming you, the market or both, to distorting the figures or the laws, the logic or anything else that shifts the liability for the losses away from the broker.
If the broker genuinely believes you were mistaken, they would explain why, backing this up with the appropriate evidence and financial and/or legal evidence.
The unstated and sole objective of the broker is to avoid (or evade) liability by any means available.
A financial damages claim is not for the fainthearted, but it may be worth it in the end. Make sure you think things through very carefully before the cost "clock" starts ticking away, and bear in mind that you will probably not get objective advice from a lawyer who is keen to sell (or missell) litigation.
Either way, the unfortunate reality is that litigation is an investment in itself, with its own risks and rewards. There are substantial costs involved, both financial and non-financial. All these factors need to be weighed up in advance and a sensible decision made. In some cases, it is better to live with the losses.
The theory is that judges are infallible and if you lose, you were in the wrong, deserve no damages and should, therefore, pay the costs of the other side.
It simply makes sense to sue them all at one time. If you have any doubt about who to name as a defendant, you may need to perform some basic factual investigation and legal research. You could also hire an attorney to advise you on the limited issue of who to sue. Click to visit Lawyers and Legal Help and Law Libraries.
You can sue more than one defendant for the same incident or contract. But each defendant must have some actual interest in the subject of your case and must be (at least arguably) responsible somehow for your injury .
In your case, both husband and wife would need to be named as defendants. They both have an ownership interest in the land. They both have the right to protect their ownership interest. And if one of them is not involved, the court could not make a clear and final decision about who actually owns the land.
Generally speaking, a defendant is necessary if the court will be unable to make a complete determination of the controversy if the person is absent from the case. For example, pretend you are suing because there is a dispute about a piece of land that you thought you purchased from a husband and wife.
When you give your attorney money -- or when your attorney obtains money on your behalf -- that transaction comes with legal and ethical obligations. In any kind of legal case, from a civil lawsuit to criminal proceedings, an attorney has certain fiduciary obligations when it comes to client funds or property the attorney receives in the course ...
First, the attorney has a duty to keep the client's funds or property secure and separate from the attorney's (and from the firm's) own funds and property. Second, the attorney must notify the client of the receipt of any funds or property intended for the client.
The client trust or escrow account is usually just a separate bank account that is opened and maintained by the attorney or firm, and which is dedicated solely to money received from and intended for clients. In some states, attorneys have discretion about whether to deposit client funds in interest-bearing bank accounts, ...
In any kind of legal case, from a civil lawsuit to criminal proceedings, an attorney has certain fiduciary obligations when it comes to client funds or property the attorney receives in the course of representing his or her client.
No commingling of funds is allowed. Typically, the only firm-affiliated money that is permitted in a “client trust” or “escrow” account is money deposited to cover fees charged by the financial institution that services the account.
The Internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent through this site could be intercepted or read by third parties. First, the attorney has a duty to keep the client's funds or property secure and separate from the attorney's (and from the firm's) own funds and property. Second, the attorney must notify the client of the receipt ...
To successfully sue a used car dealer, you must be able to prove that: 1 you suffered a financial loss (this is not hard if you had to pay for repairs), and 2 the dealer is legally responsible for your damages.
the dealer is legally responsible for your damages. This second point is often harder to prove. Almost surely, the used car dealer will testify that he or she had no way of knowing how long a ten-year-old Dodge would last and that, for this very reason, the car was sold "as is.". The dealer will then show the judge the written contract ...
To successfully sue a used car dealer, you must be able to prove that: you suffered a financial loss (this is not hard if you had to pay for repairs), and. the dealer is legally responsible for your damages. This second point is often harder to prove. Almost surely, the used car dealer will testify that he or she had no way ...
Argue fraud. If the car broke almost immediately after you took it out of the used car lot, you can file in small claims court and argue that you were defrauded. Your theory is that, no matter what the written contract said, there was a clear implication that you purchased a car, not a junk heap. When the dealer produces ...