what knid of attorney is in 12 angry men

What is 1212 Angry Men about?

12 Angry Men is a Hollywood-based movie about the American legal system. It’s a production that aims to explain legal regulations and society was directed by Sidney Lumet in 1957. In this legal system, a jury consists of twelve civilians who don’t know each other and have a clean criminal record.

What was the legal issue in 12 Angry Men?

In the movie 12 Angry Men, there were several legal and factual issues. One involved the credibility of the witnesses. One of the witnesses, an old man who lived on the second floor beneath the murder scene said he heard the boy say to his father, “I’m gonna kill you.”

Who is seven in the Twelve Angry Men?

He cowers under… read analysis of Five A ridiculous man whose “guilty” vote seems to rest more on indifference than prejudice. Seven is the juror who continuously expresses a desire to wrap up the process quickly and leave. He is loud and… read analysis of Seven Get the entire Twelve Angry Men LitChart as a printable PDF.

What is the best book about the jury in Twelve Angry Men?

Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (2003). "One Inspiring Jury [Review of 'Twelve Angry Men']". Michigan Law Review. 101 (6): 1387–1407. doi: 10.2307/3595316. JSTOR 3595316. In depth analysis compared with research on actual jury behaviour. Munyan, Russ (2000). Readings on Twelve Angry Men. Greenhaven Press. ISBN 978-0-7377-0313-9. Chandler, David (2005).

See more

How is justice shown in the 12 Angry Men?

Justice is shaped by truth in 'Twelve Angry Men', as the Jurors begin to understand the reasonable doubt in the evidence against the defendant, as the truth becomes prevalent through the Juror's deductive capabilities, thus allowing for injustice to be hindered by the truth, which ultimately leads justice to prevail in ...

What are the occupations of the jurors in 12 Angry Men?

All but two are identified by job or profession: Juror #1, called "High School Football Coach", Juror #2, called "Bank Teller", Juror #3, called "Beck & Call" and "Owns Messenger Service", Juror #4, called "Stock Broker", Juror #6, called "Painter", Juror #7, called "Salesman", Juror #8, called "Architect", Juror #10, ...

What was the crime tried in 12 Angry Men?

"12 Angry Men" focuses on a jury's deliberations in a capital murder case. A 12-man jury is sent to begin deliberations in the first-degree murder trial of an 18-year old Puerto Rican boy accused in the stabbing death of his father, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence.

What are the charges against the defendant 12 Angry Men?

We enter a courthouse and see twelve men sitting in a jury box. The judge gives them instructions to reach a ruling on a trial for first-degree murder. The accused is an eighteen year-old kid who's been charged with murdering his dad, and all of the jurors seem pretty convinced that he did it.

Is Juror number 1 the foreman?

Juror #1 seems like a soft-spoken person who's willing to assert himself when he needs to. He makes a decent effort at trying to keep the other jurors in order because as Juror #1, he is also the jury's foreman and is responsible for keeping the group under control.

What is juror 9s job?

They move the story along and provide conflict material and event development. In 12 Angry Men, Juror 9 is a minor character who provides an important element to the story.

Why does Juror 3 want the boy to be guilty?

Juror 3 has a son that he hasn't spoken to in 3 years, so he is anxious to blame 'rotten kids' for all the problems that exist in the world. He was ashamed when his son was 8 and walked away from a fight, so he rode him hard to 'make a man out of him.

Is the boy in 12 Angry Men guilty?

In the end, the teen is found not guilty, and the jurors go their separate ways; the thunderstorm that has been building throughout the film passes, the clouds break, the music swells, and we turn off the film content that justice was done.

Why is it called 12 Angry Men?

But the title screams "Conflict!" and tells the audience that there are at least twelve personalities who could affect the outcome of the plot. Chances are that screenplay writer Reginald Rose chose the title because it suggests action and suspense. At least that's how this old movie poster tries to spin it.

Why is the boy innocent in the 12 Angry Men?

The knife was found in his father's chest, but the fingerprints are left unfound. In the play, “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, the jury made the right decision to acquit the boy of the murder case because of the discussion of the evidence and of the reenactments of several scenes of the murder.

Why is Juror 5 convinced that the boy did not stab his father?

Why is Five convinced that the boy did not stab his father? What makes Five an authority? He's convinced because the boy is an experienced knife fighter and from the wound they had stabbed downward which makes him convinced the boy didn't do it.

Who voted not guilty in 12 Angry Men?

Juror 8Eleven men vote “guilty.” Only one man – Juror 8 – votes “not guilty.” The rest of the jurors are shocked, but Juror 8 says that he couldn't sentence a boy to death without discussing it first. It is revealed that the defendant is a 16-year-old boy charged with murdering his father.

Who is the most influential juror in 12 Angry Men?

Juror #8. He votes “not guilty” during the jury's first vote. Described as "thoughtful" and "gentle," Juror #8 is usually portrayed as the most heroic member of the jury.

What does Juror 3 look like?

Juror 3 can be described as rude, impatient, and dramatic. He is rude because he treats others poorly. He is impatient because he wants the jurors to make a decision as quickly as possible so he can leave.

Who was the youngest juror in 12 Angry Men?

CharactersJuror #1954 Studio One actor1957 film actorA soft-spoken paramedic from a violent slum, traditionally the youngest juror. The third to vote "not guilty".6Bart BurnsEdward BinnsA house painter, tough but principled and respectful. The sixth to vote "not guilty".7Paul HartmanJack Warden20 more rows

Which juror grew up in the slums?

Juror Five in the drama 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose relates more to the defendant than he does to any of the jury members. Like the defendant, he grew up in the slums where family dysfunction and street violence were a way of life.

What are the legal issues in 12 angry men?

In the movie 12 Angry Men, there were several legal and factual issues. One involved the credibility of the witnesses. One of the witnesses, an old man who lived on the second floor beneath the murder scene said he heard the boy say to his father, “I’m gonna kill you.”.

What is the movie 12 angry men about?

The movie 12 Angry Men focuses on Jury deliberations regarding a case involving a boy accused of stabbing his father to death. Over the course of the movie one dissenting juror convinces the others that the case is not as obvious or clear cut as it seemed in court. He ultimately manages to change the minds of the other jurors until they find the boy not guilty due to reasonable doubt.

Can a boy have done the slash?

Regarding the viability of the evidence, it was shown that due to the height of the boy compared to the height of the father and the angle of the slash that killed the father, it was unlikely if not impossible that the boy could have done it.

Who is the only juror to vote not guilty?

The central character in the play, Eight is the only juror to initially vote “not guilty.” This vote, which prevents an immediate unanimous guilty decision, and his insistence that the jurors commit time and effort… read analysis of Eight

Who is the leader of the jurors who facilitates the process of voting and discussion?

Foreman . The leader of the jurors who facilitates the process of voting and discussion. The Foreman believes in the guilt of accused for a majority of the play. He is not particularly intelligent or actively involved… read analysis of Foreman.

What is Ten driven by?

The most prejudiced and cruel character in the play, Ten is driven by a deep-seated “us versus them” complex concerning rich and poor. He speaks of the accused and people like him, from poor backgrounds… read analysis of Ten

What is an indecisive man?

An indecisive man whose opinion is easily swayed by Eight and by Four. He changes his guilty vote to not guilty based on the calm and persuasive conduct of Eight and the angry conduct of Three.

Who was the first person to change his guilty vote to not guilty?

An elderly, good-natured man, Nine is compassionate and thoughtful, unlike many of the other jurors. He is the first to change his “guilty” vote to “not guilty” during the secret ballot vote. He does so… read analysis of Nine

Is Twelve a snob?

A man who is defined by his job in advertising, Twelve is shallow and a snob. He maintains his vote of “guilty” more out of the comfort of maintaining his opinion than any other reason… read analysis of Twelve

Is the accused kid a character?

Accused kid. Although the accused youth never appears as a character on stage , discussion of his actions and motivations drives the play. The youth is referred to as a “kid” by many of the jurors. He grew… read analysis of Accused kid.

Why are the jurors upset with the young man?

Some of the juries are upset with the young man because they have had similar experiences to him but we can also see how some of the jurors understand everything that this young man has lived for 19 years. One of the juries that always said that he could not notice that the decision he was taking was not adequate so he felt the tension and harassment of the other juries. Neither were the reasons, but rather prejudices, and that it was a family problem that he had in the past, the reason for which he accused the young man without foundation, for which he realized his mistake and was the reason why he did not continue holding the accusation.

Why can one of the jurors say they will only believe the witnesses?

One of the jurors makes the other jurors understand that not only can they say they will only believe the witnesses because they also have to see everything that was around the crime scene. He does not consider that the murder was committed for any reason.

What is the boy's alibi in Juror 8?

The boy’s alibi is that he was at the movies during the hours the killing took place, although he couldn’t remember the names of the movies or the stars who appeared in them.

What does Juror 8 say about the accused being not guilty?

Towards the beginning of the film when considering the possibility of the accused being not guilty, Juror #8 says, “It’s possible isn’t it?” All it takes is reasonable doubt of one man, one man who stood alone against a room of men convinced that this boy is guilty.

What is Juror 3 in the movie?

Throughout the film, Juror #3 is a brick wall in regards to him hearing opposing arguments, barring a minor exception or two. He always draws back to the conclusion that the boy is guilty. But, as the film progresses every juror eventually concludes that the boy is not guilty: everyone except Juror #3. He won’t concur.

What is the most important aspect of Juror 3?

This is arguably one of the most important aspects of the film. This — is the plant.

What happens after it rains in Juror 8?

After it starts raining, Juror #1 and Juror #8 go to lower the windows, where Juror #1 shares an anecdote. He’s the assistant head coach of a high school football team where he once played a game where his team was behind 7–6, but they’re “starting to move along real nice.”.

What does Juror 9 say?

Juror #9 responds by saying, “Only an ignorant man can believe that” and that’s the last we hear of Juror #10’s prejudice for a while.

What does Juror 8 say in the early discussion of the verdict?

In the early discussion of the verdict, Juror #10 asks “What are we sitting here for?” Juror #8 states that “I just think we owe him a few words that’s all.” After telling Juror #8 he believes they don’t owe the accused a thing, Juror #10 makes a small speech: