what is covered by the attorney work product doctrine

What is the Work Product Doctrine? Protects from disclosure to third parties documents and tangible things that are both: Prepared by or at the direction of an attorney.

Full Answer

What is considered attorney work product?

The work product doctrine states that an adverse party generally may not discover or compel disclosure of written or oral materials prepared by or for an attorney in the course of legal representation, especially in preparation for litigation. However, under Rule 26 (b) (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure , an adverse party may discover or compel disclosure of work …

What is attorney work product rule?

Work Product Doctrine Definition Protects from discovery documents or material things prepared: • In anticipation of litigation or for trial; and • By or for a party or by or for a party’s representative Work Product Doctrine What Does it Protect? • Written statements, private memoranda, fact chronologies, mental impressions,

What is a product doctrine?

The work product doctrine, which protects trial preparation mate- rials from discovery, is a doctrine of uncertain dimension.I The scope of protection the doctrine provides these materials is one of the "most con-

What does work product mean in law?

The work product doctrine is another limitation on discoverable material. It protects certain documents, crafted by a lawyer in anticipation of litigation, that are not covered by any of the aforementioned privileges. At issue is whether the thoughts and mental impressions of the lawyer, memorialized in notes and other documents and crafted in anticipation of litigation are …

What is covered under the work product doctrine?

In California, the work product doctrine absolutely protects from disclosure to third parties writings that contain an attorney's impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 2018.030(a)).

What is the difference between attorney-client privilege and work product?

The attorney-client privilege protects from disclosure to third parties confidential attorney-client communications that relate to legal advice. ... The work product doctrine protects from disclosure to third parties documents and tangible things that a party or its representative prepares in anticipation of litigation.

Does work product include communications?

Communication is a key part of any attorney-client relationship. ... With that said, no communication is required for the work product doctrine. Memorandums and other notations will most likely be protected if those documents were made in anticipation of litigation.Mar 17, 2020

What is qualified work product?

The work product doctrine is typically raised as a defense to a request for discovery from an opposing party such as the prosecutor or a collateral plaintiff in a civil action. ... Qualified Work Product - This kind of material may contain certain impressions that are not the attorneys.Aug 6, 2010

What documents are protected by the work product doctrine?

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. The work-product doctrine generally protects from discovery by an adverse party any materials prepared by or for a party, including by in-house counsel, in “anticipation of litigation.”

Who holds the work product privilege?

Proc. § 2018.030. Even though the attorney client privilege and the work product doctrine are similar in many ways, the holders of these privileges are distinct. Rather than the client, the attorney is the holder of work product protection.

Are witness statements work product?

The California Supreme Court held that witness statements collected by or at the direction of an attorney constitute at least qualified work product, as a matter of law.

Is the work product doctrine a privilege?

Under California's civil attorney work product statute, a “writing that reflects an attorney's impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal research or theories is not discoverable under any circumstances,” (Cal. Code Civ. Pro. Section 2018.030(a)), and is thus absolutely privileged.

Are emails with in house counsel privilege?

The Presence of In-house Counsel Does Not Mean Communication Is Automatically Privileged. Communications to or from in-house counsel are not protected by the privilege simply because the in-house counsel is an attorney, or because an in-house attorney was in attendance at a meeting or copied on an email.Jun 24, 2020

Where does the work product doctrine come from?

The work-product privilege or doctrine1 originated in the seminal case of Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S. Ct. 385 (1947, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that statements of witnesses obtained by an attorney prior to trial were privileged and thus protected from discovery.Jul 7, 2021

What are the FRCP rules that explain e discovery?

No later than 100 days after the filing of a lawsuit, clients must be prepared to discuss and make cost-driven decisions on important electronic discovery issues such as: (1) the format in which electronic documents will be produced; (2) the manner in which electronic documents will be preserved by the parties; and (3) ...

What is the work product doctrine?

The work-product doctrine is a judge-created doctrine, and as initially crafted, protected from discovery written statements, private memoranda and personal recollections prepared by an attorney in anticipation of litigation.1 The intention was to create a zone of privacy around the attorney so as to allow the preparation and development of legal theories and strategies with an eye toward litigation, free from unnecessary intrusion by his adversaries.2

Can a dual purpose document be subject to work product protection?

Looking at the totality of the situation, the court concluded that a dual-purpose document could nevertheless be subject to work-product protection if the document was created in anticipation of litigation and would not have been created in substantially similar form, but for the prospect of litigation.15

What is dual purpose document?

Another tough issue is presented by dual-purpose documents — documents created for both a business reason and in anticipation of litigation. Work-product protection will not be afforded the document if it would have been prepared in substantially similar form or content irrespective of the expected or anticipated litigation. The pertinent question is what would have happened had there been no litigation threat—that is, would the party seeking work-product protection have generated the document if it were acting solely for a business-related purpose?12 To answer this inquiry, courts focus on the form, or content of the document and ask whether the document would have been prepared in substantially similar form but for the prospect of litigation. If this showing can be made, the privilege applies, but if the document would have been prepared in the same form regardless of the threat of litigation, the document goes unprotected.13

Do contractors need a lien waiver?

Contractors expect lien waivers to be submitted over the course of a construction project. Most states have standard forms that can be used to ensure these agreements are properly recognized in court. A recent federal case discussed the effect of leaving portions of a lien waiver blank, ostensibly to carry out the intent of an oral agreement.

What is mandatory arbitration?

Many provisions contain specific requirements, such as the parties agreeing to use a specific entity (like the American Arbitrations Association), the use of a specific number of arbitrators (typically one or three) and/or the distinction of what specific claims the arbitrator is allowed to decide (some provisions exclude fraud and other claims). All of these issues deal with an arbitrator’s jurisdiction to decide a claim.

What is caveat emptor in Georgia?

In Georgia, the long-standing rule in real estate purchases is caveat emptor (“let the buyer beware”). There is one exception: a negligence action against a builder/seller. A builder/seller may be held liable in negligence where a dwelling is sold containing latent defects that the builder in the exercise of ordinary care knew or should have known and that the buyer could not have discovered in the exercise of ordinary care. Georgia courts have not previously addressed whether this exception applies to an ordinary seller of real estate who performs its own repairs on the dwelling (i.e., whether an ordinary seller who performs repairs is a builder/seller under the exception to caveat emptor).

What is the FAA in real estate?

The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) evidences a congressional policy to encourage arbitration, and although parties are free to agree that state arbitration law applies, the state law may be pre-empted by the FAA if the transaction involves interstate commerce. In this case, the issue presented was whether an agreement to purchase real estate was a transaction in interstate commerce, and thus implicating the FAA, or one involving purely intrastate commerce. South Carolina courts had not previously addressed this issue presenting a case of first impression. In this case, two parties entered into a Home Purchase Agreement, which contained a Mandatory Binding Arbitration provision stating that all disputes should be resolved by arbitration. The purchaser initiated a lawsuit against the seller alleging numerous construction defects in the dwelling and contending that the arbitration clause was unenforceable under the South Carolina Arbitration Act because the arbitration clause was not on the first page of the Agreement and not identified by capital letters and underlining, all of which are required under the South Carolina Act. The seller contended that the arbitration clause complied with South Carolina law, and thus was enforceable, and alternatively that the arbitration provision was enforceable under the FAA because the sales transaction involved interstate commerce. The seller argued that the sales agreement involved interstate commerce because although it was entered in South Carolina: 1) it required the seller to obtain a warranty from a company in Georgia and to submit any claims to that company in Georgia; 2) the home mortgage was financed by a North Carolina branch of a bank; and 3) the contractor used subcontractors, materials and suppliers from outside of South Carolina. The lower court found the arbitration provision in the Agreement did not comply with the South Carolina Arbitration Act, and also found that the agreement was not subject to the FAA, as the seller did not sufficiently demonstrate that the transaction involved interstate commerce.