Disciplinary History. An attorney may request a disciplinary history letter at any time by completing the Request for Disciplinary History Form. The form must be signed by the requesting attorney in order for the request to be processed. The attorney may request the Disciplinary History Letter be sent to any entity of his choosing.
Attorney Discipline. Attorney discipline summaries in this section are based on discipline orders, but are not official records. Official discipline information can be found on an attorney's profile and in the State Bar Court case search. Copies of official attorney discipline records are available upon request. Select County.
The Attorney Disciplinary Board is the agency of the Supreme Court of Iowa that receives, initiates, and investigates complaints of ethical misconduct filed against attorneys who are authorized to practice in Iowa. Click here for the Board's current informational brochure. The Board’s primary objective is to ensure that attorneys within its ...
All complaints, information, investigations and private discipline are confidential. As such the OPC is not able to confirm or deny that anything has been filed against an attorney or LPP, that an attorney or LPP is being investigated for an alleged violation of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct, or that an attorney or LPP has received ...
Most complaints that involve the behavior of an attorney outside the practice of law, such as rudeness, the use of profanity, landlord-tenant disputes and debtor-creditor matters, are not within the Board’s jurisdiction. However, criminal or fraudulent conduct may be subject to discipline.
Lawyers should represent their clients’ interests aggressively, which may involve relying on the clients’ version of the facts. In lawsuits, disputes about the facts are resolved by the courts.
The procedures for investigating and evaluating ethical complaints and disciplining attorneys are not a substitute for appeal. You should consult with an attorney to protect your legal rights and determine the nature of your legal responsibilities.
If a lawyer violates an ethical rule, the lawyer may be disciplined. Some problems with lawyers are properly the subject of a complaint of ethical violation to the Attorney Disciplinary Board. Others are not. Here are a few examples of types of complaints handled by the Board:
Money and Accounting. Sometimes lawyers handle money for clients. The lawyer must promptly and completely account for a client’s money. If there is any significant delay in receiving money from a lawyer or in getting a complete accounting, a complaint can be filed.
Conflicts of Interest. A lawyer owes a client undivided loyalty, unburdened by the interests of other clients or the lawyer’s own personal interest. A lawyer should not represent more than one client in a matter unless both consent after full disclosure by the lawyer.
A lawyer owes a client undivided loyalty, unburdened by the interests of other clients or the lawyer’s own personal interest. A lawyer should not represent more than one client in a matter unless both consent after full disclosure by the lawyer. If you believe that your lawyer is acting improperly in representing conflicting interests, you may file a complaint.
Please note that disability is not a form of discipline. Nonetheless, attorneys or LPPs who have been transferred to disability may be part of the summaries. Attorneys or LPPs suspended for non-payment of dues or failure to comply with CLE requirements are not part of the summaries.
There is no identifying information on private forms of discipline (such as a private admonition). Private discipline is not a matter of public record and remains confidential.
Disciplinary sanction orders are entered against an attorney or LPP by the Utah Supreme Court either through its direct ruling, or as delegated to the State District Courts or the Supreme Court’s Ethics and Discipline Committee, pursuant to the Rules of Lawyer Discipline and Disability. The document that you will be searching contains discipline ...
View the orders of the Disciplinary Hearing Commission and Grievance Committee that are published in the State Bar Journal. Also, search for orders of the State Bar's Grievance Committee, the Disciplinary Hearing Commission, and state and federal courts imposing professional discipline, and orders transferring lawyers to disability inactive status.
View the Disciplinary Hearing Commission (DHC) trial schedule, as well as complaints and answers filed with the DHC.
Wake County Superior Court has entered injunctions prohibiting the following North Carolina lawyers from handling entrusted funds. Here you can search and view these injunctions, and sign up for emails alerts.
Annual reports of the North Carolina State Bar's Disciplinary Hearing Commission, the trial arm of the North Carolina State Bar which is composed of 12 lawyers and 8 nonlawyers.
The purposes of the NC State Bar’s disciplinary process are to protect the public from harm that could result from unethical conduct of lawyers, and to protect the integrity of the justice system. The process begins when allegations of possible professional misconduct come to the State Bar’s attention.
The North Carolina State Bar provides services for those who already have an attorney but have encountered problems with their representation.
The structure of the Discipline Board is similar to that of the Commission, that is, the Board consists of six lawyers and three non-lawyers appointed by the Supreme Court to a maximum of two three-year terms. The Board oversees a professional staff of three lawyers, including its Executive Director, and four support staff.
In addition to prosecuting formal complaints as authorized by the Grievance Commission, the Grievance Administrator may also institute public discipline proceedings based upon an attorney’s conviction of a crime, or by filing proof that the attorney was disciplined in another jurisdiction.
Reciprocal Discipline. A certified copy of a final adjudication of misconduct entered by a court or a court authorized discipline agency in another state, or in a federal court, is sufficient to establish the misconduct in a reciprocal discipline proceeding instituted in Michigan.
The prosecutorial and adjudicative functions were separated within the agency, insofar as practicable, to avoid unfairness. Two features of the Grievance Board system were particularly innovative in 1970. The first was the inclusion of non-lawyer members on the Grievance Board.
Two features of the Grievance Board system were particularly innovative in 1970. The first was the inclusion of non-lawyer members on the Grievance Board. The second was giving the hearing panel the authority to order ( not recommend) all levels of discipline.
1 The author of that report was the Clark Committee’s official reporter, Michael Franck. In 1970, Mr. Franck began his 24-year tenure as Executive Director of the State Bar of Michigan. It is not coincidental that Michigan’s discipline system was one of the first to incorporate many of the recommendations made by the Clark Committee and, later, ...
The Grievance Administrator is authorized to enforce discipline orders through the institution of contempt proceedings in a circuit court. Like the Attorney Discipline Board, the Grievance Administrator must file quarterly and annual activity reports with the Supreme Court summarizing the Commission’s activities.
For sanction or disciplinary information beyond 10 years, you need to contact the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel: (877) 953-5555. There is a $20 charge for a certified copy of a disciplinary judgment for a Texas attorney.
Public disciplinary history for Texas and other states. The website states that Texas disciplinary sanctions within the last 10 years are shown. For sanction or disciplinary information beyond 10 years , you need to contact the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel: (877) 953-5555.