The average hourly rate for a lawyer in Pennsylvania is between $199 and $354 per hour.
The average hourly rate for a family lawyer in Pennsylvania is $262 per hour.
The average hourly rate for a civil litigation lawyer in Pennsylvania is $323 per hour.
Intellectual Property attorneys are the highest paid type of lawyer in Pennsylvania, earning $354 per hour on average.
Criminal attorneys are the lowest paid type of lawyer in Pennsylvania, earning $199 per hour on average.
The purpose of a power of attorney is to give another person – your agent – the power to make financial and property transactions for you. The term used for the person signing the power of attorney is the “principal.”
Changes to the Form and Execution of a Power of Attorney – effective January 1, 2015
These three requirements are that the agent must: (1) act in accordance with the principal’s reasonable expectations to the extent actually known by the agent, and otherwise in the principal’s best interests; (2) act in good faith; and (3) act only within the scope of authority granted in the power of attorney.
Pennsylvania banks are pleased with the new law’s implications for the duty to accept a power of attorney and the liability for not accepting a power of attorney. The changes not only protect banks and other financial institutions, but anyone who is asked to accept the decisions of an agent. Everything contained in this section with regard to banks and bankers applies equally to any other individual or business asked to accept a power of attorney.
The new law provides that for every purpose except filing or recording the power of attorney with the Orphans’ Court or Register of Deeds, a copy of a power of attorney has the same effect as an original. We usually provide our clients with a couple of originals and a couple of copies of their powers of attorney. I always tell clients to use a copy if at all possible. This becomes especially important if the principal becomes incapacitated and cannot execute another power of attorney. This new law clarifies for everyone that a copy of a power of attorney should be accepted by anyone except the Orphan’s Court or the Recorder of Deeds.
Every lawyer is responsible for observance of the Rules of Professional Conduct. A lawyer should also aid in securing their observance by other lawyers. Neglect of these responsibilities compromises the independence of the profession and the public interest which it serves.
As advocate, a lawyer zealously asserts the client’s position under the rules of the adversary system. As negotiator, a lawyer seeks a result advantageous to the client but consistent with requirements of honest dealings with others.
In some circumstances, a lawyer may be justified in delaying transmission of information when the client would be likely to react imprudently to an immediate communication. Thus, a lawyer might withhold a psychiatric diagnosis of a client when the examining psychiatrist indicates that disclosure would harm the client. A lawyer may not withhold information to serve the lawyer's own interests or convenience or the interests or convenience of another person. Rules or court orders governing litigation may provide that information supplied to a lawyer may not be disclosed to the client.
A group of lawyers could be regarded as a firm for purposes of a rule that the same lawyer should not represent opposing parties in litigation, e.g., Rules 1.7 (a), 1.10 (a), while it might not be so regarded for purposes of a rule that information acquired by one lawyer is attributed to another, e.g., Rule 1.10 (b).
The Rules of Professional Conduct are rules of reason. They should be interpreted with reference to the purposes of legal representation and of the law itself. Some of the Rules are imperatives, cast in the terms "shall" or "shall not." These define proper conduct for purposes of professional discipline. Others, generally cast in the term "may" or "should," are permissive and define areas under the Rules in which the lawyer has discretion to exercise professional judgment. No disciplinary action should be taken when the lawyer chooses not to act or acts within the bounds of such discretion. Other Rules define the nature of relationships between the lawyer and others. The Rules are thus partly obligatory and disciplinary and partly constitutive and descriptive in that they define a lawyer's professional role. Many of the Comments use the term "should." Comments do not add obligations to the Rules but provide guidance for practicing in compliance with the Rules.
Lawyers play a vital role in the preservation of society. The fulfillment of this role requires an understanding by lawyers of their relationship to our legal system. The Rules of Professional Conduct, when properly applied, serve to define that relationship.
Although the public interest is usually best served by a strict rule requiring lawyers to preserve the confidentiality of information relating to the representation of their clients , the confidentiality rule is subject to limited exceptions. In becoming privy to information about a client, a lawyer may foresee that the client intends or learn that the client has caused serious harm to another person. However, to the extent that a lawyer is required or permitted to disclose a client's purposes or conduct, the client may be inhibited from revealing facts that would enable the lawyer effectively to represent the client. Generally, the public interest is better served if full disclosure by clients to their lawyers is encouraged rather than inhibited. With limited exceptions, information relating to the representation must be kept confidential by a lawyer, as stated in paragraph (a).
The lawyer has a duty to keep funds and property separate from the lawyer’s own property. The lawyer has a duty to give notice of the receipt of any funds or other property. The lawyer has a duty to maintain appropriate records of any property, particularly money, held on behalf of another.
One of the most common reasons for the imposition of serious discipline against a lawyer is the lawyer’s failure to handle fiduciary funds properly. Safeguarding money held for clients and others is of such importance that all lawyers are required to certify compliance with the provisions of Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (R.P.C. 1.15) as a part of the annual licensing process with the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Recent concerns about the safety of funds entrusted to attorneys by the public have prompted significant changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement. These changes impose a heightened vigilance upon attorneys through strict rules on how attorneys maintain client funds, as well as increased accountability through additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
A lawyer must promptly notify the client or third party of receipt of funds in which the person has an interest. “Prompt” notification should take place in a matter of days rather than weeks or months.
Maintenance of Records. As set forth above, according to Rule 1.15 (c), a lawyer must preserve and maintain the above required records for a period of five (5) years after termination of the attorney-client relationship, the termination of the lawyer’s fiduciary relationship, or after distribution or disposition of the trust property held by the lawyer, whichever occurs later.
The lawyer has a duty to render an accounting of any funds held in a fiduciary capacity on request.
All transaction records provided by the financial institution maintaining the trust account, including cancelled checks, statements, records of deposit, records of electronic transactions, etc., must be maintained by the attorney or law firm; Check Registry.
All transfers of earned funds or funds for expense reimbursement from a trust account to the lawyer should be made by check, electronic transfer, or other recorded transaction to an account that is clearly identified as belonging to the lawyer. A lawyer shall never under any circumstances withdraw cash from a trust account.
(9) In addition to conflicts with other current clients, a lawyer's duties of loyalty and independence may be materially limited by responsibilities to former clients under Rule 1.9 or by the lawyer's responsibilities to other persons, such as fiduciary duties arising from a lawyer's service as a trustee, executor or corporate director.
Personal Interest Conflicts. (10) The lawyer's own interests should not be permitted to have an adverse effect on representation of a client. For example, if the probity of a lawyer's own conduct in a transaction is in serious question, it may be difficult or impossible for the lawyer to give a client detached advice.
A concurrent conflict of interest exists if: (2) there is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or by a personal interest of the lawyer.
Similarly, when a lawyer has discussions concerning possible employment with an opponent of the lawyer's client, or with a law firm representing the opponent, such discussions could materially limit the lawyer's representation of the client.
The critical questions are the likelihood that a difference in interests will eventuate and, if it does, whether it will materially interfere with the lawyer's independent professional judgment in considering alternatives or foreclose courses of action that reasonably should be pursued on behalf of the client.
General Principles. (1) Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyer's relationship to a client. Concurrent conflicts of interest can arise from the lawyer's responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person or from the lawyer's own interests.
Thus, a lawyer related to another lawyer, e.g., as parent, child, sibling or spouse, ordinarily may not represent a client in a matter where that lawyer is representing another party, unless each client gives informed consent.
Our Pittsburgh men’s rights law firm has represented over 1500 family law clients including more than 500 child custody clients. We were pioneers in advocating for father’s rights in Western Pennsylvania and fought many courtroom battles to advocate for an equal playing field for fathers. We believe we are different from other Pittsburgh family law firms for many other reasons.
If a father has primary physical custody of the minor children, the mother owes child support to the father! Another scenario is when the mother and father share physical custody and the mother earns more than the father; in this scenario the mother would owe child support to the children’s father.
In the early days of the Generations program, there were little guidelines for the court-appointed psychologists in issuing their opinions, and nearly any psychologist holding a license was permitted to be added to the list for appointments. Sadly, it was a time when there was a large number of poorly drafted reports.
Clients often ask whether the Pennsylvania family courts have always favored mothers when deciding child custody disputes. Strangely enough, the answer is no. Prior to the early 1800’s, the American laws were largely derived from English common law, or in other words, laws derived from individual cases decided under English law.
It is true that in our firm’s early years our Pittsburgh law office was seen as a clear fathers’ rights law firm. However, that was because during those early years many of the Pennsylvania custody orders included awards of primary custody to the mother and fathers were the parent most often seeking to change the custody order.