The executor of a deceased client’s estate or the spouse of a deceased client has the right to waive this privilege. However, if the client’s secret concerns their spouse or the executor, the attorney may not share that secret in order to allow the executor or spouse to waive that privilege.
Nov 06, 2020 · There are a few exceptions to the rule of the attorney-client privilege that survive a client’s death. Attorneys may discuss their client’s competency to sign documents. The executor of a deceased client’s estate or the spouse of a deceased client has the right to waive this privilege. However, if the client’s secret concerns their ...
Oct 03, 2020 · There are a few, tiny exceptions to this rule of the attorney-client privilege surviving a client’s death. Attorneys can share that now-deceased clients were competent to sign documents. And, an...
May 23, 2018 · The California Supreme Court, in analyzing Evidence Code sections 953, subdivision (c) and 954, stated: “Taken together, these two sections unambiguously provide that only a personal representative may claim the attorney-client privilege in the case of a deceased client.” (HLC Properties Ltd. v. Super. Ct. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 54, 65.) The Court went on to …
Generally, the Executor succeeds to and receives A/C privilege of the deceased person; in other words, it is the Executor’s privilege to assert: T.R.C.E., Rule 503 (c) (3): The privilege may be claimed by a deceased client’s personal representative (“PR”).
To strengthen the privilege even more, that the attorney-client privilege survives the client’s death. So, when a client dies, the attorney may grieve, but the attorney also must remember that the secrets that the attorney knows about the client will likely never be shared.
Attorney-client privilege requires that attorneys keep confidential and refrain from sharing all secrets and other confidences of clients. This includes sensitive matters about clients about which the attorney is told by someone other than a client. In other words, attorneys cannot share secrets from the clients, and attorneys cannot gossip about their clients’ sensitive matters that the attorney hears from someone other than the client.
One of the worst parts of an attorney’s job is to handle the death of a client. We attorneys can easily handle the estate administration process. The issue is that most attorneys get to know their clients very well, especially when advising clients on estate planning and business succession. In fact, I consider most of my clients to be friends of mine. As a result, attorneys can grieve just like anyone else does on the loss of someone important.
Sometimes even client identities are such that they have to be kept confidential. For instance, if I have a client who wants to make a confidential bid on some real estate or wants to remain confidential after winning the lottery, their identity is as confidential as anything that the client tells me verbally.
Attorneys provide the best advice when clients are completely honest and upfront with their attorneys. Sometimes, there are some things that attorneys do not necessarily need to know. For example, I do not mind some chit chat with clients, but I generally do not need to know the details surrounding the knee surgery that a client’s neighbor had last week.
And, an executor of a deceased client’s estate or a spouse of a deceased client can waive the privilege. However, as might be expected, if the client’s secret is a secret about the executor or spouse, the attorney cannot share the secret in order to allow the executor or spouse to waive the privilege.
This subsection expressly limits the holder of the attorney-client privilege to the personal representative, i.e. an executor, administrator or special administrator appointed by the court. Simply being nominated in a will does not make one a “personal representative.”
In many cases today there will not be a court-appointed personal representative because prior to death the decedent transferred all of her assets to a trust. And, a trustee is not a personal representative. (Prob. Code §58.) Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client.
Code §58.) Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client. An attorney should also be aware that even when the attorney-client privilege is not terminated because there is a personal ...
Evidence Code section 954 (c) provides in relevant part: …” [the lawyer] may not claim the privilege if there is no holder of the privilege in existence…” (Emphasis added.)
The only exception in that statute is that an attorney may, but is not required to, reveal confidential information to the extent that the attorney reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act that the attorney reasonably believes is likely to result in death of, or substantial bodily harm to, an individual. ...
v. Super. Ct. (2005) 35 Cal.4th 54, 65.) The Court went on to conclude that when there is no personal representative the attorney-client privilege terminates. ( Id. at 66.)
Evidence Code section 955 provides that an attorney may only claim the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a client if the attorney is authorized to claim the privilege under Evidence Code section 954 (c). Evidence Code section 954 (c) provides in relevant part: …” [the lawyer] may not claim the privilege if there is no holder ...
If you get into a lawsuit, Post-Death over the validity of a that Decedent’s Will or Trust a JTWROS Agreement or something of that nature , then the A/C privilege with the Decedent and his attorney in relation to such documents would not apply, based upon the exception. Absolutely discoverable!
To invoke the exception, the question is: What does “claiming through the same decedent” mean? As Plaintiff, I would argue that the decedent’s lawyer’s entire file is discoverable because the end result of the fight is a claim through the same decedent; the Party and the Estate are fighting over the contract. More accurately though, the communications between the decedent and his/her attorney regarding the contract creation, its meaning, and interpretation, i.e., the ultimate issue, in that case, would be subject to discovery. But, the communications between the attorney and the deceased party in relation to the representation in that lawsuit pending at the time of death would be less certain.
However, if you are in a lawsuit over the validity or enforceability of a contract at the time of decedent’s death, then you have more of a gray area; possibly a hybrid situation.
When we file a will contest or a trust contest, the first thing we do is subpoena the scrivener’s file.
When you are not sure how a death can affect your legal rights, contact the experienced probate lawyers at Spencer & Johnson.
Generally, the Executor succeeds to and receives A/C privilege of the deceased person; in other words, it is the Executor’s privilege to assert:
You and the Executor can assert and must preserve that privilege, as it may affect the progression of your personal injury lawsuit and, because the Parties are not claiming through the same decedent, there is no exception.
The general rule in Nevada is that the attorney-client privilege survives the death of a client. However, the personal representative of the estate of the deceased client is entitled to any information from the attorney as a matter of necessity since the personal representative is charged with duties that include the carrying out the terms of the last will and testament, preserving and safeguarding the assets of the estate, and filing a written inventory of the estate assets. Essentially, the personal representative steps into the shoes of the deceased client. The attorney-client privilege passes to the personal representative of the estate of the deceased client and can be asserted by the personal representative.
For example, a party brings an action alleging that the last will and testament or the revocable trust is invalid because the decedent was unduly influenced in the making of the will or trust. There is no privilege as to a communication relevant to an issue between parties who claim through the same deceased client. A related exception is that there is no privilege as to a communication relevant to an issue concerning an attested document such as a last will and testament to which the attorney is an attesting witness. These exceptions are practical necessities to enable a party to establish the validity or invalidity of a will or trust of a decedent.
In summary, an estate planning client can rest assured that information furnished to an attorney remains confidential after his or her death with certain, practical exceptions.
An attorney cannot reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent or the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation of the client. This duty of non-disclosure is often referred to as the attorney-client privilege. But what happens to this privilege when the client dies? For example, an attorney assists a client in his or her estate planning, specifically the preparation and execution of the client’s revocable trust agreement, last will and testament and related estate planning documents. During the course of the representation, disclosures are made by the client to the attorney regarding the assets and liabilities of the client, the family dynamics, and the intent of the client. Does the confidentiality of this information survive the death of the client and continue on? The short answer is yes, with certain exceptions.
In many cases today there will not be a court-appointed personal representative because prior to death the decedent transferred all of her assets to a trust. And, a trustee is not a personal representative. (Prob. Code §58.) Accordingly, in situations where there is no personal representative, then there is no holder of the privilege and the attorney cannot assert the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a deceased client.
An attorney should also be aware that even when the attorney-client privilege is not terminated because there is a personal representative, the Evidence Code provides exceptions to the attorney-client privilege in several situations, primarily involving a decedent’s estate planning, which require the attorney to reveal the client’s confidential information. (See Evid. Code §§956-962.)
(e), an attorney must maintain inviolate a client’s confidences. The only exception in that statute is that an attorney may, but is not required to, reveal confidential information to the extent that the attorney reasonably believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent a criminal act that the attorney reasonably believes is likely to result in death of, or substantial bodily harm to, an individual. But, the Evidence Code and applicable case law provide that the rules applicable to disclosure of a client’s confidences change after the client dies.
v. Super. Ct. (2005) 35 Cal.4 th 54, 65.) The Court went on to conclude that when there is no personal representative the attorney-client privilege terminates. ( Id. at 66.)
Evidence Code section 955 provides that an attorney may only claim the attorney-client privilege on behalf of a client if the attorney is authorized to claim the privilege under Evidence Code section 954 (c).