Your mock trial defense opening statement might go a little like this: Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my name is so-and-so and it is my privilege to represent (name of client) in this case before you today. You have heard the prosecutor explain what she hopes will be proven, but the prosecutor did not tell you all the facts.
How to Write a Defense Opening Statement for a Mock Trial THE INTRODUCTION: Good morning, my name is Ralph Jurgensen, and it is my pleasure to represent so and so on this very important case. The defendant stands here falsely accused of _____, a very serious crime. At the conclusion of the case we will ask for a verdict of not guilty. THE THEME:
Jan 31, 2011 · Your mock trial defense opening statement might go a little like this: Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my name is so-and-so and it is my privilege to represent (name of client) in this case before you today. You have heard the prosecutor explain what she hopes will be proven, but the prosecutor did not tell you all the facts.
Do not delve too deep into legal terms or you will lose the jury’s attention. Talk about burden of proof. Tell the jury what the evidence has (and has not) shown and how the elements that need to be shown have (or have not) been proven. Focus on the key issues.
Dec 25, 2010 · If you want to know how to write an opening statement for a mock trial, you can look at examples, but remember you will need to tailor your opening for the specific facts of your case. The best way to avoid getting nervous is to practice your opening in front of the mirror, and then practice it front of a friend, and then practice it in front of three friends, and then in front of …
HOW TO WRITE A PROSECUTION OPENING STATEMENT FOR MOCK TRIALTHE INTRODUCTION. Good afternoon, my name is so-and-so, and it is my pleasure to represent the State of Columbus and to serve as a prosecutor on this very important case. ... THE THEME: ... SUMMARIZE EACH WITNESS:Examples: ... Anticipate the defense theories: ... CONCLUSION:
Opening Statement ChecklistState your theme immediately in one sentence.Tell the story of the case without argument.Persuasively order your facts in a sequence that supports your theme.Decide whether to address the bad facts in the opening or not.Do not read your opening statement. ... Bring an outline, if necessary.More items...•Oct 30, 2015
HOW TO WRITE A DEFENSE CLOSING ARGUMENT FOR MOCK TRIALThe Greeting. ... The Thank You. ... Lack of Evidence. ... Echo Themes and Theories. ... Critiquing the State's Case. ... Burden of Proof. ... Highlight the Testimony from Your Witnesses. ... Conclusion.More items...
Generally, closing arguments should include:a summary of the evidence.any reasonable inferences that can be draw from the evidence.an attack on any holes or weaknesses in the other side's case.a summary of the law for the jury and a reminder to follow it, and.More items...
Tasks for each side:Develop a theory of the case. Brainstorm. ... Identify case themes. Brainstorm as many as possible. ... Create opening statements, directs, crosses, closing arguments, and witness profiles using: Timeline. ... Identify evidence to try to keep out.Create a Master Trial Notebook which contains the following:
8:4911:16How to Speak like a Veteran Lawyer in 11 minutes - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipSo when you speak and it's very hard to explain empathy and non verbals. But you're going to useMoreSo when you speak and it's very hard to explain empathy and non verbals. But you're going to use very soft friendly. Body language tonality and eye contact.
You will be defending Macbeth by trying to create doubt about his competence or his actual guilt. You will collect evidence and write a closing argument addressed to the judge and jury to try to persuade them that Macbeth was (or is) insane.
When drafting your Defence, you need to respond to the Statement of Claim, which will be the longer of the two documents. The Statement of Claim should be drafted as a series of numbered paragraphs, sometimes with sub-paragraphs. View each of those numbered paragraphs as a separate allegation that you must respond to.
In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial.
Concluding sentences can start out with phrases such as 'In conclusion,' 'Thus,' and 'For this reason. 'Nov 23, 2021
The conclusion paragraph should begin by restating your thesis, and then you should broaden back out to a general topic. End with a closing statement. This paragraph looks like the reverse of your introduction paragraph, going from specific to general.
Each closing argument usually lasts 20-60 minutes. Some jurisdictions limit how long the closing may be, and some jurisdictions allow some of that time to be reserved for later.
The defense lawyer’s job is to make sure that his or her client gets a fair trial, and that means that the defense lawyer must advocate for the client’s point of view. An mock trial opening statement is scored both on the content and also on delivery.
Usually for a bench trial, the opening statement is less than one half in length , and less time is put into the planning because judge’s don’t value the opening as much. But I do think you want to let the judges know what your strong points are ahead of time, much like a jury trial.
The main difference is that an opening is an opening statement, but a closing is a closing argument. So the opening is not the opportunity for you to argue your case. Rather it is the time to tell the jury what evidence you believe will be presented so they know what to look for later on throughout the trial.
Usually when a defendant is acquitted (found “not guilty”), the jurors make that decision based on the fact that there was some small measure of doubt in their minds as to the defendant’s guilt.
Yes, it is an important distinction to make. Opening statements are for outlining your case or “telling a story”, and closing arguments is for summing up your case and arguing. However, sometimes I will sometimes sneak a little arguing into my opening.
This gives the rebuttal a natural and fluid presentation while also making it dynamic and unique to every trial. An emotional appeal.
Public Speaking. Strong public speaking ability is perhaps the most fundamental trait to a successful mock trial attorney and is especially important for the opening and closing arguments. Public speaking skills include much more than knowing one’s argument and presenting it carefully.
Mastering certain skills related to confidence in public speaking, clear legal thought and analysis, and quick critical thinking help you exude a polished and professional demeanor while elevating your argument to a higher level.
A description of what the prosecution or defense intends to prove or show. For the prosecution, this should be a statement of the charges, and the corresponding list of actions the defendant must have taken to be found guilty. This statement should be accompanied by a short description of what exactly the defendant did.
Another prerequisite to having a polished and successful opening or closing argument is a thorough understanding of the legal concepts and statutes underlying a case. This understanding is crucial for the attorney presenting these arguments because often in a case, the opening or closing arguments are the only times when legal theory can be presented directly and openly.
Ending the case is the closing argument, which is the judges’ final impression before an attorney rests their case. It is often longer and more detail-oriented in its argumentation than the opening statement.
Because the prosecution team presents their opening statement first, and because they have the burden of proof (the requirement to prove the defendant guilty), their opening will include much more storytelling. Often, a prosecution opening statement can be structured entirely around the storyline of the case.
If they have already been introduced, many attorneys just go right into their opening to save time, create drama, and make it look more like a real trial. Using a hook to begin. The closing attorney has a lot more flexibility than the opening attorney. Closing is a persuasive argument.
Closing is a persuasive argument. Briefly review what has to be proved (by you or the other side) Theory of the case. One or two sentences which tell the jury what the evidence has shown in the context of your theory of the case. “The evidence has shown by a preponderance of evidence that my client, Landry Lopez, ...
Objective: The closing statement is the attorney’s final statement to the jury before deliberation begins. The attorney reiterates the important arguments, summarizes what the evidence has and has not shown, and requests jury to consider the evidence and apply the law in his or her client’s favor.
Ways to track evidence include: Memory (fallible) Notes (cumbersome and hard to access) A master outline to checking key items off of as they come in (better) Keeping a flow chart (better) Outlines: Prepare in advance. List the key facts for each witness.
Do not delve too deep into legal terms or you will lose the jury’s attention. Talk about burden of proof. Tell the jury what the evidence has (and has not) shown and how the elements that need to be shown have (or have not) been proven. Focus on the key issues.
Closing attorneys can only talk about what evidence came in at trial#N#Witness statements are not evidence (unless they were admitted to impeach a witness)#N#Exhibits are not evidence unless admitted#N#What an attorney said in their opening statement is not evidence
Witnesses may forget key evidence. Attorneys conducting the direct and cross examinations may forget questions. Attorneys may forget the last step of offering an exhibit into evidence. Testimony and exhibits may be kept out the judge after the other side objects.
In a mock trial, typically the prosecutor has 3 or 4 witnesses, and the time spent on an opening will be 5 minutes or less. The above outline is a real basic opening statement. To some it is a little bland, or formulaic, but in my job as a criminal defense lawyer, I do often see prosecutors deliver such openings. It basically gets the job done.
So the opening statement is an opportunity to outline the facts as you anticipate they will be presented. The opening statement is not really an opportunity to argue your case, but it is an opportunity for you to begin to convince the jury about the strength of your case, or the strength of your defense. Here is an outline of a real traditional ...
In a mock trial, typically the prosecutor has 3 or 4 witnesses, and the time spent on an opening will be 5 minutes or less.
First the prosecutor gives an opening, then the defense, then the prosecutor calls her witnesses, the defense calls witnesses, the prosecutor does the closing argument, the defense closes, then the prosecutor gets to speak one more time in rebuttal. So if you volunteer to present the opening statement you will be speaking first.
However, you will lose points if you read an opening. You just never see lawyers (even inexperienced one) do that in court. Also, it seems like judges will score you on making good eye contact with the jurors, and delivering the opening with some level of feeling or emotion.
A common defense attorney strategy in opening statements is to start critiquing the state’s case, and letting the jury know that there are two sides to the story. Studies show that jurors often make up their mind about a case right after opening statements, so you need to start strong. Also remember that as a defense attorney, you ...
So take the opportunity to shoot holes in their case. In theory, you can reserve your opening statement until after the prosecution has rested, but this is rarely done (particularly in mock trial competitions).
However, it also does seem like there are some inconsistencies that are not terrible relevant, and you do not have to cover all of them due to the time restrictions. Even in real trials, lawyers make tactical decisions to not cover everything they possible could due to the limited attention span of jurors.
Members of the jury, the defense may claim that the defendant acted in self-defense. However, the impartial witnesses who saw the incident all testified that it was the defendant who approached the victim and threatened him with a knife. or.
So a good opening statement anticipates the points that the defense attorney will make in their opening statement. For example, if the defense is claiming self-defense, point out that self defnse does not apply because the defendant provoked the fight, or the defendant is much larger than the victim.
Opening statement is all about previewing the case for the jury. It is not about arguing the case (if you start arguing, then you may raise an objection from opposing counsel). So your goal is to come off as a teacher while you subtly and gently argue your case in a persuasive way.
To do this, you should implement aspects of what has occurred prior to delivering your opening statement. For example, the judge will most likely talk to the jury a couple of times before you start previewing the case (usually about procedural things).
In other words, your opening statement is not dependent on many variables so you should always write an opening statement script before your trial or mock trial. As a result, there are two things that may impact your Opening Statement.
Similarly, jury selection (or "voir dire" for the fancy folks) comes before Opening Statement as well. So you should always , ALWAYS incorporate tidbits from jury selection into your Opening Statement outline. Doing so will continue the bond that you have developed during jury selection. See how you can do that here.
Videos you watch may be added to the TV's watch history and influence TV recommendations. To avoid this, cancel and sign in to YouTube on your computer. An error occurred while retrieving sharing information. Please try again later.
Then, go through your direct examination, preferably with a third person there to observe. Do a run-through, one question and one answer at a time: 1 Ask one question and consider whether it is vague, leading, compound, or irrelevant? Has the question been asked and answered? Did you forget to lay a foundation? If so, make note of it. 2 Listen very carefully to your witness’s response to your question. Does the witness launch into a narrative? Speculate? Testify to hearsay? 3 Repeat for each question.
After you complete a run-through where your witness gives all the testimony you need, do more run-throughs to make your questions and answers as objection-proof as possible. Review your Rules of Evidence (and this post).
Incorporate pauses to draw attention to key parts of the testimony. Think through your and your witness’s physical movements, particularly if exhibits are being used. Consider the body language the witness and attorney use.
The First 15 Seconds Are the Most Important. As you’re preparing your direct examination, pay special attention to the first 15 (ish) seconds. This is when your audience is paying the most attention. Whenever there is a pause or a change in the flow of the trial, your audience is on alert. So when a new witness takes ...
Your direct examination should be similar. You don’t want it to be a script that you perform the exact same way for every scrimmage and competition . Almost always, mock trial direct examinations are scripted word for word.
A: [ in one sentence, victim explains any history he had with the defendant and how he was victimized] Yes, she actually used to be an instructor at my studio. Little did I know that instead of searching for bliss, she was searching for things to steal from the studio!