If however, in an unlikely event, a patent attorney attempts to steal your idea and make it their own or divulges information about an invention in order to attract some gain; the step to take is to contact the Bar Association. Afterwards, it is crucial that you find another attorney to seek litigation against the unscrupulous patent attorney.
Full Answer
Most inventors have been made to grapple with the misguided thought that a patent attorney may for some reason steal an idea and make it their own. Nothing can however be far from the truth since ethical duty to a client restricts a patent attorney from stealing an idea or disclosing any information about an innovation.
Some ways that you can ensure you keep others involved—and thus have the independent record necessary in the case of patent theft—is to work with suppliers and customers as you craft an invention that reflects the realities of what can be made for a profit, and that people will want to actually buy.
Due to the patent attorneys being professionals in other disciplines where they may actually be cream of the crop, an idea that comes to them within the niche they have specialized in may be at risk since they may opt to stela and pursue the idea.
But, if it appears that someone has patented your invention out from under you, you’re going to need the assistance of a patent lawyer. Derivation and interference proceedings are not for the faint of heart. You’re going to face a serious uphill climb, and you will need to have legal representation on hand.
However, patent lawyers are bound by ethics and professional responsibility requirements. Stealing an idea would be a serious breach of duty for a lawyer that can expose him or her to punishments from the bar, and the original inventor would likely be able to sue for theft.
As soon as you file a patent application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), your invention is "Patent Pending." Once your application is submitted, nobody can steal, sell, or use your invention without your permission.
By attaching a copy of the patent, you have now put the infringer on notice about the patent, and any further use of that patent will be willful and subject to enhanced damages, in the event of litigation.
Four Ways to Stop Someone from Stealing Your IdeaTrade Secrets. Trade secrets are generally the least expensive strategy to keep an idea from being taken. ... Copyrights. Copyrights are generally the second least expensive strategy to protect a piece of work. ... Trademarks. ... Patents.
To protect your invention, you must apply for a patent. Unlike copyrights, there is no such thing as an automatic patent. Obtaining a patent can be slow and costly, taking up to 2 years and costing in the six figure range.
Because the barrier to entry is so high, only inventors who are backed by a powerful licensee have a chance of defending their intellectual property ownership using the legal system. So, take it from me: I learned firsthand that having a patent doesn't stop someone from stealing your idea.
Patent infringement is not a crime, so there are no criminal penalties. It is a civil matter, and one of the reasons why patent infringement is so common is because the civil penalties are not severe.
Since the essence of the right granted by a patent is the right to exclude others from commercial exploitation of the invention, the patent holder is the only one who may make, use, or sell the invention. Others may do so only with the authorization of the patent holder.
Can a patent be revoked? A patent can be revoked if an aggrieved party files patent opposition or revocation proceedings to disprove the claims of the person who was granted the patent of their right of exclusivity.
In some industries, patents are absolutely critical. But in far more they are not. It's a well-known fact that a vast majority of patents are worthless. Around 97% of all patents never recoup the cost of filing them.
According to United States patent law, anyone who "invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent." So the short answer is yes. If you don't patent it first, someone else can!
Many inventors wonder if they need a prototype prior to patenting an invention. The simple answer is “no'. A prototype is not required prior to filing a patent application with the U.S. Patent Office. While prototypes can be valuable in developing your invention, they can also be costly.
Some inventors have been made to believe some theories that suggest there is a grey area that patent attorneys can exploit to steal your idea. For instance, when an inventor simply calls in to get some basic information about the patent process and the fees associated with the same, should they be considered a client for simply enquiring? The theory being peddled is that technically, they may not be regarded as a client and that is what provides the grey area since a patent attorney may be ethically bound to a client but not obligated to keep the information about an enquiry confidential.
On the first theory, it has to be noted that patent attorneys, like other law professionals, have a duty of confidentiality to the client and may not divulge any information they receive. It is actually in state law that confidentiality is paramount to the practice.
An inventor should get a lawyer to draft a Non-Disclosure Agreement and then take the same to a patent attorney to sign before initiating a conversation which will now make sure that any information shared remains confidential.
The bottom line is that federal rules demand that the information a client provides to a patent attorney is kept confidential. This means that a patent attorney, even without being notified of the same, is obligated to keep the information and only use it to benefit the client and not themselves or any other secondary party.
Some ways that you can ensure you keep others involved—and thus have the independent record necessary in the case of patent theft—is to work with suppliers and customers as you craft an invention that reflects the realities of what can be made for a profit, and that people will want to actually buy.
Part I: A construction of the claims detailed in the copycat’s patent application. This construction “translates” the application’s claims into plainspoken English, to better understand the scope of the invention.
Jie was wise not to buy MacKay’s patent. Jie notes in her writeup that she chose not to buy the patent because it’s likely invalid. But in general, utility patents like MacKay’s don’t have much value. What makes patents truly valuable is if they have pending continuation applications, as these allow inventors to expand the scope of their patent’s claims and improve their enforceability. As it stands, it would be fairly easy for a would-be competitor to MacKay to study the claims and work around them. But a continuation application would make the patent’s scope nebulous and uncertain, and claims could be adjusted to encompass the work of impatient competitors.
But despite this success, she chose not to patent her work, as she wanted others to feel free to explore her ideas and build upon them.
Part II: An examination of how the real inventor (you) developed the entirety of your invention, in extreme detail and backed by detailed evidence. This is typically the biggest hurdle to clear, as the USPTO uses a “heightened pleading standard,” which means that you must provide evidence—via documents not produced by you, or from records of communications between you and another party—that you invented each and every claim element before the earliest priority date of the infringing patent application.
What makes patents truly valuable is if they have pending continuation applications, as these allow inventors to expand the scope of their patent’s claims and improve their enforceability. As it stands, it would be fairly easy for a would-be competitor to MacKay to study the claims and work around them.
Bear in mind, prevailing in a derivation proceeding is extremely difficult. To date, only three individuals have been able to provide the evidence necessary to win their case.