how to access old minnesota attorney general opinions

Where can I find Minnesota Attorney General (AG) opinions?

Opinions from 1993 to present can be found on the Attorney General's web site. In the Law Library, if the opinion you are seeking has a cite by page number, it will be found in the print volumes of the Biennial Report of the Attorney General to the Governor of the State of Minnesota, The Biennial Report, however, contains only selected opinions. If you have a classification …

Where can I get a copy of an attorney general’s opinion?

Jan 28, 2022 · Attorney General opinions from 1993 to current are available upon request by contacting the Attorney General's office (email) [email protected] (phone) 651-757-1055. Please provide the opinion number, date and topic when requesting opinions copies to ensure the correct opinion is supplied.

What does the Attorney General of Minnesota do for Minnesota?

Many people who contact the Minnesota Office of the Attorney General are seeking some type of legal opinion. However, the Attorney General is authorized by statute to issue written legal opinions only to constitutional executive officers, state agencies, bodies of the state legislature, and attorneys for local governments or pension funds.

What does the Attorney General’s office do?

A complete set of opinions from 1858 to date on microfiche is available from the Minnesota Attorney General’s Library. These opinions are arranged both chronologically and by subject classification number. Due to the complexity of locating Minnesota Attorney General Opinions, it is recommended to consult with a law librarian or the Attorney General’s Library staff. There is …

What is the final decision of the Bureau of Mediation Services?

Stat. § 14.63 (2020), if the arbitrator was selected pursuant to the procedures in Minn. Stat. § 43A.33, subd. 3 (2020), in response to an appeal by a state employee who is not covered by a collective bargaining agreement and is grieving the employee's discharge, suspension without pay, or demotion.

What is the appeal from a civil contempt judgment?

In this appeal from a civil contempt judgment and the underlying temporary injunction requiring compliance with the governor’s COVID-19 executive order restricting restaurant service, appellant- restaurant argues that enforcement of the executive order violates appellant’s constitutional right to equal protection in that restaurants located on Indian reservations in the state were exempted from the order. Because we conclude that the executive order does not violate appellant’s constitutional right to equal protection, we affirm. Respondent-state also brought a motion to dismiss the appeal for mootness. Because we conclude that the issues raised by the appeal are not moot, the state’s motion to dismiss is denied.

What is the appellant's challenge to the district court?

Appellant challenges findings and conclusions of the district court regarding the existence of private nuisances upon an access easement, the scope of injunctive relief ordered, the preclusion of expert testimony, the related denial of a motion for a partial new trial, and the denial of appellant’s request for attorney fees. We affirm in part and remand.

What is the appellant's challenge to the involuntary termination of parental rights?

Appellant mother challenges the involuntary termination of her parental rights, arguing that (1) the record does not support the finding that respondent agency made reasonable efforts to reunite appellant with the child, (2) the district court abused its discretion by determining that respondent proved statutory grounds for termination, and (3) the district court abused its discretion by determining that termination is in the child’s best interests. We affirm.

What is the father's claim in the parenting time dispute?

In this parenting-time dispute, self-represented appellant-father asserts that the district court abused its discretion by suspending his parenting time and determining that he is a frivolous litigant . Father also claims violations of the First Amendment and Sixth Amendment, improper use of a prior domestic-abuse no-contact order (DANCO), that the district court judge violated a criminal statute, and various errors in transcripts underlying this proceeding. We affirm.

Briefs

Minnesota State Law Library Brief Archive (2005 - Present): Briefs for cases argued before the Minnesota Supreme Court are loaded into the Minnesota State Law Library Brief Archive on a weekly basis.

Oral Arguments

The Minnesota Judicial Branch maintains a searchable, online database of archived Supreme Court oral arguments. The database contains videos of oral arguments from September 2005 to the present. As of January 1, 2019 there is also an online database of Court of Appeals oral arguments.

Description

Learn more about a specific topic and how to connect to additional services.

Additional Information

Provides consumers with information on how to protect themselves from fraud and general information on personal finance, large purchases, and a variety of topics including: