Unfortunately, you cannot pick and choose an 18-B attorney. If your friend is represented by the Legal Aid Society and is not satisfied with his attorney, he can ask the judge for a new lawyer. If he can provide valid reasons for his dissatisfaction, the judge will appoint an 18-B attorney to represent him.
Full Answer
Aug 24, 2020 · 1. How do I get an 18B/Panel attorney? Judges determine who is eligible for 18B counsel. Therefore, before you are appointed an 18B attorney a judge must make a determination that you are indigent and cannot afford to hire private counsel. This …
Jan 19, 2016 · You can't obtain an 18b lawyer. Your only role is to support him emotionally. If you have any knowledge of the crime then speak with his lawyer. If he can't afford a lawyer one will be appointed. He doesn't get to choose 18b or legal aid
Feb 17, 2010 · Avvo Rating: 9.1. Criminal Defense Attorney in Central Islip, NY. Reveal number. tel: (631) 234-1650. Private message. Call. Message. Posted on Feb 18, 2010. Generally you wont be entiltled to changing attorneys without good reason, or specific issue, generally lack of visitation is generally not one of them...
18-B Criminal Application. 18-B Criminal Re-Cert Only Application. 18-B Family Application. 18-B Family Re-Cert Only Application.
You can't obtain an 18b lawyer. Your only role is to support him emotionally. If you have any knowledge of the crime then speak with his lawyer. If he can't afford a lawyer one will be appointed. He doesn't get to choose 18b or legal aid#N#More
If he is indigent the Judge will appoint a public defender. It might be a legal aid or it might be an 18b. He does not get to chose.
Is your friend charged with 2nd degree manslaughter or murder? Typically, murder cases are assigned to 18A attorneys and not 18B attorneys. However, with that said your friend should contact his assigned attorney and request a jail visit. Preferably he should document any requests in writing.
Generally you wont be entiltled to changing attorneys without good reason, or specific issue, generally lack of visitation is generally not one of them...#N#He would have to make such a request to the judge presiding over his case, and explain why... if granted the court would grant him another attorney.
In criminal cases, the right to counsel, which attaches at arraignment if not sooner, and lasts until the disposition of the case, now clearly encompasses the right to counsel at first appearance in New York.28 Often, the early stages of a criminal case are the most critical because it is then that,
Eligibility determinations shall take into account the actual cost of retaining a private attorney in the relevant jurisdiction for the type of family law case or category of crime charged.
For nearly four decades, New York courts have recognized that, under County Law § 722, financial inability to afford counsel is “not synonymous with destitution or a total absence of means.”2 Indeed, as the American Bar Association explains, “[n]o state uses only ‘indigency’ as
A presumption of eligibility is rebuttable only where there is compelling evidence that the applicant has the financial resources sufficient to pay for a qualified attorney and the other expenses necessary for effective representation.
Written notice and explanation of a denial of assignment of counsel, as well as the right to ask that a denial be reconsidered or appealed, are fundamental to the fairness and transparency of the eligibility determination process . Written denials ensure clear communication and provide a record of all ineligibility determinations and the reasons for these determinations. Written decisions may also enhance an applicant’s acceptance of the denial, particularly where it is clear that the denial is consistent with these Standards. Reconsideration and appeal processes provide a mechanism by which to review eligibility denials to ensure that such denial is consistent with these Standards.
As stated in the commentary to Standard XIII, it is important to maintain the integrity of the eligibility determination process to ensure that counsel is being assigned to those who cannot afford the costs of effective representation, and not to those who can. Thus, there may be times when a change in the financial circumstances of the person receiving mandated representation warrants a re-examination of the continued assignment of counsel. However, the eligibility determination should be re-examined only when there is concrete evidence that the financial circumstances of the person receiving mandated representation have substantially changed such that the person is now able to afford the costs of qualified counsel and the expenses necessary for effective representation.