Mar 28, 2018 · Attorney-client privilege is difficult for businesses because usually no one individual represents the business. An attorney may need to speak with a CEO to find out information about how a company was started or major business decisions, speak with a CFO about finances, and speak with the COO about company operations.
a. identify your client – will you meet alone with the prospective client or in the presence of a non-client and what steps will you take to preserve the attorney client privilege; b. are you competent to handle the matter; c. are you able to devote the time and effort necessary to adequately represent the prospective client; d.
Nov 02, 2009 · THE CPA’S CHECKLIST FOR SELECTING . THE RIGHT BUSINESS ENTITY FORM. By: Keith A. Wood, Attorney, CPA. November 2, 2009 . Carruthers & Roth, P.A. 235 N. Edgeworth Street . Greensboro, NC 27401 . Telephone: (336) 478-1185 . Fax: (336) 273-7885. [email protected]. INTRODUCTION. Without a doubt, one of the most important decisions facing …
Use this checklist to ensure that you are taking all the major steps to successfully establish the attorney-client relationship or decline representation. o Have receptionist or staff member complete initial section of Consultation Form. o Have staff member do initial conflicts check, making any judgment calls yourself.
Attorney-client privilege is one of the most important protections afforded to litigants in a lawsuit. This privilege protects all communications that occur between an attorney and a client for purposes of seeking or receiving legal advice. This means that clients and their attorneys can talk without restraint, ...
When setting up a relationship with outside counsel, or considering how to navigate communications with general counsel within your company, you should consider consulting with a business litigation attorney. Thanks to the lack of certainty in this area of the law, standards and recommendations may shift, and new law is always being created.
lawyer’s duties and obligations to his or her client are manifold in any retainer, but are especially relevant in cases where vulnerability, capacity and undue influence are at issue . As Cullity J. stated in Banton v. Banton, “A very high degree of professionalism may be required in borderline cases where it is possible that the client's wishes may be in conflict with his or her best interests and counsel's duty to the Court.”1 The duties and obligations owed to a client arise from professional rules, statutes, and jurisprudence – in addition to a lawyer’s own professional and ethical judgments – and should serve as guidance for lawyers in navigating issues of capacity, undue influence, and vulnerability.
In this case, the deceased, Murray Walman, married his second wife, Estelle, in 1991, and made 3 wills, in 2003, 2005, and 2007, as well as several dispositions of capital property that benefitted Estelle . Murray had three sons from a previous marriage. The net effect of the 2007 will and property transfers was to leave the entirety of Murray’s estate to Estelle – save $5,000 to $10,000 to be divided between Murray’s sons.
Undue influence is separate but related to the concept of capacity. Therefore, it is possible that an individual is capable with respect to a decision, but that the presence of undue influence renders that decision invalid. It is therefore important for lawyers to investigate the potential for both incapacity and undue influence in the course of a retainer.
The SDA also creates a special type of retainer between a lawyer and a client where that client’s capacity is at issue in a proceeding. A lawyer in these cases is appointed under s. 3 of the SDA and so is referred to as Section 3 counsel. While all of the regular duties owed by a lawyer to his or her client apply to Section 3 counsel, there isn’t a standard “retainer” between Section 3 counsel and their client; instead, the court orders the retention of Section 3 counsel to fulfill a specific statutory role.
As vulnerability is not a legal doctrine, there is no onus on either party to litigation to prove or disprove vulnerability; instead, it is typically apparent on the facts, and if present, will be considered in the court’s analysis of capacity and/or undue influence. Incapacity and undue influence, meanwhile, must generally be proven by the party seeking to attack the validity of a legal document, as capacity to make a certain decision is typically presumed at law. However, there are two situations in which the onus will shift to the party defending the validity of document: 1) when the court finds that there are suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of a document; and 2) with respect to certain contracts or transactions, depending on the relationship between the parties. The presence or absence of incapacity and undue influence must be proved on the civil standard of a balance of probabilities.
The Canadian law of wills and estates has developed from the more than one-thousand-year-old tradition of British common law; needless to say, many centuries of jurisprudence have created a myriad of legal tests and imposed a variety of duties on lawyers. These tests and duties have changed over time in accordance with new social norms and technological advancement, meaning that one of the fundamental characteristics of the common law is that it is always subject to change at the discretion of judges. This is one reason why, to come full circle, one of the standard professional duties of lawyers is to engage in continuing legal education.
person is mentally capable of entering into a marriage contract only if he/she has the capacity to understand the nature of the contract and the duties and responsibilities it creates.54