After a suspect has been indicted and has obtained counsel, he has a right to have counsel present during a lineup; if the lineup is conducted without counsel's presence, evidence of any ID made there cannot be used in court. This is the " Wade-Gilbert rule." Attachment of the Right to Counsel
Full Answer
Aug 18, 2010 · Defendants are afforded a Sixth Amendment right to counsel at “critical stages” of their prosecution. Additionally, they held that, if the police conduct such a lineup without notice to the defendant’s attorney and in the attorney’s absence, they are violating the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The rationale behind this rule is that a lineup in the absence of …
Feb 01, 2006 · After a suspect has been indicted and has obtained counsel, he has a right to have counsel present during a lineup; if the lineup is conducted without counsel's presence, evidence of any ID made there cannot be used in court. This is the " Wade-Gilbert rule." Attachment of the Right to Counsel.
T/F, The rule that suspect in a lineup or other face to face identification confrontation who has been formally charged is entitled to have a lawyer present is known as the Wade-Gilbert rule. True T/F, The current rule in federal and many state courts that scientific evidence is admissible if it will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or determine a fact in issue, is known as …
May 02, 2017 · However, at the time, Barry was not afforded legal representation nor did he waive his right to have one present at the lineup. The prosecutor intends to use the outcome of the lineup—which resulted in the victim identifying Barry as the perpetrator—at trial.
The right to counsel and to due process apply in lineups, showups, and photographic identification. T/F: The role of the defendant's lawyer at a lineup is to control the proceedings.
Which of the following rights at identification procedures is dependent upon whether or not the suspect has been formally charged or subjected to adversary judicial proceedings? the crime.
The U.S. Supreme Court has adopted the theory of total incorporation. All portions of the First, Fourth, and Sixth Amendments have been incorporated. The rights of free speech, press, and religion are found in the First Amendment.
When a pretrial identification procedure has been deemed unnecessarily suggestive, the witness's in-court identification may be allowed if the prosecution can show by clear and convincing evidence that the witness's identification is independent of the tainted pretrial identification procedure.
When the suspect exercises their 6th Amendment right to have an attorney present during a lineup the attorney can... ... observe the lineup. ...a document ordering a person to appear in court to testify.
Which of the following rights has NOT been incorporated? The right to a jury trial in a civil case has not yet been incorporated.
In a criminal proceeding, a defendant may enter a plea of nolo contendere, in which the defendant does not accept or deny responsibility for the charges but agrees to accept punishment. The plea differs from a guilty plea because a "no contest" plea cannot be used against the defendant in another cause of action.
More commonly, it is argued that incorporation began in the case Gitlow v. New York (1925), in which the Court expressly held that States were bound to protect freedom of speech. Since that time, the Court has steadily incorporated most of the significant provisions of the Bill of Rights.
Because the constitutional right to counsel exists to provide a lawyer's assistance for an accused layman both at trial and during "critical stages" of pretrial procedures, this right only applies to cases where adversary judicial proceedings have begun. In the past, some courts tried to expand this protection to cover any "closely related" cases as well.
Law enforcement officers are quite familiar with the court-created "right" to counsel established by the Miranda opinion, to protect the Fifth Amendment trial privilege against compelled self-incrimination. But it applies only during police custodial interrogation.
Not all states use a grand jury indictment to charge defendants. Some use a criminal complaint or other means. To cover the various procedures that might trigger the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the court eventually declared that the right to counsel would attach by any process (including "formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment") that might be used to initiate "adversary judicial proceedings" ( Kirby v. Illinois ). This means that in most jurisdictions, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel will arise either at the time of indictment or of the first court appearance after formal charges, whichever comes first.
Once the Sixth Amendment right to counsel has attached, any statements elicited by your agents, even undercover, cannot be admitted to prove guilt on the charged crime ( U.S. v. Henry). However, you can ask informants to report any volunteered statements the defendant makes on his own, provided you do not instruct the informant to provoke discussions and do not give him or her any incentive to do so.