4. the concept of attorney competence was defined by the u.s. supreme court in what case?

by Prof. Winifred Ritchie II 8 min read

The concept of attorney competence was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Strickland v. Washington. The prosecution uses an adversarial procedure to obtain the truth when trying to determine guilt.

What are the standards for determining competency and conduct of hearing?

The concept of attorney competence was defined by the US Supreme Court in the case of Strickland v. Washington In the 1984 case of Strickland v. Washington, the Supreme Court set forth the standard to be used in evaluating ineffectiveness of counsel claims. In …

How do you determine if a defendant is competent to stand trial?

Nov 10, 2019 · Question 3 4 out of 4 points 4. The concept of attorney competence was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in what case? Selected Answer: Strickland v. Washington Correct Answer: Strickland v. Washington

What does it mean to be represented by counsel in court?

Feb 16, 2019 · The concept of attorney competence was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in what case? Selected Answer: Correct Strickland v. …

Which of the following statements is true regarding the US Supreme Court's decision in Gideon?

Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright? The Court declared that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.

Which US Supreme Court decision acknowledged a defendant's right to self representation?

A. Faretta v. California recognized that the Sixth Amendment protects a criminal defendant's right to represent himself. 422 U.S. 806 (1975).

Which of the following is the most common reason cases are rejected by prosecutors?

14 Cards in this SetThe U.S. Supreme Court is the only court established by constitutional mandateTrueAll evidence points to the conclusion that prosecutorial discretion is used toScreen out the weakest casesWhich of the following is the most common reason for prosecutors to reject casesEvidence problems11 more rows

What was the principle finding of the Kansas City study quizlet?

What was the principle finding of the Kansas City study? There is little evidence that police patrol deters crime.

In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court hold that indigent defendants charged with a felony are entitled to the services of a lawyer paid for by the government?

Gideon v. WainwrightOn March 18, 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, unanimously holding that defendants facing serious criminal charges have a right to counsel at state expense if they cannot afford one.Oct 24, 2018

In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court hold that indigent defendants charged with a felony are entitled to the services of a lawyer paid for by the government quizlet?

In a landmark decision, the US Supreme Court held that, based on the Sixth Amendment's provision of right to counsel, indigent defendants charged with a felony are entitled to services of a lawyer paid for by the government (Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963).

Which of the following is the most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute a suspect?

The most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute is: if there is sufficient evidence for conviction.

What happens when a case is dismissed in court?

Having a case dismissed with or without prejudice determines whether or not a case is permanently closed. When a case is dismissed with prejudice, it's closed for good. Neither party can reopen the case at a later date, and the matter is considered permanently resolved.

Why do prosecutors sometimes choose not to prosecute criminal cases?

No likelihood of success. Prosecutors may decline to press charges because they think it unlikely that a conviction will result. No matter what the prosecutor's personal feelings about the case, the prosecutor needs legally admissible evidence sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

What was the main finding of the Kansas City preventive patrol experiment quizlet?

What were the major findings of the Kansas city preventive patrol experiment? Variations in the level of preventive patrol had no effect on crime, community attitudes toward police, police response time, or traffic accidents.

What did the Kansas City Patrol study in 1972 and 1973 demonstrate quizlet?

What did the Kansas City patrol study in 1972 and 1973 demonstrate? The traditional three goals of policing were not the most effective way to do police work. When communicating with a citizen, what can an officer do to master what the citizen is saying?

Which of the following was a finding from the Kansas City Rapid Response study?

What was the most significant finding in the Kansas City Rapid Response Study? Citizens must call the police immediately after a crime had occurred.

What is the meaning of 4241?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 4241 (a), the court must order a competency hearing. ...if there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him ...

What is the order of a court to order a psychiatric examination?

Prior to the date of the hearing, the court may order that a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant be conducted, and that a psychiatric or psychological report be filed with the court pursuant to the provisions of Section 4247.