The concept of attorney competence was defined by the US Supreme Court in the case of Strickland v. Washington In the 1984 case of Strickland v. Washington, the Supreme Court set forth the standard to be used in evaluating ineffectiveness of counsel claims. In …
Nov 10, 2019 · Question 3 4 out of 4 points 4. The concept of attorney competence was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in what case? Selected Answer: Strickland v. Washington Correct Answer: Strickland v. Washington
Feb 16, 2019 · The concept of attorney competence was defined by the U.S. Supreme Court in what case? Selected Answer: Correct Strickland v. …
Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright? The Court declared that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.
A. Faretta v. California recognized that the Sixth Amendment protects a criminal defendant's right to represent himself. 422 U.S. 806 (1975).
14 Cards in this SetThe U.S. Supreme Court is the only court established by constitutional mandateTrueAll evidence points to the conclusion that prosecutorial discretion is used toScreen out the weakest casesWhich of the following is the most common reason for prosecutors to reject casesEvidence problems11 more rows
What was the principle finding of the Kansas City study? There is little evidence that police patrol deters crime.
Gideon v. WainwrightOn March 18, 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, unanimously holding that defendants facing serious criminal charges have a right to counsel at state expense if they cannot afford one.Oct 24, 2018
In a landmark decision, the US Supreme Court held that, based on the Sixth Amendment's provision of right to counsel, indigent defendants charged with a felony are entitled to services of a lawyer paid for by the government (Gideon v. Wainwright, 1963).
The most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute is: if there is sufficient evidence for conviction.
Having a case dismissed with or without prejudice determines whether or not a case is permanently closed. When a case is dismissed with prejudice, it's closed for good. Neither party can reopen the case at a later date, and the matter is considered permanently resolved.
No likelihood of success. Prosecutors may decline to press charges because they think it unlikely that a conviction will result. No matter what the prosecutor's personal feelings about the case, the prosecutor needs legally admissible evidence sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
What were the major findings of the Kansas city preventive patrol experiment? Variations in the level of preventive patrol had no effect on crime, community attitudes toward police, police response time, or traffic accidents.
What did the Kansas City patrol study in 1972 and 1973 demonstrate? The traditional three goals of policing were not the most effective way to do police work. When communicating with a citizen, what can an officer do to master what the citizen is saying?
What was the most significant finding in the Kansas City Rapid Response Study? Citizens must call the police immediately after a crime had occurred.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 4241 (a), the court must order a competency hearing. ...if there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him ...
Prior to the date of the hearing, the court may order that a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant be conducted, and that a psychiatric or psychological report be filed with the court pursuant to the provisions of Section 4247.