If you have an attorney, then most likely he received the interrogatories and has sent them to you with instructions to answer them. He has probably already identified the ones that deserve legal objections, and he will handle that part of it.
Written interrogatories are a powerful discovery tool for claimants in workers compensation cases. Written answers from the employer and insurer can verify known facts, narrow the legal issues in your case, show what defenses you’ll need to overcome, identify those persons whose deposition you should take, and locate important documents.
Format the interrogatories properly according to the court rules in your jurisdiction. An improperly formatted set of interrogatories could give your opponent grounds for an objection and slow down the discovery process.
Interrogatories are lists of questions sent to the other party that s/he must respond to in writing. You can use interrogatories to find out facts about a case but they cannot be used for questions that draw a legal conclusion.
The purpose of interrogatories is to learn a great deal of general information about a party in a lawsuit. For example, the defendant in a personal injury lawsuit about a car accident might send you interrogatories asking you to disclose things like: Where you live.
Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a pre-trial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from the other party or parties by means of discovery devices such as interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admissions and ...
Interrogatories are a helpful discovery tool for obtaining written answers to questions directed to your opponent — which you can use to support your claims or defenses in a lawsuit.
What happens once you receive an interrogatory? All of the questions must be responded to in writing and it must be done under oath. Often, once you answer the questions, the other side will use the answers to gather more information.
Interrogatories are a part of the "discovery" stage of a civil case. After a lawsuit is filed and the defendant answers the complaint, the parties engage in discovery. (Get details on the steps in a personal injury lawsuit.) During discovery, the parties request and exchange information and documents.
If they produce documents which prove not to be producible under R. 7-1(1), they may be guilty of breaching their client's confidence; yet if they decline to produce they may breach their duty as officer of the court.
Evidence, such as a statement, tending to excuse, justify, or absolve the alleged fault or guilt of a defendant.
Most civil cases are settled by mutual agreement between the parties. A dispute can be settled even before a suit is filed. Once a suit is filed, it can be settled before the trial begins, during the trial, while the jury is deliberating, or even after a verdict is rendered.
Interrogatories can be quicker, less costly, and less complicated than depositions, but there are downsides. Since the questions are written, the witness may have more time to think and craft answers, rather than providing more candid answers during discovery.
Primary tabs. In a civil action, an interrogatory is a list of questions one party sends to another as part of the discovery process. The recipient must answer the questions under oath and according to the case's schedule.
Their use was usually the first volley in the discovery battle. For years the Courts had found that the Form Interrogatories were objection proof as to form with minor exceptions.
The most common discovery objection our lawyers see is the objection that the interrogatories are not relevant to the litigation or are too burdens...
You should draft interrogatories contention interrogatories and other interrogatories seeking specific responses narrowly. But a big part of interr...
General objections are a list of general objections that presumably apply to all responses to the discovery requests. General objections are almost...
You will need to send a copy to every party in the case. The original must be sent directly to the requesting attorney or self-represented party who sent the interrogatories. In some cases, there may be more than one plaintiff, or more than one defendant.
When you get them, look them over immediately since you only have 30 days to respond. If you have an attorney, go through the questions together, briefly discuss your answers, and identify if any are objectionable. For example, contest questions that are vague, ask multiple questions, or assume facts. As you answer the questions, keep narrative ones concise , answer “yes-or-no” questions simply, and complete “list” questions as thoroughly as possible. To learn how to properly format your questions, keep reading!
You need to send a copy of your responses to everyone involved in the case. Complete and return the interrogatory answers within 30 days. Under most circumstances and in most states, you must answer and return the responses to interrogatories within 30 days of receiving them.
In legal terms, a “verified” answer is one that you have signed at the end. You need to include a statement at the end of your interrogatory answers that says, “I verify under oath that the answers to these interrogatories are true to the best of my ability,” and then sign it.
Use the proper heading for your interrogatory responses. Interrogatory responses should be headed with the “caption” of your lawsuit. This will include the name of the court centered at the top of the page, the name of the case (e.g., “Smith, Plaintiff, vs. Jones, Defendant”), and the case number, something like CV-16-12345 (the case number will have been assigned by the court clerk when the case was filed and needs to appear on all documents). Then you will title the paper, “Defendant’s Answers to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories” (assuming that you are the defendant and this was the first set).
Interrogatories are written questions sent to someone involved in a legal matter. These questions are usually sent by the opposing party and must be directly related to the matter at hand. Your responses must be truthful, complete, and returned in a timely manner. If you are represented by an attorney, he or she will guide you through the process.
State any objections in the space where the answer would go. You do not list objections separately. If you have any objections to particular interrogatories, you will present them instead of an answer. If you can answer part of a question but part of it is objectionable, then answer what you can and object to the rest. For example, the following might be what your response would look like if you were involved in a case about a car accident:
If the other side objects to or fails to answer interrogatories, the requesting party should make a good faith effort to work through the other side's objections or failures. If that does not work, the requesting party can file a Motion to Compel.
Interrogatories are useful for defining broad categories of evidence, such as the names of witnesses, the subject matter of their testimony and the location of documents. Interrogatories can also ask the opposing party to describe the factual bases for a claim or defense and for a factual computation of claimed damages.
striking pleadings; ordering designated facts be taken as true; staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed; rendering judgment against the disobedient party; dis missing the action or. holding the disobedient party in contempt of court, except for an order to submit to a physical or mental examination.
The Civil Rules include Rule 33, which allows parties to ask the other party questions, in writing, which the other party must answer under oath.
The responding party has 28 to 30 days to answer, depending on the court, unless the parties agree to, or the court orders, a shorter or longer time to respond . The responding party must answer or object to each interrogatory.
If the other side objects to or fails to answer interrogatories, the requesting party should make a good faith effort to work through the other side's objections or failures. If that does not work, the requesting party can file a Motion to Compel. If court grants a motion to compel and the other party still refuses to produce the discovery, the court can sanction the disobedient party by: 1 prohibiting the disobedient party from introducing evidence or supporting or opposing claims or defenses on designated matters; 2 striking pleadings; 3 ordering designated facts be taken as true; 4 staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed; 5 rendering judgment against the disobedient party; 6 dismissing the action or 7 holding the disobedient party in contempt of court, except for an order to submit to a physical or mental examination.
Each case turns on its own facts. However, employment litigants rarely have all of the facts that they need to prove their claims in their possession. Instead, they must usually obtain documents and testimony from the employer and other witnesses. A court’s Rules of Civil Procedure (its “Civil Rules”) empower them to do this.
But this is an adversarial process. There are times when you should not give complete answers to an interrogatory because the question is objectionable. Practically, discovery objections also allow you to avoid answering difficult questions.
Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory because it calls for the plaintiff to make a legal conclusion. [Don't go crazy with this one either. “An interrogatory is not objectionable merely because it asks for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, but the court may order that the interrogatory need not be answered until designated discovery is complete, or until a pretrial conference or some other time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 (a) (2).]
Federal Rule 33 (b) (4) emphasizes that the "grounds for objecting to an interrogatory must be stated with specificity. Any ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the court, for good cause, excuses the failure."
The most common discovery objection our lawyers see is the objection that the interrogatories are not relevant to the litigation or are too burdensome to answer. Another objection our attorneys see frequently because we asked detailed questions that pin down defendants is that the request calls for a legal conclusion. The legal conclusion objection is rarely a valid objection.
Under Maryland law, this onus is on the party receiving the objection to force the issue. Just like you can take advantage of lazy or distracted lawyers by forcing answers to your interrogatories, you can also gain an advantage by not answering interrogatories that are arguably objectionable. The filing of timely discovery objections defers the requirement to answer the question until the defendant objects to your objections.
Generally, interrogatories are objectionable if they seek information that is not within the scope of discovery as defined in Maryland Rule 402 or Federal Rule 26 (b). These are typically requests that are not relevant, unduly burdensome, broad, vague, privileged. or protected by the work product doctrine. Sample interrogatories in all types of ...
Plaintiff objects because the identification, photocopying, and production of the requested documents would be oppressively burdensome and costly. The information or documents will be made available for review at its storage location during business hours at a mutually convenient time. Alternatively, upon request the plaintiff will provide the defendant with an estimate of what it would cost to procure and produce these documents and the parties can agree on the cost of such a production. (This is usually a defendant's objection, actually. Federal Rule 26 (g), requiring parties to consider discovery burdens and benefits before requesting discovery or responding or objecting to discovery requests and to certify that their discovery requests, responses, and objections meet the rule requirements.)
Second, serve interrogatories when an employer files a change-in-condition application to stop workers comp benefits that you disagree with.
Interrogatories help discover facts in every type of workers compensation claim . Here is a checklist of information that you can collect with interrogatories: The identity of all persons who witnessed the workplace accident and a summary of what they will testify to; The identity of all persons the defendants might call to testify at ...
An interrogatory is a written question that one party sends to another during the workers compensation claim process. Interrogatories are a set of written questions served on an opposing party in your claim.
In Virginia, you do not need to ask the Workers Compensation Commission for permission to send interrogatories if you serve them on the employer or its insurer more than 21 days before ...
Though some objections are valid, in my experience most of the objections to written interrogatories are made to avoid answering discovery. Common objections that serve no purpose other than to ignore a valid interrogatory include: 1 The question is vague 2 The question is overly broad 3 The question is unduly burdensome 4 The claimant bears the burden of proof
The workers compensation discovery process is the method to learn the facts relevant to your case, both good and bad. Written interrogatories are a powerful discovery tool for claimants in workers compensation cases. Written answers from the employer and insurer can verify known facts, narrow the legal issues in your case, ...
But workers compensation interrogatories are not the time or method to get all those answers. Rule 1.8 (H) of the Rules of the Workers Compensation Commission governs the scope of interrogatories in Virginia. You must limit interrogatories to contested issues.
For any interrogatory or part of an interrogatory which you refuse to answer under a claim of privilege, submit a sworn or certified statement from your counsel or one of your employees in which you identify the nature of the information withheld; specify the grounds of the claimed privilege and the paragraph of these interrogatories to which the information is responsive; and identify each person to whom the information, or any part thereof, has been disclosed.
For the purpose of these Interrogatories only, Plaintiff has used the definitions set forth below. As used in these Interrogatories: 1. "Agreement" means a contract, arrangement, or understanding, formal or informal, oral or written, between two or more persons.
"Exclusive arrangement with a dental laboratory or dentist" means any proposed or actual agreement, arrangement, policy, program, practice, term or condition of your company that: a. requires any dental laboratory or dentist to limit the use of, or refrain from using, the products of any other person; or.
14. "Including" means including, but not limited to.
Without limitation on the term "control" as used in the preceding paragraph, a document is deemed to be in your control if you have the right to secure the document or a copy thereof from another person.
8. No agreement, understanding, or stipulation by the Department of Justice or any of its representatives purporting to modify, limit, or otherwise vary these interrogatories shall be valid or binding on the Department of Justice unless confirmed or acknowledged in writing (or made of record in open court) by a duly authorized representative thereof.
INTERROGATORY NO. 1: State your full name, address, date of birth, marital status, and social security number.
We make few objections to these interrogatories because most of the inquiries is very reasonable . If you are facing interrogatories that are less reasonable , we provide a complete list of interrogatory objections .
ANSWER NO. 10: Plaintiff refers Defendant to his medical records and bills attached to his Responses to Defendant’s Requests for Production of Documents, incorporated herein by reference, for the details of his medical treatment.
A party's answers should be short and truthful. In most courts, and in Maryland, you must submit your responses to interrogatories within 30 days from the date they were delivered to a party or their attorney (25 days in federal court).
ANSWER NO. 4: Plaintiff is unaware of who arrived at the scene of the occurrence within the two hours of the happening of the occurrence other than those individuals listed in Plaintiff ’s Answer No. 3, and local government emergency personnel.
Plaintiff reserves the right to call an expert in the field of Theatre Safety Management, however, discovery is ongoing and this answer may be supplemented.
Stuart Mirvis, M.D., Stacy Smith, M.D., Clint Sliker, M.D., Lisa A. Miller, M.D., K. Shanmuganathan, M.D. and/or representatives of University Physicians at University of Maryland Medical Center, Shock Trauma, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, 800-492-5538, experts in the field of Diagnostic Imaging and Interpretation, are expected to testify as to the treatment rendered to Plaintiff following the accident, the fairness, reasonableness, necessity and causal relationship between the injuries sustained in the accident and their medical treatment rendered. His doctors are also expected to testify as to the permanent nature of the injuries sustained by Plaintiff as a result of this accident; future medical expenses and treatment which are reasonably expected to occur in the future. Additionally, his doctors are expected to testify that he suffered from a pre-existing condition and this pre-existing condition was exacerbated in the accident. His doctors are also expected to testify that this pre-existing condition made him more susceptible to injury. The doctors’ opinions are based upon their review of the medical records, treatment or examination of Plaintiff, history taken from Plaintiff and years of experience and medical training. Plaintiff incorporates all of his medical records as though fully set forth herein.
There are deadlines for responding to interrogatories. Depending on where you live, you may have 30 days to respond. Do not delay in submitting your responses. A court can sanction you if you fail to respond to written discovery requests on time.
During the discovery process, both spouses have the opportunity to ask questions, request documents, and conduct depositions to obtain evidence in support of their claims. Interrogatories are written questions submitted by one spouse to the other.
A missed response to an interrogatory can end up costing you. Specifically, in some circumstances, your spouse can file a motion to compel your response to an interrogatory and seek attorney’s fees because you failed to respond initially. To protect yourself, you should submit an answer to each interrogatory or provide a valid objection, which identifies the reasons you can't answer.
You or your spouse will have to provide written answers to the other’s interrogatories. Below are some tips for preparing interrogatory responses, which can impact the rest of your divorce. You should answer each interrogatory honestly, even if it involves an uncomfortable topic.
You should answer each interrogatory honestly, even if it involves an uncomfortable topic. For example, you should respond truthfully to an interrogatory asking about your hospitalizations for depression. If you lie in your response to an interrogatory, your fib could come back to haunt you during a deposition or when testifying at trial.
plaintiff’s employment records from previous employers allow an employer to obtain similar complaints the employee has made or filed against other employers, dates of employment and income for calculation of damages, and a pattern of the employee’s poor performance or misconduct.
An employer’s request for personal diaries and journals is to obtain evidence (or the lack thereof) of emotional distress and/or physical damages and any reference or description of the allegations in the complaint. Diaries and journals can exist in hard-copy books, electronic formats (on computers, tablets, smartphone, etc.), or audio/video recordings.
If you believe the plaintiff has destroyed or altered discoverable ESI or other information (i.e., has committed spoliation), move for sanctions. Courts can sanction plaintiffs by fining them, holding them in contempt, striking or dismissing pleadings or claims, or prohibiting the introduction of certain evidence.
The 2015 Amendments to the FRCP changed the scope of discovery available in employment discrimination cases. The amendments to FRCP 26(b)(1) deleted the former provision for the discovery of relevant but inadmissible information because some used the phrase “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence” incorrectly, to define the scope of discovery.
Lexis Practice Advisor® offers beginning-to-end practical guidance to support attorneys’ work in specific legal practice areas. Grounded in the real-world experience of expert practitioner-authors, our guidance ranges from practice notes and legal analysis to checklists and annotated forms. In addition, Lexis Practice Advisor provides everything you need to advise clients and draft your work product in 16 different practice areas.