The Attorney General’s experts determined that younger children who played on the turf were exposed to lead in excess of the Proposition 65 warning level from hand-to-mouth contact. As a result of the Attorney General’s suit, the main manufacturers of artificial turf (AstroTurf, Field Turf, and Beaulieu) agreed to reduce the lead content to 50 ppm or lower.
Oct 29, 2015 · Frustration of the legislative intent of Prop 65 and abuse of those doing business in the State arise because actions may also be brought “by a person in the public interest” if the private action is commenced more than 60 days from the date that the person has given notice of an alleged violation and neither the Attorney General, District Attorney, City Attorney or …
These are letters the Office of the Attorney General has sent on Proposition 65 issues that have arisen over the years. In addition, AB 1583, which takes effect January 1, 2018, requires the Attorney General's Office to send a letter to the noticing party and alleged violator if, after reviewing the factual information attached to the Attorney General's copy of a certificate
Jul 31, 2019 · J&J Prop 65 Lawsuit Dismissed, Setting Stage for Future Fight. [:en] A California judge is dismissing a case brought by plaintiffs against Johnson & Johnson over their talc products. The claim is that Johnson & Johnson talc products should be labeled as carcinogenic according to the state’s Prop 65 rule. Read on to find out why dismissing the ...
The California Attorney General's Office enforces Proposition 65. Any district attorney or city attorney (for cities whose population exceeds 750,000) may also enforce Proposition 65.
A furniture product with a Proposition 65 warning suggests the product can expose you to levels of a listed chemical or chemicals that pose greater health risks than furniture that causes exposures to lower levels of listed chemicals.
This warning is often in the form of a label on the product or its packaging. The law defines “no significant risk” as a level of exposure that would cause no more than 1 extra case of cancer in 100,000 people over a 70-year lifetime.Jun 26, 2019
They indicate that the warning refers to the inner components of the appliances. Is this your understanding with home appliances? This Prop 65 Warning appears to be on most if not all home appliances (Range, Dishwasher, Microwave, Refrigerator, Washer and Dryer).Mar 29, 2020
It remains politically controversial even after more than 30 years (see Controversy and claimed abuse below), in large part because business objects to Proposition 65's burden of proof , which in effect requires businesses to know the scientific safety level for specific cancer- and birth defect-causing chemicals that ...
Prop 65 is about chemicals, which always have the potential to impact electronics. It requires any company doing business in California to warn consumers about significant exposure to chemicals that the state has linked to cancer, birth defects or reproductive harm.Sep 25, 2018
In addition to the general warnings for chemical exposures from consumer products, the new regulation provides specific warnings for exposures from: Alcoholic beverages, food, prescription drugs, dental care, wood dust, furniture products, diesel engines, vehicles, and recreational vessels.
Proposition 65 requires the State to publish a list of chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. This list, which must be updated at least once a year, has grown to include over 800 chemicals since it was first published in 1987.Aug 1, 2017
ProductsAlcoholic Beverages.Cannabis and THC Products.Diesel Engine Exhaust.Food.Furniture Products.Passenger and Off-Highway Motor Vehicles.Petroleum Products.Recreational Vessels.More items...
Why am I being warned about potential exposure to chemicals from household appliances? Some household appliances may contain chemicals that are on the Proposition 65 list because they can cause cancer and/or birth defects or other reproductive harm.
All manufacturers must still make a Prop 65 warning statement on their products even though there is very low significant risk of cancer, or is significantly below levels observed to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm. Products are banned if they contain toxic chemicals in harmful amounts.Jul 10, 2020
Prop 65 in California is mostly about awareness of chemicals in products. It basically means that the item contains some possibly toxic chemicals but not at unsafe levels. Some plastics can release cancer-causing agents (like BPA) when exposed to very high heat, like inside a dishwasher, for example.
The lawsuits also claim that Johnson & Johnson was aware that their talc was not safe, but hid the knowledge from the public anyway.
The claim is that Johnson & Johnson talc products should be labeled as carcinogenic according to the state’s Prop 65 rule. Read on to find out why dismissing the case actually works in the plaintiff’s favor.
Avoid Prop 65 Lawsuits By Posting the Proper Notice#N#The best way to avoid a Prop 65 lawsuit is by posting the warning signs called for in that statutory scheme. If warning signs are placed before the Prop 65 60-day violation notice is sent by the plaintiff or its attorney, an action can be defended on that basis.
Attack the Plaintiff's Prop 65 Violation Notice#N#In order to obtain standing to pursue a Prop 65 lawsuit, the plaintiff is required to give a 60-day notice that includes the very precise language set forth in this statute, and the interpreting regulations.#N#Because many courts tend to disfavor Prop 65 lawsuits brought by bounty hunter attorneys, they carefully scrutinize the notices, and look for any possible defect.#N#The notice required by Prop.
Fight Back By Seeking Sactions Against the Plaintiff and Its Counsel#N#When a defendant prevails in a lawsuit, the court typically awards costs of suit that can include court fees, reporter's fees, deposition transcripts, photocopies, and costs for serving process.#N#In California, if a plaintiff brings an action it knows to be without merit, the plaintiff and its attorney can be required to pay monetary sanctions in addition to these costs.#N#If an attorney were to bring a Prop 65 lawsuit in which the required Prop 65 notice had been posted by the business, or based on a deficient Prop 65 violation notice, the court could find the lawsuit to be frivolous, and sanction the plaintiff and his attorney..
Conclusion#N#Litigation is never fun, is usually expensive, and should be avoided if at all possible.
In reality, Prop. 65 turns ordinary regulation on its head, by setting extremely wide margins of safety. It then forces businesses to prove – in lawsuits brought by private individuals and groups who get to keep part of the penalties and all of their attorney’s fees – that the claimed exposures do not exceed those standards.
The complexity of Prop. 65 was compounded in May, 2008, when the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced that it had the authority to automatically add chemicals to the Prop. 65 list under Labor Code Section 6382 (d) (Labor Code Mechanism). Under its erroneous interpretation of Prop.
This was not what Bay Area environmental attorney David Roe had in mind when he drafted Proposition 65 as a market-driven alternative to government mandates that would persuade companies to clean up to avoid having to “fess up.”
Political strategists in 1986 hoped Proposition 65 would draw liberal-leaning voters to the polls and help Democratic L.A. Mayor Tom Bradley, left, unseat Republican Gov. George Deukmejian. Californians ended up backing the proposition but not Bradley. (Rick Meyer / Los Angeles Times)
Right-wing talk show host Alex Jones, whose Infowars Life dietary supplements were tagged with a $135,000 settlement in 2018 over lead content, warns only Californians on its website, but warns everyone on Amazon, which holds its independent sellers responsible for Proposition 65 compliance.