If she has a Court Order requiring you to pay her attorney's fees, then yes, you are required to pay her attorney's fees because it is in the Order. If an Order has been issued that does not include attorney's fees (or leave the issue open for later determination), then I don't see how she can obtain attorney's fees.
Full Answer
If you don’t have the funds to pay, your attorney will likely recommend bankruptcy. Attorneys’ fees are generally dischargeable, meaning you can wipe them out. If your income is low, you will probably qualify for a quick Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Otherwise, you’ll likely pay the fees off over five years in a Chapter 13 case.
In the United States, the general rule (called the American Rule) is that each party pays only their own attorney's fees, regardless of whether they win or lose. This allows people to bring cases and lawsuits without the fear of incurring excessive costs if they lose the case.
Contractual Attorneys' Fees Provisions It's common for attorneys' fees to be awarded when the contract at issue requires the losing side to pay the winning side's legal fees and costs. This usually occurs in a business context where the parties have specifically included an attorney fee requirement in a contract.
The legal fees add up and it is not uncommon for individuals to question how they can afford to continue paying their legal fees even though they need representation to protect their legal interests. One solution is filing a motion to have the other spouse/parent pay his/her attorney’s fees and costs.
No law in California or any other state requires one partner to pay the other's attorney fees. California judges will – in very rare cases – issue an order to one spouse to pay the other's attorney fees, but only – in most cases – if a family's finances are so one-sided that the divorce process would otherwise be ...
Five things not to say to a lawyer (if you want them to take you..."The Judge is biased against me" Is it possible that the Judge is "biased" against you? ... "Everyone is out to get me" ... "It's the principle that counts" ... "I don't have the money to pay you" ... Waiting until after the fact.
The American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct states that a lawyer “shall not knowingly make a false statement of material fact.” In other words, lawyers aren't supposed to lie--and they can be disciplined or even disbarred for doing so.
The attorney-client privilege is a rule that protects the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and clients. Under the rule, attorneys may not divulge their clients' secrets, nor may others force them to.
One type of attorney fee statute that's common in many states allows a judge to require attorneys' fees to be paid to the winning party in a lawsuit that benefited the public or was brought to enforce a right that significantly affected the public interest. Another common state law allows for attorneys' fees to be paid by ...
It's common for attorneys' fees to be awarded when the contract at issue requires the losing side to pay the winning side's legal fees and costs. This usually occurs in a business context where the parties have specifically included an attorney fee requirement in a contract.
This type of equitable remedy—granting attorneys' fees to the winning side—is often used when the losing side brought a lawsuit that was frivolous, in bad faith, or to oppress the defendant, and the defendant wins. Also, once in a while, a judge will grant attorneys' fees in cases of extreme attorney misconduct, to warn the offending attorney.
Attorneys' fees are generally dischargeable, meaning you can wipe them out. If your income is low, you will probably qualify for a quick Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Otherwise, you'll likely pay the fees off over five years in a Chapter 13 case.
And a Wisconsin law calls for the losing side to pay attorneys' fees ...
A state court judge can also impose an "additur" increasing the amount of a jury award, which, in effect, can have the same result, but again, it's rare. You shouldn't count on receiving additional funds through either of these mechanisms.
The winning side usually has to pay its own attorney's fees. Ensuring that people can bring cases and lawsuits without the fear of incurring excessive costs if they lose the case is important. To further this goal, the losing side doesn't usually pay the winning side's attorney's fees. In the United States, the rule (called the American Rule) ...
An award of attorney’s fees and costs may be granted based on (1) the relative circumstances of the parties; and/or (2) the conduct of the parties’ and/or their attorney that frustrates potential settlement, including any bad faith actions.
Therefore, if one spouse/parent makes a significant amount more than the other party, an attorney’s fee award may be properly made. However, it is important to note that this is only where the disparity in income in significant.
The Code goes on to state that “In order to obtain an award under this section, the party requesting an award of attorney's fees and costs is not required to demonstrate any financial need for the award.”.
The court does not take a motion for attorney’s fees lightly, and as such, a justifiable need for the other party to contribute to one’s fees and costs must be adequately demonstrated. However, financial need is not the only way to seek assistance from the other party with one’s fees.
The courts are directed to consider other factors when making an order regarding attorney fees, such as the conduct of each party and how that conduct promotes or frustrates the policy of law to promote settling cases, though these considerations point toward fee orders that are more like sanctions than need based fees.
The California Family Code provides that in a family law case, the court can order one party to pay a contribution to the attorney fees incurred by the other party … where the making of the award, and the amount of the award, are just and reasonable under the relative circumstances of the respective parties. Essentially, the court can order the spouse in a superior financial position to pay a contribution toward the attorney fees of the other spouse. In considering the relative circumstances of the parties the court considers their respective incomes and expenses, as well as their cash available to pay counsel. For example, in a family law case where the husband earns $10,000 each month, and the wife earns $1,300 each month, the court could find that based on the relative circumstances of the parties, particularly the great disparity in the parties incomes, it would be just and reasonable to order husband to pay a contribution to wife’s attorney fees so wife is able to afford an attorney to represent her in the case. The court does this to achieve parity or a level playing field so that both parties have equal access to justice.
The court does this to achieve parity or a level playing field so that both parties have equal access to justice. This rule of leveling the playing field for parties to a divorce has at times resulted in the higher earning spouse being ordered to pay a contribution to the opposing attorney, leaving that spouse with little or no funds ...
The Appellate Court goes on to warn that however, by providing for orders to pay money so that one’s adversary can afford an attorney, there is the paradoxical possibility that a court may effectively deprive the paying party of the ability to present his or her own case.
Essentially, the court can order the spouse in a superior financial position to pay a contribution toward the attorney fees of the other spouse. In considering the relative circumstances of the parties the court considers their respective incomes and expenses, as well as their cash available to pay counsel.
Failure to collect a large legal fee can endanger the lawyer’s standing in his firm and within the larger legal or client community. Fee collection claims often lead to ethical complaints, and counterclaims for malpractice, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or breach of contract.
Where money has been advanced in anticipation of future services, the lawyer is usually required to keep the money in a client trust account. The trust account money is considered property of the client in most jurisdictions. The lawyer has a right to withdraw the money after the fees are “earned” by the lawyer.
Lawyers will often refer to agreements they have with clients, typically drafted by the lawyer at the beginning of the engagement, as evidence that a client agreed to certain payment terms. For example, there may be agreement as to hourly rates, staffing, or contemplated courses of action.
Despite this, lawyers often tell their clients they are entitled to a “bonus” over the agreed-upon fee because the matter has become more difficult than expected or because of an unexpectedly favorable result. It is common for such a lawyer to “negotiate” the increased fee in the middle of an engagement.
If your lawyer is unwilling to discuss the bills, you should put your concerns in writing, and consider ending the relationship.
If the ethical transgression is slight or not related to the fees charged to the client, courts are less likely to order a forfeiture of fees. Where the transgression is serious and has a closer nexus to the fees, partial or total forfeiture is likely.
If the representation is over, you may feel compelled to pay outstanding bills, even if they are outrageous, since your lawyer is the last person you want as an adversary in litigation. You recognize that your lawyer possesses superior knowledge about the legal system that will determine any billing dispute.
Retainer fees act as a down payment on attorney services. If an attorney accepts a case on an hourly basis with no retainer fee, he or she will bill the client as work is completed. However, there is no guarantee that the attorney will actually receive the funds due to him or her for the work completed. A retainer fee provides an assurance to lawyers that they will be paid. Some retainer fees state that they are non-refundable, giving a further guarantee of payment to attorneys.
This means that the attorney will not receive his or her legal fees unless you win or settle your case. Additionally, some attorneys are willing to bill clients at a certain rate up to a maximum amount. This way, you will only be required to pay a certain amount even if the attorney spends additional time on your case.
As a matter of internal policy, a lawyer may request a retainer fee before agreeing to accept your case or complete any work on it. However, you do not have to pay such a fee if you are not comfortable with the idea.
To request fees during a divorce, one spouse must file a Request for Order with the court. The Court will schedule a court hearing for you and your spouse to ‘argue’ your respective positions and then the judge will make a decision.
Some examples of when fees as “sanctions” may be appropriate income (but are not limited to): 1. Withholding important information about your child’s health or welfare from the other spouse; 2.
The issues that need to be resolved in your divorce are property & debt, child custody, child support and spousal support. Additionally, attorney fees need to be considered and resolved in a way that makes sense for you and your spouse. The Family Code allows the court to award fees in the amount that are “reasonably necessary” to properly litigate ...
The Family Code allows the court to award fees in the amount that are “reasonably necessary” to properly litigate and/or negotiate a divorce. “Need based” fees can be requested at any point during your divorce.
Requesting fees is not easy. The forms are quite procedural and require you to do a lot of work to show there is a disparity in access to funds and you need legal help. That being said, if the court finds that these factors are met, the judge must order that fees be paid.
Since California is a ‘no fault’ divorce state, fees are not awarded for ‘bad’ behavior outside the context ...
If it was part of the original court order, or in any subsequent order to make sure you paid, then yes, you will have to pay. Talk with your attorney to see what the orders said.
What does the Order say? If she has a Court Order requiring you to pay her attorney's fees, then yes, you are required to pay her attorney's fees because it is in the Order. If an Order has been issued that does not include attorney's fees (or leave the issue open for later determination), then I don't see how she can obtain attorney's fees. If the case is still open, she could request the Court to order you to pay her attorney's fees. Since the issue surrounds past due child support, a Judge could ultimately award her attorney's fees, but the Court would take into consideration your current financial circumstances.
A judge could order you to pay for her fees depending on how much she makes. If you owed support, there may be an automatic right to get attorney fees from you for collection.
If you and your wife cannot reach a settlement, which will usually waive claims for attorney fees, and the case goes to a full trial, then she can ask for attorney fees. However, attorney fees are in most cases only awarded to the "less monied spouse", meaning that if your wife makes about the same or more than you do, then it is likely that her request for attorney fees will be denied.
Attorney's fees for the divorce are a community obligation-just as joint bills you may have run up while you were married. If you were represented during the divorce, your attorney's fees are chargeable to the community as well, so the two charges would offset one another, normally.