Answer (1 of 9): Mueller did not leave the decision to the Attorney General, he is referring the question to Congress. A Special Counsel was appointed in this matter to insulate any determination from political influence from the president. Robert Mueller is well aware that his role was to finis...
Furthermore 28 CFR 600.9(c) give the AG wide discretionary powers as what to disclose to the public from all that (c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release …
Oct 13, 2021 · Chicago Attorney Seeks Secret Mueller Report Materials. Just when you thought you had heard everything about Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian efforts to influence the ...
In a 400-page report sent to ... Despite Mueller’s decision, Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein ... it also can’t give him the opportunity for a speedy ...
Apr 18, 2019 · Instead, Mueller was using his report to gather evidence of Trump’s actions and crimes and submit it to Congress, so that lawmakers could make a decision on how to handle Trump’s misdeeds. . @AriMelber explains five facts we have learned from the Mueller Report.
U.S. President Donald Trump talks to reporters as he leaves the White House April 05, 2019 in Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images. Because Mueller’s team can’t indict Trump, it also can’t give him the opportunity for a speedy trial to clear his name, Mueller reasoned.
All that said, Mueller also said that he did not rule out publicly clearing the President of wrongdoing, either. But based on the facts his investigators uncovered, he decided not to do so.
Despite Mueller’s decision, Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced in late March that after reviewing the evidence they had decided that Trump did not obstruct justice. Here’s a look at the legal reasoning behind Mueller’s decision.
A sitting president cannot be indicted. Mueller began by noting that the Office of Legal Counsel in the White House wrote in a 2000 memo that sitting presidents can’t be indicted because it would undermine their ability to oversee the nation’s criminal justice system.
Mueller then notes that defendants have a constitutional right to clear their name of criminal accusations through a speedy trial. By contrast, if prosecutors were allowed to impugn their reputations without charging them with crimes, it would be unfair.
S pecial Counsel Robert Mueller found significant evidence that Donald Trump may have obstructed justice, but he declined to charge him based on his view of how the law should work. In a 400-page report sent to Congress Thursday, the former FBI director spelled out a view of the constitutional limitations placed on ...