Jul 17, 2021 · It had also come to light that Zach's former defense attorney had neglected to tell the Witman family about a possible plea offer he could have taken before the murder case first went to trial, according to People. As a result, Zach's conviction and sentencing were thrown out, and he became eligible for resentencing in 2018.
Mar 31, 2013 · Attorney David McGlaughlin, who represented Zachary Witman at trial, says it's about time that a new, private investigation be done in the murder of 13-year-old Gregory Witman.
Dec 01, 2020 · Subsequently, Zach's new attorney discovered that a prior defense attorney had failed to tell Zach about a plea offer made by prosecutors before the first trial began. The revelation led a judge ...
Nov 04, 2015 · The Witmans hired the attorney Cristina Gutierrez ( the same defense lawyer for Adnan Syed, whose story was the focus of Serial ). Five years later, after many appeals and botched trials, the ...
Zachary Witman was originally convicted as an adult in 2003 and sentenced to life without parole in the brutal murder of his 13-year-old brother. However, after his conviction and sentencing were tossed out by a judge Feb.
Zachary was 15 in 1998 when he slashed and cut Gregory Witman more than 100 times -- 65 times to the neck -- nearly decapitating him with a penknife.
Police, finding no other suspects, arrested Zachary and charged him with murder eight days later.
Because of a number of pretrial motions, most concerning the admissibility of evidence, Zachary's trial was delayed 4 ½ years. By then, Zachary was 20.
Numerous unsuccessful defense appeals followed the conviction. In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Zachary's appeal.
Zachary and his parents, Ron and Sue Witman, who still live in the New Freedom home where Greg was killed, have maintained that Zachary had no reason or motive to murder Greg. However, on Feb. 8, 2018, Zachary admitted guilt in his plea to third-degree murder. He will be eligible for parole as early as January 2019.
Here are some selected stories in chronological order from the Daily Record archives about the Witman case:
As Koenig discussed in Thursdays episode, the Whitmans were among the former clients who ultimately sued Gutierrez for misplaced funds. Ron and Sue Whitman hired Gutierrez to defend their son in 2000, in a horrifically tragic case; their older of their two boys, Zach, was charged with killing his 13-year-old brother Greg, by stabbing him 65 times in the neck with a pen knife. Halfway through the trial, Ron and Sue fired Cristina. In 2003, Whitman was convicted to life in prison. The latest of his numerous appeals throughout the years took place in January of this year, which he lost.
Back in 1986, Gutierrez defended Sandra Craig, owner and operator a Clarksville pre-school, was charged with 53 counts of child abuse, molestation and child pornography. Her 16-year-old son Jamal, who worked at the school, was charged with 8 counts of molestation, including the rape of a 6-year-old girl, according to the National Registry ...
The hysteria she's referring to is the case of Walter Price, a 49-year-old Social Studies teacher who was convicted of sexually abusing a student at the very same school just a few months earlier. Cook was ultimately acquitted, but subsequently lost her job in 1995.
In 1993, Gutierrez represented Laurie Susanne Cook, Anne Arundel, Maryland school teacher who was accused of sexually abusing a 14-year-old male student. Cook was 33 at the time. "We're vehemently denying the charges," Gutierrez told the Baltimore Sun. "It's not unusual... in the context of the hysteria at Northeast, to have created an accusation out of nothing." The hysteria she's referring to is the case of Walter Price, a 49-year-old Social Studies teacher who was convicted of sexually abusing a student at the very same school just a few months earlier. Cook was ultimately acquitted, but subsequently lost her job in 1995.
According to forensic scientist Deborah Calhoun, the bloodstain pattern in Zachary’s sweatshirt means that he was in close proximity of Gregory when the wounds were inflicted, and that the victim was alive at this point (Zachary’s defense claims he got the blood on him when he rolled over Gregory’s body, as instructed by the 911 operator). You can see a picture of the sweatshirt above. She also testified that in her opinion, the blood spots on Zachary’s socks meant that Gregory was standing when they fell on him. Her expertise was questioned by the defense.
The Phone Call. The friend of Gregory who called was Eryn Jeffery. She knew that Gregory usually arrived home at around 3:07, and she initially called at 3:09. She says someone picked up the phone downstairs (she could tell because it was a flip phone and it made a distinctive sound) and hung up quickly.
The main problem with the case against Zachary is the lack of motive. His parents say the brothers had a close relationship and, as far as I know, no one testified something different on the trial (Of course, we know that parents not always know what’s really going on with their kids).
We FIGHT To Get Results. Over 40 years of experience defending those accused of serious state and federal charges.
Top Attorney, Experienced, Aggressive, Effective State and Federal Criminal Defense. Available 24/7, Call Today For Help.
Top-Rated LOCAL Criminal Defense. 150+ Yrs Combined Experience. A+ BBB, Super Lawyers™, Superb 10 AVVO, Top 100 Trial Lawyers.
Focusing solely on Federal and State criminal charges, including white collar crimes, drug charges & other serious allegations.
Connect with a local Tampa, FL attorney with proven experience helping clients with Florida criminal defense issues.
Wes E. Trombley is experienced handling Florida criminal defense cases in the Tampa area.
Experienced, assertive criminal defense representation in the Tampa, FL area.
RHINO Lawyers’ Criminal Division defends those accused of breaking the law. As a former Prosecutor, we will leverage our inside knowledge to achieve the absolute best results for you.
I highly recommend Zach Armocida services. He represented me in a highly professional manner regarding a traffic case with potentially serious consequences, and he was able to persuade the Court to reduce my charges. He represented me and I did not have to appear in Court.
I hired Zachary to defend me in traffic court for an unwinnable case. He found the right evidence to have the judge dismiss the charges