Trial of teacher John Scopes of Dayton, Tennessee, for the teaching of evolution. During this trial, attorneys Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan squared off on the teachings of Darwin versus the teachings of the Bible. Click again to see term 👆. Tap again to see term 👆. Nice work!
Who was John Scopes? ... He was the defense attorney for Scopes. Who was William Jennings Bryan? He was the prosecuter and he argued for creation science. ... Quizlet Live. Quizlet Learn. Diagrams. Flashcards. Mobile. Help. Sign up. Help Center. Honor Code. Community Guidelines. Students. Teachers.
What did John T Scopes do to get arrested? ... Who was the prosecutor for the trial? William Jennings Bryan. Who was the defense attorney for the trial? Clarence Darron. What is one of the nicknames the trial was given? could be one of three: "Civilization is on trial" ... Quizlet Live. Quizlet Learn. Diagrams. Flashcards. Mobile. Help. Sign up ...
Trial of teacher John Scopes of Dayton, Tennessee, for the teaching of evolution. During this trial, attorneys Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan squared off on the teachings of Darwin versus the teachings of the Bible. William Jennings Bryan. Three-time Democratic nominee for president; Bryan was also the prosecutor in the Scopes Trial. Clarence Darrow.
Three-time Democratic nominee for president; Bryan was also the prosecutor in the Scopes Trial.
Judge Raulsten removed this from the record because he said it was irrelevant.
He tried to prove that mant of the things in the Bible that are considered miracles are unreasonable . Bryan said that not everything in the Bible should be taken literally.
Trial of teacher John Scopes of Dayton, Tennessee, for the teaching of evolution. During this trial, attorneys Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan squared off on the teachings of Darwin versus the teachings of the Bible.
Butlers law- Tennesse law that made it illegal to teach evolution in state funded schools.
The setting of the Scopes Trial, it was planned as a publicity stunt so people would come to the city.
1925 Supreme Court case in which Clarence Darrow was the defense attorney. It maintained the freedom of speech and the press are among the fundamental liberties given by the 1st amendment that are to be protected by due process from impairment by the states by the 14th amendment. However, limitations of this exposed: Gitlow, a socialist, was still convicted.
Lawmakers justified this proposal based upon academic freedom. However, it was denied because it lacks a clear secular purpose. It violates the establishment clause of the first amendment because it implies the establishment of a state religion.
Tennessee statue that makes it unlawful for a public-school teacher to teach any doctrine that conflicts with the Divine Creation of Man. Tested in the Scopes Trial. Remains on Tennessee books for 40 years.
Also called the Johnson-Reed Act. Restricts immigration quotas to 2% of US foreign born population from the country as recorded in 1890 census. Banned Asian immigration entirely. Reflects racist attitudes of the decade.
Preliminary jury selection. Prospective jurors (venire men) can be excluded by peremptory challenges (Tennessee only 3) or challenges for a cause (if the judge accepts)
Though decades after the Scopes case, shows how it is a still a relevant argument. 2005 Supreme Court case in PA in which teaching intelligent design in public schools was declared unconstitutional. Biology teachers were supposed to read a statement saying evolution & intelligent design were both views people have. But, court decided intelligent design a religious view of creationism and is not scientific.
John Scopes. What became known as the Scopes Monkey Trial began as a publicity stunt for the town of Dayton, Tennessee. A local businessman met with the school superintendent and a lawyer to discuss using the ACLU offer to get newspapers to write about the town.
The trial was viewed as an opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of the bill, to publicly advocate for the legitimacy of Darwin’s theory of evolution, and to enhance the profile of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
Bryan arrived in Dayton three days before the trial, stepping off a train to the spectacle of half the town greeting him. He posed for photo opportunities and gave two public speeches, stating his intention to not only defend the anti-evolution law but to use the trial to debunk evolution entirely. Recommended for you.
The trial day started with crowds pouring into the courthouse two hours before it was scheduled to begin , filling up the room and causing onlookers to spill into the hallways. There was applause when Bryan entered the court and further when he and Darrow shook hands.
When the judge ruled Bryan’s testimony be taken from the record, Darrow suggested that to save time his client should be found guilty. This prevented Bryan from making a closing statement.
A preliminary hearing on May 9, 1925, officially held Scopes for trial by the grand jury, though released him and didn’t require him to post bond.
Concerted anti-evolutionist efforts in Tennessee succeeded when in 1925 , the Tennessee House of Representatives was offered a bill by John W. Butler making teaching evolution a misdemeanor. The so-called Butler Act was passed six days later almost unanimously with no amendments.
In response, the American Civil Liberties Union financed a test case in which John Scopes, a Tennessee high school science teacher, agreed to be tried for violating the Act. Scopes, who had substituted for the regular biology teacher, was charged on May 5, 1925, with teaching evolution from a chapter in George William Hunter 's textbook, Civic Biology: Presented in Problems (1914), which described the theory of evolution, race, and eugenics. The two sides brought in the biggest legal names in the nation, William Jennings Bryan for the prosecution and Clarence Darrow for the defense, and the trial was followed on radio transmissions throughout the United States.
John Thomas Scopes and commonly referred to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was an American legal case in July 1925 in which a high school teacher, John T. Scopes, was accused of violating Tennessee 's Butler Act, which had made it unlawful to teach human evolution in ...
His teachings, and His teachings alone, can solve the problems that vex the heart and perplex the world. After eight days of trial, it took the jury only nine minutes to deliberate. Scopes was found guilty on July 21 and ordered by Raulston to pay a $100 fine (equivalent to $1,500 in 2020).
On the seventh day of the trial, Clarence Darrow took the unorthodox step of calling William Jennings Bryan, counsel for the prosecution, to the stand as a witness in an effort to demonstrate that belief in the historicity of the Bible and its many accounts of miracles was unreasonable. Bryan accepted, on the understanding that Darrow would in turn submit to questioning by Bryan. Although Hays would claim in his autobiography that the examination of Bryan was unplanned, Darrow spent the night before in preparation. The scientists the defense had brought to Dayton—and Charles Francis Potter, a modernist minister who had engaged in a series of public debates on evolution with the fundamentalist preacher John Roach Straton —prepared topics and questions for Darrow to address to Bryan on the witness stand. Kirtley Mather, chairman of the geology department at Harvard and also a devout Baptist, played Bryan and answered questions as he believed Bryan would. Raulston had adjourned court to the stand on the courthouse lawn, ostensibly because he was "afraid of the building" with so many spectators crammed into the courtroom, but probably because of the stifling heat.
The confrontation between Bryan and Darrow lasted approximately two hours on the afternoon of the seventh day of the trial. It is likely that it would have continued the following morning but for Judge Raulston's announcement that he considered the whole examination irrelevant to the case and his decision that it should be "expunged" from the record. Thus Bryan was denied the chance to cross-examine the defense lawyers in return, although after the trial Bryan would distribute nine questions to the press to bring out Darrow's "religious attitude". The questions and Darrow's short answers were published in newspapers the day after the trial ended, with The New York Times characterizing Darrow as answering Bryan's questions "with his agnostic's creed, 'I don't know,' except where he could deny them with his belief in natural, immutable law".
Scopes was found guilty and fined $100 (equivalent to $1,500 in 2020), but the verdict was overturned on a technicality. The trial served its purpose of drawing intense national publicity, as national reporters flocked to Dayton to cover the big-name lawyers who had agreed to represent each side.
The ACLU had originally intended to oppose the Butler Act on the grounds that it violated the teacher's individual rights and academic freedom , and was therefore unconstitutional. Principally because of Clarence Darrow, this strategy changed as the trial progressed. The earliest argument proposed by the defense once the trial had begun was that there was actually no conflict between evolution and the creation account in the Bible; later, this viewpoint would be called theistic evolution. In support of this claim, they brought in eight experts on evolution. But other than Dr. Maynard Metcalf, a zoologist from Johns Hopkins University, the judge would not allow these experts to testify in person. Instead, they were allowed to submit written statements so their evidence could be used at the appeal. In response to this decision, Darrow made a sarcastic comment to Judge Raulston (as he often did throughout the trial) on how he had been agreeable only on the prosecution's suggestions. Darrow apologized the next day, keeping himself from being found in contempt of court.