Jul 25, 2018 · Attorney Eric Multhaup argued that Turner was engaged in "sexual outercourse" and did not demonstrate that he intended to rape the victim, according to NBC Bay Area.
Jul 25, 2018 · Brock Turner's lawyer Eric Multhaup made the novel argument Tuesday in a state appellate court in San Jose, California, which appeared only to confuse the three-judge panel.
Jul 26, 2018 · His attorney, Erick Multhaup, said, "The record lacks sufficient evidence to support the three convictions in this case." >> Related: What led to Brock Turner’s assault case?
Jul 24, 2018 · A lawyer for Brock Turner told a California Court of Appeals panel that Brock never intended to rape the half-naked, unconscious woman he was found on top of outside a fraternity party in January ...
The California judge who was recalled after handing down a sentence seen as too lenient for Stanford swimmer Brock Turner after his conviction for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman and who worked briefly as a Bay Area high school coach has been fired from that job, the district announced Wednesday.Sep 12, 2019
In his ruling, Persky claimed that a prison sentence would “have a severe effect” on the 19-year-old Turner and that, regardless of the sentence, he would be required to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.Jun 6, 2018
For four years, the woman whose Stanford University sexual assault case caused a public outcry, has been known only as “Emily Doe.” In her new memoir, “Know My Name,” which charts her life since then, she reveals her real name: Chanel Miller.Sep 24, 2019
On June 2, 2016, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky sentenced Turner to six months in jail followed by three years of probation....People v. TurnerFull case nameThe People of the State of California v. Brock Allen Turner13 more rows
Persky is an Ashkenazi Jewish toponymic surname after the village of Pershai in today's Valozhyn Raion, Belarus. Variants include Perski and Perske.
0:233:25Chanel Miller talks to "60 Minutes" about Brock Turner assault - YouTubeYouTubeStart of suggested clipEnd of suggested clipAnd that's the low end of state guidelines. Well last night on 60 minutes Miller told Bill WhitakerMoreAnd that's the low end of state guidelines. Well last night on 60 minutes Miller told Bill Whitaker how she's turning the trauma. Into a message of resilience. And she read from her powerful victim
In 2020, Turner is working an entry-level job at Tark Inc., a firm that manufactures cooling technology for medical appliances, earning $12 an hour. It is also reported that the now 24-year-old still lives at home with his parents in Bellbrook, Ohio, a suburb of Dayton, and drives a 2008 Chrysler Pacifica.Jun 3, 2020
Now living in New York, Miller is continuing to heal, helped along by her daily practice of doodling, and is finding joy in life as well as confronting fresh wounds.Mar 31, 2021
Alcohol Use and Abuse on College and University Campuses: A core issue associated with the Brock Turner case is the rampant use and abuse of alcohol on college and university campuses. According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, a college freshman’s first six weeks of college life, stand out as a time of harmful alcohol intake and its resultant undesirable effects and events. Studies show that approximately 50% of student sexual assaults involved alcohol. Of these, 46% of the victims had ingested alcohol, as did 69% of the perpetrators.
Miller, who was an intoxicated twenty-two (22) year old adult college graduate, and not a member of the Stanford community, met Brock Turner, a nineteen (19) year old Stanford freshman, in January 2015, at a Stanford Fraternity party, and the incident that occurred between them led to the prosecution and conviction of Turner for sexual assault, and a six (6) month jail sentence. Some media reports regarding the incident, criminal charges, trial, sentencing, and jail sentence have been distorted, inaccurate, malevolent, false, and untrue. On the eve of the release of Miller’s book, which will enable Miller to monetize the incident at Turner’s expense, and receive from a publisher what may possibly be a million dollars or more, the familiar admonition of an iconic crime detective television series, Lt. Joe Friday of Dragnet, is instructive: “Just the facts, ma’am”…This report provides facts in the Trial Record not disseminated (widely, or perhaps at all) by the mainstream media demonstrating that Turner was not guilty of criminal conduct in any of his interactions with Miller.
Stanford defines plagiarism as follows: “For purposes of the Stanford University Honor Code, plagiarism is defined as the use, without giving reasonable and appropriate credit to or acknowledging the author or source, of another person’s original work, whether such work is made up of code, formulas, ideas, language, research, strategies, ...
Turner is Sentenced: June 2, 2016. Judge Aaron Persky sentenced Brock Turner to six months in county jail and three years of probation. Persky says that this sentencing acknowledges the “devastation” of the victim and the “severe” impact prison would have on Turner.
Catherine Criswell, Stanford University’s Title IX Coordinator, also released a statement regarding Jonsson, Ardnt and other unnamed witnesses: “Several students, both graduates and undergraduates, were up standers in this situation…They made the courageous decision to intervene and provide assistance.
Kianerci called Alice King to the stand. She is the supervising criminalist for the Santa Clara County crime lab's toxicology unit and was called to testify to the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of both the victim and Turner. The blood of Emily Doe and Brock Turner was taken at the hospital hours after the assault.
Brock Turner was born August 1, 1995, in Dayton, Ohio. He graduated from Oakwood High School in 2014. At the time of his arrest, Turner was a 19-year-old freshman at Stanford University, enrolled on a swimming scholarship.
After the guilty verdict, Turner said to his probation officer that the encounter was consensual. He also gave an 11-page statement to the judge that said he received verbal consent from the woman before she passed out.
At the time of his conviction, it was reported that Turner's legal appeal would be led by attorney Dennis Riordan, who represented former baseball player Barry Bonds in a perjury case. Riordan was present in court Thursday, June 2 with Turner's initial attorney Michael Armstrong.
He wrote a letter to the judge expressing dissatisfaction with the sentencing length. The juror said that "the fact that Turner ran away after two Stanford graduate students noticed him on top of an unmoving woman" was compelling evidence, along with the incoherence of the message that Doe left her boyfriend before meeting Brock. The juror believed this was very strong evidence "that Turner should have reasonably known she was not able to give consent."
The second edition of the criminal justice textbook Introduction to Criminal Justice ( ISBN 9781506347721 ), by University of Colorado, Denver Professors Callie Marie Rennison and Mary Dodge, uses Turner 's mugshot as the accompanying photo in the entry that defines rape. According to the caption beneath Turner' s photo, which appears on Page 20 at the top of the section in the book on "rape":
Her sister (referred to by police as "Jane Doe 2") wrote a letter saying "an entire part of my heart has been permanently broken" by the assault, the lengthy prosecution, and Turner's failure to take responsibility for his actions .
In September 2019, Chanel Miller revealed herself as being "Emily Doe" in the case, released a book with the title Know My Name: A Memoir on September 4, 2019. She first began work on the book in 2017. The book was an attempt by Miller to reappropriate her narrative identity and describe the trauma she went through, after being referred to in the press as "unconscious intoxicated woman." The author discusses her experience of the assault and the trial, as well as how she has coped since then. Through research for the work, Miller perused court transcripts and testimony of individuals involved in the court proceedings—materials she had been unable to view throughout the trial of Brock Turner itself.