who was the attorney that represented bush in recount?

by Bryon Legros Published 3 years ago Updated 2 years ago 6 min read

Who was involved in the Bush-Gore recount?

Nov 06, 2020 · “I think the lawsuits filed so far are entirely without merit,” wrote Barry Richard, who served as a lead attorney for George W. Bush during the 2000 recount in Florida. The Trump team has brought...

Why did the Supreme Court stay the Bush recount?

Aug 17, 2020 · The mechanical recount reduced Bush’s margin to 327 votes. Gore had the right to request a hand recount in each of Floria’s 67 counties—the request had to be made county by county—but he ...

What did the court rule in Bush v Gore?

Nov 10, 2018 · The attorney who represented Former President George W. Bush said it quickly turned into a mess. “As a result of that, the Florida legislature made significant changes in the Florida statues to...

What role did John Roberts play in the Bush case?

Jan 06, 2006 · Gore filed his contest case after Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, a Republican, certified the state’s vote for Bush last Sunday. Harris’ attorney, Joseph Klock — fresh off his appearance before the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday — derided the Democrats’ case as a “voodoo presentation of experts” and an “election code omlette.”

Who represented Bush Bush v. Gore?

The oral argument in Bush v. Gore occurred on December 11. Theodore Olson, a Washington, D.C., lawyer, delivered Bush's oral argument. New York lawyer David Boies argued for Gore.

Who was Al Gore's lawyer?

"The Boies Family: Super-lawyer David Boies has been the go-to guy for legions of powerful people and institutions, including Al Gore, George Steinbrenner and CBS.

Who stopped the Florida recount?

The Florida vote was ultimately settled in Bush's favor by a margin of 537 votes when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Bush v. Gore, stopped a recount that had been initiated upon a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court.

Is Alan Dershowitz an attorney?

New York, New York, U.S. Alan Morton Dershowitz (/ˈdɜːrʃəwɪts/ DURR-shə-wits; born September 1, 1938) is an American lawyer known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law. From 1964 to 2013 he taught at Harvard Law School, where he was appointed the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law in 1993.

Who represents Theranos?

David BoiesDavid Boies, a prominent litigator, represented Theranos as its lawyer and served on its board.Aug 30, 2021

Was Bush a Republican?

Bush, a Republican from Texas, took office following a narrow victory over Democratic incumbent vice president Al Gore in the 2000 presidential election. Four years later, in the 2004 presidential election, he defeated Democrat nominee John Kerry to win re-election.

What did the Bush camp do to stop hand recounts?

Legal actions went forward on many fronts; the chair of the Miami-Dade canvassing board referred to the proliferation of suits as “ musical courts .” The Bush camp sought to stop hand recounts, and lost, on constitutional grounds, in federal court. The Gore camp sought, in state court, to prevent certification of the results until hand counts in four counties were complete—and momentarily prevailed, in the Florida Supreme Court. Separately, the Gore camp won a ruling by a Florida judge, Jorge Labarga, that so-called dimpled chads could be considered by officials conducting recounts.

How many votes did Bush have in Florida?

Two days later, on Sunday night, Katherine Harris certified the vote tally in Florida, and Bush’s lead stood at 537 votes.

Who won the 2000 Florida recount?

In the end, after start-and-stop recounts and the intervention of courts at every level, Texas Governor George W. Bush, the Republican candidate, was declared the victor, edging out Vice President Al Gore, the Democrat. The story of the 2000 Florida recount offers a reminder of just how chaotic the electoral process can become—and ...

Who is David Boies?

David Boies (Gore lawyer): The atmosphere was electric . You’d never had the United States Supreme Court as an institution intervene like this in a presidential election, and you had never had a case where the United States Supreme Court told a state how to count or not count ballots in a presidential election.

Why did Bush argue that recounts in Florida violated the Equal Protection Clause?

Bush argued that recounts in Florida violated the Equal Protection Clause because Florida did not have a statewide vote recount standard. Each county was on its own to determine whether a given ballot was an acceptable one. Two voters could have marked their ballots in an identical manner, but the ballot in one county would be counted while the ballot in a different county would be rejected, because of the conflicting manual recount standards.

How many articles were written about Bush v Gore?

Bush v. Gore prompted many strong reactions from scholars, pundits and others regarding the Court's decision, with a majority of publications in law reviews being critical. An analysis in The Georgetown Law Journal found that 78 scholarly articles were published about the case between 2001 and 2004, with 35 criticizing the decision and 11 defending it.

What was the Supreme Court decision in 2000?

98 (2000), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court on December 12, 2000, that settled a recount dispute in Florida's 2000 presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore. On December 8, the Florida Supreme Court had ordered a statewide recount of all undervotes, over 61,000 ballots that ...

When did the Florida recount stop?

On that date the Florida Supreme Court, by a 4–3 vote, ordered a statewide manual recount of undervotes. On December 9, ruling in response to an emergency request by Bush, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the recount.

What was the Equal Protection Clause violation?

Seven justices agreed that there was an Equal Protection Clause violation in using differing standards of determining a valid vote in different counties, causing an "unequal evaluation of ballots in various respects". The per curiam opinion (representing the views of Justices Kennedy, O'Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, and Thomas) specifically cited that:#N#Palm Beach County changed standards for counting dimpled chads several times during the counting process;#N#Broward County used less restrictive standards than Palm Beach County;#N#Miami-Dade County’s recount of rejected ballots did not include all precincts;#N#The Florida Supreme Court did not specify who would recount the ballots.

What was the Chief Justice's opinion in the Florida Supreme Court case?

Chief Justice Rehnquist's concurring opinion, joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas, began by emphasizing that this was an unusual case in which the Constitution requires federal courts to assess whether a state supreme court has properly interpreted the will of the state legislature. Usually, federal courts do not make that type of assessment, and indeed the per curiam opinion in this case did not do so. After addressing this aspect of the case, Rehnquist examined and agreed with arguments that had been made by the dissenting justices of the Florida Supreme Court.

What amendment is equal protection?

The Supreme Court, in a per curiam opinion, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's decision, calling for a statewide recount, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . This ruling was by a 7–2 vote, though per curiam opinions are usually issued only for unanimous votes.

Overview

Rapid developments

The oral argument in Bush v. Gore occurred on December 11. Theodore Olson, a Washington, D.C., lawyer, delivered Bush's oral argument. New York lawyer David Boies argued for Gore.
During the brief period when the U.S. Supreme Court was deliberating on Bush v. Gore, the Florida Supreme Court provided clarifications of its November 21 decision in Palm Beach County Canvassing Board v. Harris (Harris I), which the U.S. Supreme Court had requested on Decembe…

Background

In the United States, each state conducts its own popular vote election for president and vice president. The voters are actually voting for a slate of electors, each of whom pledges to vote for a particular candidate for each office, in the Electoral College. Article II, § 1, cl. 2of the U.S. Constitution provides that each state legislature decides how electors are chosen. Referrin…

Stay of the Florida recount

By December 8, 2000, there had been multiple court decisions regarding the presidential election in Florida. On that date the Florida Supreme Court, by a 4–3 vote, ordered a statewide manual recount of undervotes. On December 9, ruling in response to an emergency request by Bush, the U.S. Supreme Court stayedthe recount. The Court also decided to treat Bush's application for relief as a petiti…

Relevant law

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is the U.S. Constitutional provision on which the decision in Bush v. Gore was based.
Article II, § 1, cl. 2 of the Constitution specifies the number of electors per state, and, most relevant to this case, specifies the manner in which those electors are selected, stipulating that:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Elec…

Issues considered by the Court

The Court had to resolve two different questions to fully resolve the case:
• Were the recounts, as they were being conducted, constitutional?
• If the recounts were unconstitutional, what is the remedy?
Three days earlier, the five-Justice majority had ordered the recount stopped, a…

Decision

In brief, the breakdown of the decision was:
• Seven justices agreed that there was an Equal Protection Clause violation in using differing standards of determining a valid vote in different counties, causing an "unequal evaluation of ballots in various respects". The per curiam opinion (representing the views of Justices Kennedy, O'Connor, Rehnquist, Scalia, and Thomas) specifically cited that: