who is the best riparian rights attorney mn

Who has riparian rights to water in Minnesota?

Compare the best Water & Riparian Rights lawyers near Minneapolis, MN today. Use our free directory to instantly connect with verified Water & Riparian Rights attorneys.

What are riparian rights?

888-388-7261. 800 LaSalle Avenue, Suite 2800, Minneapolis, MN 55402. Robins Kaplan LLP helps clients in the Minnetonka area with their Minnesota Water & Riparian Rights needs.

What is a riparian owner of a lake?

“There are certain interests and rights vested in the shore owner which grow out of his special connection with such waters as an owner. These rights are common to all riparian owners on the same body of water, and they rest entirely upon the fact of title in the fee to the shore land.” – Justice Leroy E. Matson – Minnesota Supreme Court Every person who purchases a lake lot …

Are riparian rights a defense to a trespass claim?

F. Riparian rights. Riparian rights do not stem from who owns the lake bed but arise by reason of ownership of the shoreline. The Minnesota Supreme Court, in Adams, speaking through Commissioner Magney, stated “The decision was based …

Christensen Law Office PLLC

Protecting your property rights is our business. Experienced attorneys practicing in real estate transactions and litigation

Robins Kaplan LLP

Robins Kaplan LLP helps clients in the Minnetonka area with their Minnesota Water & Riparian Rights needs.

What is riparian rights?

Riparian rights are those rights inherent to the ownership of shoreline that permit the owner to use and enjoy the water. The right to “use and enjoy water” means the right to make use of a lake over its entire surface. But that use must be reasonable.

What happens if the public owns a lake?

If the public owns land that abuts a lake, such as a beach, a mutual right of enjoyment is shared by riparian owners and the public generally. On a public lake, therefore, the private owner has no more right to the recreational benefits such as boating, hunting, and fishing on that lake than does the general public.

Is it safe to install a dock and watercraft lift on a lake?

Important to many lake owners, it is also reasonable to install a dock and watercraft lift long enough to reach navigable water depths, so long as the dock and/or watercraft lift do not constitute a hazard to navigation or public health, safety, and welfare.

Is Lakeshore public or private?

Like all property, lakeshore is either privately or publicly owned and the general public can access water bodies or watercourses only through public property, not through private property.

Can you sell riparian rights in Crow Wing County?

But even the right to sell riparian rights is limited; many counties (including Crow Wing County) restrict the right to provide access to public waters for non-riparian owners through a riparian lot. It is possible, but difficult.

Who regulates riparian rights in Minnesota?

A landowner’s riparian rights are still subject to state regulation, which is promulgated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, which, in turn, often defers at least some authority to the local branches of government.

Can a lake lot owner interfere with riparian rights?

It cannot interfere with the exercise of similar rights on the part of the other abutting owners who share riparian rights. Of course a lake lot owner’s riparian rights, no matter how seemingly reasonable, are not limitless.

What are the three theories of change of the share of shoreline?

The three theories that apply to the changes of the share of shoreline are accretion, reliction and avulsion. Accretion is the gradual addition to shoreline caused by the washing of sand, dirt and gravel ashore. Reliction is the gradual recession of the water as it recedes and avulsion is rapid change in a water course.

What is the front line of a riparian parcel?

If you think of a riparian parcel as fronting on the water, the rear line and the side lines are usually ordinary lines in the survey system, such as section lines, quarter lines or sixteenth lines. The front line is the body of water and just inland from the shoreline is the meander line. This means that each riparian government lot certainly contains the land bounded by the meander line in front, the rear lot line and the side lot lines from the rear line down to the meander line. The difficult area is between the meander line and the body of water. Some factors to consider regarding property with a water boundary:

How do shorelines change shape?

Shorelines are so irregular that no mathematical formula can describe the curves with absolute precision. Any attempt to describe a shoreline boundary with absolute precision is futile because the curves are too complex and because the shorelines change shape as water levels change. Further, shorelines change from year to year through the natural processes of water erosion, wind erosion, beach formation and flooding.

What is meandering water?

Meandered waters are lakes and streams that were surveyed and platted on the original government land office surveys of Minnesota. The surveys were done primarily in the mid-1800’s. There are approximately 5480 meandered lakes shown on these surveys. If a lake is meandered but not determined to be navigable the bed is jointly owned by all of the landowners surrounding the lake. If the lake is drained or goes dry permanently, the owners may go to the court to determine the ownership of the lake bed.

Do riparian rights stem from who owns the lake bed?

Riparian rights do not stem from who owns the lake bed but arise by reason of ownership of the shoreline. The Minnesota Supreme Court, in Adams

What happens if a stream is meandered?

If a stream is non-navigable but has been meandered, the shoreland owners own to the thread (centerline) of the stream. If a lake or stream is non-navigable and not meandered, ownership of the bed is as indicated on individual property deeds. Also see: Pardon Me Myth!

What is the right to wharf out to a navigable depth?

They include the right to wharf out to a navigable depth; to take water for domestic and agricultural purposes; to use land added by accretion or exposed by reliction; to take ice; to fish, boat, hunt, swim; to such other uses as water bodies are normally put (see: Sanborn v .

Do riparians have rights?

Riparian rights exist whether or not the lake is navigable or public and regardless of who owns the bed. Riparians are entitled to exercise their rights over the entire surface of the lake. One riparian cannot keep others from using all of the lake.

Is a riparian property public or private?

Riparian property (property abutting a lake, river, or wetland) is either privately or publicly owned. The general public can access water bodies or watercourses via public property, but not through private property.

Is it illegal to trespass on private property?

Individuals entering private property without permission from the landowner are trespassing and may be prosecuted under the state trespass laws. It is illegal to trespass on private property in order to gain access to a water body or watercourse without first obtaining the verbal or written permission from a landowner.

What did the Johansens request?

After two particularly wet years, the Johansens requested that the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) delineate the extent of its wetland easements. The FWS refused to delineate the boundary of its easement, arguing that any and all wetlands, including those developing during wet years, are subject to the easements.

Why did respondent have the right to build a dock that began on his property and extended into the lake water?

This means that respondent had the right to build a dock that began on his property and extended into the lake water because a riparian owner possesses rights to use and enjoy the water that abuts his real property. Respondent’s status as a riparian owner negates the “unlawful entry” element of tortious trespass.

What did the court interpret the government's refusal to delineate the extent of its easements?

The court interpreted the government's refusal to delineate the extent of its easements, combined with its subsequent prosecution of the farmers attempting to drain the surplus water, as evidence of the government's failure to act in the spirit of a partnership.

Why did the court refuse to address the issue of a taking?

Because the court found the plaintiffs' right to exclude unaffected by either the public waters wetlands designation or the exact boundaries of the lake, the court refused to address the issue of a taking.

Is a riparian right an affirmative defense?

The Court of Appeal s noted that it was not entirely clear whether the assertion of riparian rights is an affirmative defense to a trespass claim. However, the district court’s finding that the found the respondent was a riparian owner. This means that respondent had the right to build a dock that began on his property and extended into ...

Is the Johansen's drained land a waterfowl protection area?

This meant that the land which the Johansen's drained was not in a Waterfowl Protection Area.