who is the attorney general of trinidad and tobago 2018

Who is the Attorney General in Trinidad and Tobago?

Faris Al-RawiAttorney General of Trinidad and TobagoMinister of Legal Affairs and Attorney General of Trinidad and TobagoIncumbent Faris Al-Rawi since September 9, 2015Office of the Attorney General and Ministry of Legal AffairsStyleThe HonourableMember ofHouse of Representatives Cabinet9 more rows

Who was attorney general in February 2018?

Matthew WhitakerIn office November 7, 2018 – February 14, 2019PresidentDonald TrumpDeputyRod RosensteinPreceded byJeff Sessions20 more rows

Is the attorney general of the US appointed?

The attorney general serves as the principal advisor to the president of the United States on all legal matters. ... Under the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution, the officeholder is nominated by the president of the United States, then appointed with the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Who is the current Attorney General of Jamaica?

Marlene Malahoo Forte, QC, MP, JP Passionate about public service, Marlene Patricia MALAHOO FORTE, Q.C., MP, is the Attorney General of Jamaica (since 2016 March 7) and Member of Parliament for the constituency of St James West Central (since 2016 Feb 25).

Who is the former attorney general?

California Former Attorneys GeneralMatthew Rodriguez2021 – 2021Kamala D. Harris2010 – 2017Edmund G. Brown, Jr.2007 – 2011Bill Lockyer1999 – 2007Daniel E. Lungren1991 – 199929 more rows

How many attorney general's are there in New York?

The Office of the Attorney General's thirteen Regional Offices help carry out the Attorney General's essential defensive, regulatory and affirmative justice functions in every part of New York State.

Who is the head of the Department of Justice 2021?

Attorney General Merrick B. GarlandMeet the Attorney General Attorney General Merrick B. Garland was sworn in as the 86th Attorney General of the United States on March 11, 2021.

Who is the head of the Department of Justice 2020?

Merrick GarlandThe department is headed by the U.S. Attorney General, who reports directly to the president of the United States and is a member of the president's Cabinet. The current attorney general is Merrick Garland, who was sworn on March 11, 2021.

Which department head is not a secretary?

Each department is headed by a "Secretary" of their respective department, with the exception of the Department of Justice, whose head is known as the "Attorney General".

What do they call lawyers in Ireland?

A barrister (also called "counsel") is a type of lawyer who specialises in court advocacy and giving legal opinions. To become a barrister, you must pass the exams set by the Kings Inns. The Kings Inns is the body which governs entry to the profession of barrister-at-law in Ireland.Sep 7, 2020

Does the attorney general have to be an MP?

In 1673 the attorney general began to take up a seat in the House of Commons, and since then it has been convention to ensure that all attorneys general are members of the House of Commons or House of Lords, although there is no requirement that they be so.

Does the attorney general have to be a member of Parliament?

The Attorney General need not be a Minister of Government, or a Member of Parliament. A private person may be appointed.

How long is Jason Jones in jail?

Section 13 of Trinidad and Tobago’s Sexual Offenses Act punishes “buggery,” or anal intercourse, punishable by sentences of up to 25 years in prison.

Who is Jason Jones?

Jason Jones, activist of the LGBT community celebrates with other activist court judgment outside the Hall of Justice in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, April 12, 2018. © 2018 REUTERS/Andrea de Silva.

What happened to Selwyn Dillon?

In November 1981 Selwyn Dillon was arrested and charged with the murder of his mother Grace Dillon. He was not entitled to bail and so remained incarcerated at the Remand Yard in Trinidad for about seven (7) years until his trial at the San Fernando Assizes, in May 1988. At that trial evidence was led that Mr. Dillon was suffering from a mental illness at the time of the act so as to make him not responsible in law for his actions.1 As a consequence, the trial judge, Justice Crane, directed the jury to enter a special verdict of guilty but insane, pursuant to section 66 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Chap. 12:02 (CPA).2

What are the two bases of an appeal?

There are generally two bases upon which the Court of Appeal will interfere with an award of damages: (i) error of law, where a judge has acted upon a wrong principle of law, or (ii) where the amount awarded is an entirely erroneous estimate of the damages. The first basis includes giving undue or insufficient weight to the evidence, or having regard to irrelevant or disregarding relevant and material evidence. Otherwise, the court of Appeal is generally disinclined to interfere with a trial Judge’s assessment of damages.4

How much was the exemplary award in Sham Jagdeo v. Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago?

exemplary award of $60,000.00 for assault, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Further, in the case of Sham Jagdeo v the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago

Who can be arrested without warrant?

“Where a police officer, with reasonable cause, suspects that an arrestable offence has been committed, he may arrest without warrant anyone whom he, with reasonable cause, suspects to be guilty of the offence.”

What is the evidence given by the claimant of when and where he was slapped and cursed?

67. The evidence given by the claimant of when and where he was slapped and cursed was internally inconsistent. As a matter of common sense it is reasonable to presume that the claimant would have a good recall of such an event. However, human frailty also dictates that mistakes are made in the giving of testimony so that the inconsistency within the claimant’s testimony could have been as a consequence of an honest mistake. An examination of the notes of evidence of the proceedings of the Magistrate’s Court does not assist as the claimant did not there directly testify that he was slapped at the station. His evidence is somewhat equivocal in that regard and may be capable of two interpretations. The relevant parts of the notes of evidence are as follows;

When was PC Sammy arrested?

105. The claimant submitted that PC Sammy testified that he was arrested at approximately 6:00 pm on the 16th May, 2013 and was taken to the station where he was placed in an interview room. The claimant further submitted that according to the evidence of PC Sammy, he remained in the charge room from 6:00 pm until approximately 7:30 pm until he was identified by Harold but was not formally charged until approximately 6:05 pm on the 18th May, 2013. According to the claimant, the defendant attempted to justify the almost forty-eight hour delay by stating that PC Sammy was conducting further investigations but that PC Sammy failed to address what amounted to further investigations in his witness statement.

What is the test for probable cause?

“…The test for reasonable and probable cause has a subjective as well as an objective element. The arresting officer must have an honest belief or suspicion that the suspect had committed an offence, and this belief or suspicion must be based on the existence of objective circumstances, which can reasonably justify the belief or suspicion. A police officer need not have evidence amounting to a prima facie case. Hearsay information including information from other officers may be sufficient to create reasonable grounds for arrest as long as that information is within the knowledge of the arresting officer: O’Hara v. Chief Constable (1977) 2 WLR 1; Clerk and Lindsell on Torts (18th ed.) para. 13-53. The lawfulness of the arrest is to be judged at the time of the arrest.”

Is there probable cause in the case of PC Sammy?

99. For there to have been reasonable and probable cause in respect of both the subjective and objective elements of the test, PC Sammy must have had an honest belief that on the information available to him at the time of the charge, there was a case fit to be tried both as a matter of his subjective belief and also as a matter of objective assessment by the court.

What is a 135. pillar?

135. The claimant’s case was based on four pillars. He has barely succeeded on two. It means that the defendant has succeeded in respect of two major aspects of the claim. In those circumstances, the court is of the view each party shall bear its own costs and the court shall so order.