who is the attorney for coastal pacific

by Ms. Marjolaine Armstrong I 9 min read

Who is Pacific Coast legal services?

Pacific Coast Legal Services is an attorney service company providing litigation support services to attorneys, insurance companies and corporations. Pacific Coast Legal Services is an attorney service company providing litigation support services to attorneys, insurance companies and corporations.

Why choose Pacific Coast legal?

Pacific Coast Legal will file court documents by your deadline, even in courts with long lines and shortened filing hours. Prepare and submit your time-sensitive court filing from the convenience of your desktop.

Who is the president and CEO of coastal?

Since joining CPFD in November 2006, Jeff has become an integral part of Coastal and has prospered in his former key roles as both Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer within the organization. As President & CEO, Jeff will have responsibility for all of the Company’s worldwide operations.

Who is the president of Coastal Community Development Foundation?

Jeff King was appointed President in May 2019. Since joining CPFD in November 2006, Jeff has become an integral part of Coastal and has prospered in his former key roles as both Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer within the organization.

image

Who are the members of the California Coastal Commission?

Among those who formally expressed grave concerns about the coastal fracking proposal are the California Coastal Commission and three members of Congress from California, Lois Capps (CA-24), Sam Farr (CA-20) and Jared Huffman (CA-2).

What is the role of the California Attorney General?

The California Attorney General has long been involved in efforts to protect the state's resources from negative environmental and public health impacts of oil and gas production.

What is the Attorney General's complaint?

The Attorney General’s complaint, filed today in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alle ges that in issuing this environmental assessment and finding no significant impact the Department of the Interior violated the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and the Coastal Zone Management Act.

Coastal Pacific Lending is much more than just a lender

We’re your partner in helping to make your dreams of homeownership your ultimate reality. We take time to listen to your specific needs and to understand your unique situation so we can help match you with a new mortgage or refinance option that’ll fit you perfectly.

Our Promise

From the start of your financing application to closing day and beyond, Coastal Pacific Lending is committed to you and your dream of homeownership. We promise you a simple and transparent process that’ll never leave you in the dark.

Our Mission

To help make homeownership and the American Dream a possibility for more families across California, Arizona, Texas, and Colorado with simple and transparent mortgage and refinancing options tailored to each family’s unique needs.

Our Vision

To become the choice home lender of families across the US and be the standard-bearer for exceptional personalized customer service in the mortgage and refinancing industries.

How many members are on the California coastal commission?

T he California Coastal Commission has 12 voting members and 3 non-voting members. Six of the voting members are "public members," and six are local elected officials who come from specific coastal districts. All voting members are appointed either by the Governor, Senate Rules Committee, or the Speaker of the Assembly;

Can coastal commissioners send written materials?

No written materials should be sent to Coastal Commissioners unless the Commission staff receives copies of all of the same materials at the same time. All materials transmitted to Commissioners should clearly indicate (e.g., on the cover page or envelope) that they have also been forwarded to the staff.

California Coastal Commission Enforcement Defense Lawyer

The California Coastal Commission enforces access to the California coastline and beaches in the State of California. The California Coastal Commission enforces regulations for Coastal Development Permits (CDPs) and coastal habitats and coastal public access.

California Coastal Commission Investigation Defense Lawyer

The majority of California Coastal Commission investigations begin with the filing of a consumer Complaint. However, California Coastal Commission Investigations also occur through sting operations and criminal investigations. The California Coastal Commission utilizes non sworn civilian investigators to conduct investigations.

California Coastal Commission Citation and Enforcement Action Defense Attorney

A California Coastal Commission Administrative disciplinary enforcement action contains numerous consequences. Maximum fines for violations are astronomical. In many instances, these fines can be reduced through negotiations with the California Coastal Commission.

California Coastal Commission Hearing Attorney

The California Coastal Commission is headquartered in Sacrament and maintains several District Office locations. These District locations are in Arcata, Long Beach, San Diego, San Francisco Santa Cruz and Ventura. In some instances, Hearings may be held in Los Angeles, Oakland, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo.

Who is Brian at CPFD?

Over the course of over 25+ years at CPFD, Brian has had oversight in the inception and significant expansion and growth of CPFD’s PV program supporting our US Troops “around the globe”, working closely with the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support (DLA TA), Air Force Non-Appropriated Funds ( AFNAF) and the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA).

Who is Pat Ranga?

Pat Ranga joined the Coastal Pacific Food Distributors (CPFD) Team in April 2010 as Vice President EDI/E-Commerce to support the rapid growth of CPF EDI initiatives/projects. Prior to this appointment, Pat was the EDI Manager at MDV/Nash Finch with responsibilities to support both MDV and CPFD EDI operations in a joint IT services model.

When did Brian join CPFD?

In 1995 Brian joined CPFD in conjunction with CPFD’s acquisition of Select Foods, where he was the Head Buyer in charge of both commissary and Lucky Northern CA procurement programs.

What did Chris work for before CPFD?

Prior to CPFD, Chris worked for an enterprise systems integrator on a team enhancing and upgrading ERP software for manufacturers and distributors.

Who is Monika Bertke?

In June 2006 Monika was named Vice President of Finance and an Officer of the Company. Prior to CPFD she held various financial management positions with Fleming Foods in their franchise retail Food-4-Less division. Previous management positions in retail and manufacturing included jobs in procurement, transportation, internal audit and retail sales.

Who is Chris Hott?

Chris Hott joined CPFD in 2016 as Director of Information Technology overseeing its technical infrastructure and systems across multiple distributions centers. Chris was previously consulting for Coastal Pacific and was instrumental in their split of IT operations from a sister distribution company in 2010 and their journey to the cloud starting with Office 365 in 2011. He has assumed roles of increasing responsibility while at CPFD and is now Chief Information Officer. Most recently, Chris has been leading Coastal’s cyber security program and their efforts on NIST 800-171 compliance and DoD Cybersecurity Maturity Model Level 3 certification.

Who is Jeff in CPFD?

In March 2008, Jeff was given the additional role overseeing CPFD's Prime Vendor Food Service Division, where he was responsible for administering contracts with the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support (DLA TS), formerly the Defense Supply Center Philadelphia (DSCP) in Japan, Singapore, Diego Garcia, the Philippines and as a subcontractor in Iraq, Kuwait, Jordan and most recently Afghanistan. Jeff has been integral in the writing, submission, and subsequent award of CPFD's key Prime Vendor contracts.

image

Opinion

Factual and Procedural Background

  • Coastal Pacific hired Raines as a billing clerk in 1998 and terminated her employment in 2014. Raines filed suit against Coastal Pacific, alleging age discrimination, disability discrimination, and related claims. As relevant here, the first amended complaint alleged Coastal Pacific failed to furnish Raines and other employees accurate itemized wag...
See more on leagle.com

Section 226 and Its Enforcement

  • (1)Section 226(a) requires an employer to provide employees with an accurate itemized wage statement including nine specified items. One of the items to be included in the wage statement is "all applicable hourly rates in effect during the pay period." (§ 226(a), item (9).) Here, the parties stipulated that Raines received wage statements that did not show the overtime hourly rate. Thu…
See more on leagle.com

Injury Under Section 226

  • Raines contends the trial court erred in granting summary adjudication on her individual claim for statutory penalties under section 226(e) for the failure to provide an accurate wage statement, specifically the failure to provide the hourly overtime rate. She contends there are triable issues of fact [23 Cal.App.5th 676]as to whether she suffered injury as well as whether Coastal Pacific's f…
See more on leagle.com

Whether Injury Is Required For Paga Claim

  • The trial court granted summary adjudication on Raines's PAGA claim because it found Raines was required to show injury for that representative claim as well as for the section 226(e) claim. Raines repeats her earlier contention that there is a triable issue of fact as to injury, and further contends that even if she cannot establish injury, injury is not required for the PAGA claim. Sinc…
See more on leagle.com

Alleged Procedural Errors

  • Raines contends the trial court erred procedurally in reversing its previous order denying Coastal Pacific's motion for summary adjudication on the labor law violations. Raines contends the court was required to solicit briefing and hold a hearing before changing its order. Instead, according to Raines, the court improperly granted an untimely motion for reconsideration. Raines relies on Le …
See more on leagle.com

Disposition

  • The judgment is reversed as to the PAGA claim only. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(3).) Raye, P. J., and Renner, J., concurred.
See more on leagle.com