Those who believe they have been a witness to attorney misconduct — clients, members of the public, members of the legal community, and judges — have the right to file a grievance against a Texas attorney.
You can confront opposing counsel with evidence of the misconduct, confirm whether she denies it or can explain it, and if appropriate, notify her as a courtesy that you intend to file disciplinary charges. See Roy D. Simon, Threatening to File Grievance Against Opposing Counsel (cited by the ABCNY committee).
An attorney cannot use threats against someone to gain an advantage in a civil matter. However, the attorney can warn that person that he is about to file a lawsuit to resolve a matter. * This will flag comments for moderators to take action.
If the lawyer becomes uncivil, or threatens action he knows he cannot take, such as threatening criminal charges, that would be unethical. * This will flag comments for moderators to take action.
The United States Attorney's Office, in coordination with the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice, is charged with enforcing the federal civil rights laws throughout the Southern District of Texas.
Perhaps the most common kinds of complaints against lawyers involve delay or neglect. This doesn't mean that occasionally you've had to wait for a phone call to be returned. It means there has been a pattern of the lawyer's failing to respond or to take action over a period of months.
The misconduct includes theft, misapplication of fiduciary property, or the failure to return, after demand, a clearly unearned fee; or. The misconduct has resulted in a substantial injury to the client, the public, the legal system, or the profession; or.
File a ComplaintConsumer Protection Complaints. Consumer Protection Hotline: (800) 621-0508. ... Sanctuary Complaints. Sanctuary Complaints Hotline: (844) 584-3006. ... Handgun License Holder Complaints. Handgun License Holder Complaints Hotline: (844) 584-3006. ... Charitable Trusts Complaints. File a Complaint.
The rules of legal ethics in most states require attorneys to be honest and to be able to do their job at a certain level of competence. If you feel that your legal representative has lied or misled you, or is performing their duties at a level below that of a competent attorney, you may want to file a lawsuit.
Formal complaint against [name of lawyer or law firm] describe what the lawyer had been hired to do for you [for example dealing with the sale or purchase of a house] • say when this was [give the date or dates when the problem occurred]. My complaint is that [list what you think went wrong or wasn't done properly.
The most common penalties for violating ethical rules are disbarment, suspension, and public or private censure. Disbarment is the revocation of an attorney's state license, permanently rendering the attorney unqualified to practice law.
In Section 27, Rule 138 of the Rules of Court, it is expressly provided that Attorneys can be removed or suspended by Supreme Court on the following grounds: deceit, malpractice, or other gross misconduct in such office, grossly immoral conduct, or. by reason of his conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, or.
Private reprimand means disciplinary action to formally reprove or censure a licensee for unprofessional or unlawful conduct, with the documentation of the action being classified as a private record.
The FTC cannot resolve individual complaints, but it can provide information about what steps to take. The FTC says that complaints can help it and its law enforcement partners detect patterns of fraud and abuse, which may lead to investigations and stopping unfair business practices.
Call 800-252-8154....An ombudsman can:Answer questions.Help you file a complaint.Tell you about your rights.
Report Public Corruption For more information regarding how to file a complaint or contact a Texas Ranger near you, visit the Texas Department of Public Safety's website by clicking here. The Texas Rangers' Public Integrity Unit and Public Corruption Unit may also be contacted via telephone at 512-424-2160.
The grievance concerns a lawyer who has been disbarred, has resigned, or is deceased. The grievance concerns a person who is not licensed as an attorney (handled by the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee). The grievance is filed against a sitting judge (handled by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct). ...
Once the grievance is classified as a Complaint, it is sent to the respondent lawyer who has 30 days from receipt to respond. Within 60 days of the response deadline, the CDC, through its investigation, must determine whether there is Just Cause to believe that professional misconduct occurred. This investigation may include the following: 1 Requesting additional information from the complainant 2 Obtaining information from corroborative witnesses 3 Receipts 4 Hourly records or billing statements 5 Correspondence to and from client 6 Message slips, telephone logs, or records of long-distance telephone calls 7 Court records, such as pleadings, motions, orders and docket sheets 8 Copies of settlement checks and/or disbursement statements 9 IOLTA or trust account records, such as monthly bank statements, deposit slips, deposit items and disbursement items 10 State Bar Membership Department records including records of current or past administrative suspensions 11 Client file 12 Witness interviews and obtaining sworn statements
The respondent has 20 days to notify the CDC whether he or she chooses to have the case heard before an evidentiary panel of the grievance committee or by a district court, with or without a jury. This choice is referred to as the respondent’s election. A respondent who fails to elect will have the case tried before an evidentiary panel of the grievance committee.
This determination is referred to as classification of the grievance and is made within 30 days of the filing of the grievance. If the grievance does not allege professional misconduct, it is classified as an Inquiry and dismissed.
Grievances are dismissed for various reasons, including the following: The grievance concerns the outcome of a case but does not specify a violation of an ethics rule. The grievance does not involve a lawyer’s conduct in his or her professional capacity. The grievance is filed too late. The grievance is duplicative or identical to a previous filing.
In both types of proceedings, the parties are the Commission for Lawyer Discipline represented by the Chief Disciplinary Counsel, and the respondent lawyer. It is the Commission’s burden to prove the allegations of professional misconduct by a preponderance of the evidence.
During the middle of a trial, attorney Jack Yetiv threatened to file a disciplinary grievance against opposing counsel Bruce Wilkin unless Wilkin told the trial judge that Wilkin was withdrawing an argument Wilkin had made in court.
In his fifth and sixth issues, Yetiv contends that there is no evidence and insufficient evidence to prove he made the threat of disciplinary charges to “gain an advantage” in a civil matter. In his third and fourth issues, Yetiv contends that even if there was an advantage to be gained, the threat was not made “solely” to gain an advantage.
Yetiv contends that neither the email nor the witnesses’ testimony showed that Yetiv sought to gain an advantage in the Westview Yetiv suggests *11 that Rule 4.04 (b) (1) should only encompass a quid pro quo involving the lawyer receiving a financial benefit of some kind. For example, this court held that evidence was sufficient to discipline a lawyer when the lawyer relayed to the opposing party (his then-wife) that he would report the party’s alleged criminal conduct if the litigation was not resolved by settlement. See Vickery v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 5 S.W.3d 241, 261-62 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. denied). Similarly, another court of appeals held that evidence was sufficient to discipline a lawyer when the lawyer threatened to report his former client’s stalking behavior to authorities in the same conversation that the lawyer asked the client to pay legal fees. See Weiss v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 981 S.W.2d 8, 17-19 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. denied).
At the conclusion of the trial, the court made several statements to suggest that the court had reviewed transcripts from the Westview trial, which were not offered into evidence in this case:
The principle of confidentiality is given effect not only in the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct but also in the law of evidence regarding the attorney-client privilege and in the law of agency. The attorney-client privilege, developed through many decades, provides the client a right to prevent certain confidential communications ...
Privileged information refers to the information of a client protected by the lawyer-client privilege of Rule 5.03 of the Texas Rules of Evidence or of Rule 5.03 of the Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence or by the principles of attorney-client privilege governed by Rule 5.01 of the Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates. Unprivileged client information means all information relating to a client or furnished by the client, other than privileged information, acquired by the lawyer during the course of or by reason of the representation of the client.#N#(b) Except as permitted by paragraphs (c) and (d), or as required by paragraphs (e), and (f), a lawyer shall not knowingly:
The ethical obligation of the lawyer to protect the confidential information of the client not only facilitates the proper representation of the client but also encourages potential clients to seek early legal assistance. 2. Subject to the mandatory disclosure requirements of paragraphs (e) and ...
Both the fiduciary relationship existing between lawyer and client and the proper functioning of the legal system require the preservation by the lawyer of confidential information of one who has employed or sought to employ the lawyer. Free discussion should prevail between lawyer and client in order for ...
Unprivileged client information means all information relating to a client or furnished by the client, other than privileged information, acquired by the lawyer during the course of or by reason of the representation of the client. (1) Reveal confidential information of a client or a former client to:
The attorney-client privilege, developed through many decades, provides the client a right to prevent certain confidential communications from being revealed by compulsion of law. Several sound exceptions to confidentiality have been developed in the evidence law of privilege.
First, the lawyer may not counsel or assist a client in conduct that is criminal or fraudulent. See Rule 1.02 (c). As noted in the Comment to that Rule there can be situations where the lawyer may have to reveal information relating to the representation in order to avoid assisting a client's criminal or fraudulent conduct, and sub-paragraph (c) (4) permits doing so. A lawyer's duty under Rule 3.03 (a) not to use false or fabricated evidence is a special instance of the duty prescribed in Rule 1.02 (c) to avoid assisting a client in criminal or fraudulent conduct , and sub-paragraph (c) (4) permits revealing information necessary to comply with Rule 3.03 (a) or (b). The same is true of compliance with Rule 4.01. See also paragraph (f).
Texas Laws and Rules 1 Texas Government Code, Chapter 81, Subchapter E#N#Discusses the discipline of attorneys. 2 Texas Government Code, Chapter 82, Subchapter C#N#Discusses attorney conduct. 3 Texas Disciplinary Rules Of Professional Conduct [PDF]#N#The rules of conduct that all Texas attorneys must follow from the Texas State Bar. 4 Texas Rules Of Disciplinary Procedure [PDF]#N#From the State Bar: These rules establish the procedures that must be followed in a lawyer discipline case, including how the disciplinary system works and how cases are handled. 5 The Code of Judicial Conduct#N#The Code of Judicial Conduct is available from the Texas Courts online website. 6 Texas Government Code, Chapter 34#N#This chapter discusses the Code of Judicial Conduct.
The Texas State Law Library has many other resources in addition to the highlights we present below. Please call us at (512) 463-1722 if you have any questions about these materials.
Texas Jurisprudence (commonly referred to as "Tex Jur") is a legal encyclopedia that provides researchers with citations on a wide range of topics. This resource is also available electronically in the library.
Conversely, any failure to follow the guidance on grievance procedures provided by Acas is highly likely to reflect badly on your working practices, such that this could cast doubt on any defence you may raise to a claim, potentially lending support to even a malicious or vexatious complaint. Additionally, any award of damages made against you following a successful claim, could be increased by up to 25%.
You must communicate your decision to the complainant in writing, again without unreasonable delay, together with what action will be taken. The complainant must also be informed of their right to appeal this decision if they are not content with the outcome, or if they feel that any part of the grievance procedure was wrong or unfair.
How you decide to handle the making of a malicious grievance will depend on the facts of each case. Where the evidence clearly points towards the complaint being wholly unfounded and deliberately designed to mislead or cause trouble for either yourself or someone else at work, it may be appropriate to commence disciplinary proceedings against the complainant.
If a grievance is not upheld by your employer, you should be informed of this decision in writing without unreasonable delay. You should also be informed of your right to appeal the outcome, if you disagree with this, or if you think any part of the grievance procedure was wrong or unfair.
Under UK data protection laws, you have the right to request access to information about you that is held on file. This could include evidence relating to a grievance made against you at work , although your employer can refuse to disclose any document that would also reveal information about a third party, and that party has asked for this to be kept anonymous.
The Acas Code of Practice provides practical guidance to employers and employees setting out the basic principles of fairness for handling disciplinary and grievance situations at work. Although a failure to follow the Code does not, in itself, make an employer or organisation liable to proceedings, any unreasonable failure to comply with its provisions will be taken into account by an employment tribunal if the matter proceeded that far.
In identifying malicious or vexatious complaints, employers must be careful to ensure that they can satisfy, as far as possible, as to the falsity or otherwise of a grievance raised. You must also be careful to distinguish between employees who are raising genuine concerns and those who are being intentionally difficult. In some instances, a person may feel genuinely aggrieved or frustrated by a workplace problem, or how they have been treated at work, resulting in an unintentionally unfounded complaint.