Jul 05, 2017 · Without a waiver from the Deputy Attorney General based on compelling reasons, an employee is prohibited from engaging in outside employment that involves: ... No present or former employee or anyone acting on behalf of the United States shall knowingly disclose any contractor bid or source selection information before the award of the contract ...
Oct 21, 2021 · Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) grilled Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday about whether he sought ethics counsel before issuing a memo responding to the National School Board Association’s request for the DOJ to address threats and violence from parents upset about critical race theory being added to school curriculum.
§ 509. Functions of the Attorney General § 509A. National Security Division § 509B. Section to enforce human rights laws § 510. Delegation of authority § 511. Attorney General to advise the President § 512. Attorney General to advise heads of executive departments § 513. Attorney General to advise Secretaries of military departments § 514.
Apr 12, 2018 · The American Bar Association developed the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility to act a guideline for ethical conduct and help resolve moral and ethical dilemmas. While this code is not binding, it does comprehensively lay out guidelines for state bar associations – or even attorneys who find an unclear area of the codes in their state ...
United States Attorney General | |
---|---|
Reports to | President of the United States |
Seat | Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building Washington, D.C. |
Appointer | President of the United States with United States Senate advice and consent |
Term length | No fixed term |
Code of Conduct for United States Judges. Federal judges must abide by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, a set of ethical principles and guidelines adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States. The Code of Conduct provides guidance for judges on issues of judicial integrity and independence, ...
Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees. Employees of the federal Judiciary are expected to observe high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the Judiciary are preserved and the judicial employee's office reflects a devotion to serving the public. Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees.
Judges may not hear cases in which they have either personal knowledge of the disputed facts, a personal bias concerning a party to the case, earlier involvement in the case as a lawyer, or a financial interest in any party or subject matter of the case.
This important role is recognized in the Code of Conduct, which encourages judges to engage in activities to improve the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice. Code of Conduct for United States Judges.
Employees of the federal Judiciary are expected to observe high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the Judiciary are preserved and the judicial employee's office reflects a devotion to serving the public.
The Judicial Conference of the United States has authorized its Committee on Codes of Conduct to publish formal advisory opinions on ethical issues that are frequently raised or have broad application. These opinions provide ethical guidance for judges and judicial employees and assist in the interpretation of the codes ...
The American Bar Association developed the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility to act a guideline for ethical conduct and help resolve moral and ethical dilemmas.
Zealous Representation. A lawyer should represent a client zealously within the bounds of the law. However, in cases where a client’s conduct could arguably be illegal, a lawyer may refuse aid or participate in such conduct. Furthermore, a lawyer may not assert a position, file a suit, delay trial, or take actions on behalf of a client, ...
The Attorney General’s duty, on behalf of the Executive Branch, to be responsive to Congress on matters within the latter’s responsibility should be sufficient assurance that information will be appropriately shared. ”. The Attorney General’s regulations are silent about reporting on impeachment matters.
The appointment provisions of the Independent Counsel Act applied to the investigation of “persons.” In 1993, the Senate proposed that the Act permit the Attorney General “to use the independent counsel process in matters raising conflict of interest concerns, without having to name specific individuals as investigatory targets,” S. Rep. No. 101, 103d Cong., 1st Sess. 37 (1993), but that amendment was deleted in conference. The new regulation, as the Senate had proposed in 1993, authorizes the appointment of special counsel for a “matter” without requiring the naming of a person.
Section 600.7 has two provisions on redressing misconduct by special counsel. Section 600.7 (c) addresses substantive and procedural issues regarding discipline. First, substantively, regarding the norms of conduct, “Special Counsel and staff shall be subject to disciplinary action for misconduct and breach of ethical duties under the same standards and to the same extent as are other employees of the Department of Justice.” “Inquiries” into disciplinary matters shall be handled by “the appropriate offices of the Department,” with the caveat that those inquiries be “upon the approval of the Attorney General.”