Which of the following is the MOST accurate statement regarding the relationship between eyewitness testimony and how it is used in the legal system? Confident witnesses are more likely to be believed, but are probably no more accurate.
You are a forensic psychologist testifying about the sanity of someone. The question that is hardest for you to be sure of answering correctly is: Was the defendant sane at the time of the crime? What can a person who is found to be guilty but also mentally ill expect?
Which person would never have to stand trial for a crime he or she might have committed? One judged not guilty by reason of insanity. A man killed a stranger in a fit of rage when he heard voices telling him that the stranger was about to destroy the Earth and must be stopped.
What must be true before a person may be tried for a crime and potentially found guilty? The person must be capable of helping to defending himself or herself in court.
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5; APA 2013), malingering is defined as “intentional production of false or grossly exaggerated physical or psychological symptoms, motivated by external incentives such as avoiding military duty, avoiding work, obtaining financial compensation, evading criminal ...
Unfortunately, malingering is very difficult to detect. Psychologists use a wide variety of approaches, including the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2nd version (MMPI-2). Multiscale inventories and projective measures may also be useful.
The MOST common diagnosis of those found not guilty by reason of insanity is: schizophrenia.
Civil commitment - The legal process of placing a person in a mental institution, even against his or her will. Criminal commitment - The legal process of confining a person found not guilty by reason of insanity in a mental institution.
Good mental health is characterised by a person's ability to fulfil a number of key functions and activities, including: the ability to learn. the ability to feel, express and manage a range of positive and negative emotions. the ability to form and maintain good relationships with others.
With exceptions, every crime has at least three elements: a criminal act, also called actus reus; a criminal intent, also called mens rea; and concurrence of the two.
The three elements of most crimes are good duty, the breach of the duty, and criminal intent. Generally, all the jurors must vote for conviction before a person can be convicted of a crime. The existence of a duty in criminal law is usually proved in court by the testimony of an expert witness.
Some common procedural defenses are entrapment by the government, false confession by witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a speedy trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
One common question presented to jurors is, “Are there any religious beliefs that prevent you from passing judgment on another person?” Frederick says this is to weed out people whose faith might impede their ability to view a case objectively .
The plaintiff attorney or prosecutor will generally look for people more inclined to trust authority.
According to the Synchronics Group Trial Consultants, a “nurturing, open, receptive and generous person” will likely wear casual shoes “with plenty of room for the toes, because these people don't want to be hemmed in . No pointy tips. The heels will be low, because open people want to be able to move around easily.
For example, “if it’s a medical malpractice case and there’s a woman and all of her friends are nurses, that might bias her a little bit,” says Matthew Ferrara, Ph.D, a trial consultant and forensic psychologist. And if you have friends or family in law enforcement, that’s a big red flag. “In a criminal case, relationship to someone in law enforcement is paramount,” Ferrara says. “People who are probation officers, police officers, jailers or are related to the same type of profession would be probably viewed as biased toward the prosecution.”
YOUR BODY LANGUAGE. Non-verbal behavior can say a lot about what you’re thinking. “We’re not mind readers,” says Frederick, “but you can see behaviors indicating they are really not receptive to you at all, or they’re very receptive to you, and you pay attention to that.”.
Indeed, research shows that if you don’t vibe well with an attorney, you’re more likely to decide against their argument. “One attorney told me, 'If I can tell they don’t like me, I get rid of them,’” King says.
Leaders, contrarians, and independent thinkers can be pivotal in a verdict. These people have the potential to rally the rest of the group behind a unanimous decision, which is great for the plaintiff or the prosecutor.
Responsible for the crimes they commit and capable of defending themselves in court. Defendants who are actively hallucinating and experiencing delusions during the times of their trials are most likely to be. Committed for treatment until they prove enough to defend themselves.
This is called... Criminal commitment.
The version of the insanity defense that declares that a person cannot be held responsible for his or her actions if those actions were the result of mental disease or mental defect is called the... Durham test.
Civil commitment. If parents go to a mental health professional and seek to have their son committed, and the mental health professional agrees and involuntarily commits the son without a hearing or the opportunity for the son to contest the decision, we know that the son is probably... A minor.
The aspect of state responsibility that promotes and protects the interests of individuals even from themselves is called. Parens patriae. The principles of parens patriae (parent of the country) permits the state to make decisions that promote an individual's best interest. It has been used to support the process of.
Requires clear and convincing proof. According to the US Supreme Court, the standard for "clear and convincing proof" is. 75% certainity. In the past, people with mental disorders were less likely than those without mental disorders tom commit violent or dangerous acts.
He is likely to be sent to a mental institution because. He was mentally unstable at the time of the trail and unable to defend himself.