Which of the following questions is an attorney MOST likely to ask his or her jury specialist? What approach should I take in order to get the jury to favor my side? Someone you know who has body dysmorphic disorder is considering plastic surgery.
One of the most crucial tasks a trial attorney must undertake is selecting a pool of jurors that will view her client's case in the most favorable light possible. By carefully crafting and preparing a series of questions to ask potential jurors, a trial attorney …
Apr 01, 2015 · To sniff out bias, lawyers will ask jurors if they agree with statements like, “If someone is charged, they’re probably guilty,” or “Laws do more to protect the rights of criminal defendants and...
A man got into a fight in which he killed his opponent. When he went to trial, he had a mental breakdown, did not know where he was, and was unable to answer questions. He is likely to be sent to a mental institution because. He was mentally unstable at the time of the trail and unable to defend himself.
Which of the following is the MOST accurate statement regarding the relationship between eyewitness testimony and how it is used in the legal system? Confident witnesses are more likely to be believed, but are probably no more accurate.
You are a forensic psychologist testifying about the sanity of someone. The question that is hardest for you to be sure of answering correctly is: Was the defendant sane at the time of the crime? What can a person who is found to be guilty but also mentally ill expect?
Which person would never have to stand trial for a crime he or she might have committed? One judged not guilty by reason of insanity. A man killed a stranger in a fit of rage when he heard voices telling him that the stranger was about to destroy the Earth and must be stopped.
What must be true before a person may be tried for a crime and potentially found guilty? The person must be capable of helping to defending himself or herself in court.
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5; APA 2013), malingering is defined as “intentional production of false or grossly exaggerated physical or psychological symptoms, motivated by external incentives such as avoiding military duty, avoiding work, obtaining financial compensation, evading criminal ...
Most neuropsychologists include so-called symptom validity tests in their test batteries, such as the F scale in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). These scales are fairly accurate in detecting a pattern of false exaggeration of symptoms.
People with any severe mental illness were more likely to have a history of violence compared with people without severe mental illness, consistent with other research. As a result, the data suggest that the incidence of violence is higher for people with severe mental illness than for those without.
Civil commitment - The legal process of placing a person in a mental institution, even against his or her will. Criminal commitment - The legal process of confining a person found not guilty by reason of insanity in a mental institution.
Good mental health is characterised by a person's ability to fulfil a number of key functions and activities, including: the ability to learn. the ability to feel, express and manage a range of positive and negative emotions. the ability to form and maintain good relationships with others.
With exceptions, every crime has at least three elements: a criminal act, also called actus reus; a criminal intent, also called mens rea; and concurrence of the two.
The three elements of most crimes are good duty, the breach of the duty, and criminal intent. Generally, all the jurors must vote for conviction before a person can be convicted of a crime. The existence of a duty in criminal law is usually proved in court by the testimony of an expert witness.
Some common procedural defenses are entrapment by the government, false confession by witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a speedy trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
One common question presented to jurors is, “Are there any religious beliefs that prevent you from passing judgment on another person?” Frederick says this is to weed out people whose faith might impede their ability to view a case objectively .
Open and receptive jurors, according to the Synchronics Group Trial Consultants, will have hair that is “casual and naturally flowing, rather than highly styled or gelled or plastered to the head … Beards and mustaches will be natural looking, rather than designed and sculpted.” The old adage says you can’t judge a book by its cover, but attorneys will certainly try.
Indeed, research shows that if you don’t vibe well with an attorney, you’re more likely to decide against their argument. “One attorney told me, 'If I can tell they don’t like me, I get rid of them,’” King says.
For example, “if it’s a medical malpractice case and there’s a woman and all of her friends are nurses, that might bias her a little bit,” says Matthew Ferrara, Ph.D, a trial consultant and forensic psychologist. And if you have friends or family in law enforcement, that’s a big red flag. “In a criminal case, relationship to someone in law enforcement is paramount,” Ferrara says. “People who are probation officers, police officers, jailers or are related to the same type of profession would be probably viewed as biased toward the prosecution.”
According to the Synchronics Group Trial Consultants, a “nurturing, open, receptive and generous person” will likely wear casual shoes “with plenty of room for the toes, because these people don't want to be hemmed in . No pointy tips. The heels will be low, because open people want to be able to move around easily.
This is called... Criminal commitment.
The version of the insanity defense that declares that a person cannot be held responsible for his or her actions if those actions were the result of mental disease or mental defect is called the... Durham test.
A therapist who broke confidentiality with a patient without the patient's consent because of fears that the person would harm someone else was acting according to the ethical principle of.
In the case of Foucha v Louisiana, the Supreme Court ruled that the only acceptable basis for determining the release of hospitalized offenders is whether they are still. Insane. Some states have adopted a verdict of guilty but mentally ill. The sentence that must be given to those so convicted is.
Civil commitment. If parents go to a mental health professional and seek to have their son committed, and the mental health professional agrees and involuntarily commits the son without a hearing or the opportunity for the son to contest the decision, we know that the son is probably... A minor.