which of the following is the legal opposite of a defense attorney who acts like a double agent?

When does the attorney client privilege apply to a lawyer?

Terms in this set (20) What is a lawyer who advises, represents, and acts for his or her client (the defendant)? Defense Attorney. When did criminal defense attorneys become significant players in the criminal process? Around the 1730s. When did the number of lawyers surge? After the American Revolution.

Are communications between a defendant and an attorney protected by privilege?

accused right to have assistance of counsel for his defense. Gideon vs. Wainwright. states have to afford counsel to all felony cases. Argersinger vs. Hamlin. right to counsel if they face any jail time in state or federal cases. public defender system or a contract system.

What is the difference between attorney client privilege and duty of confidentiality?

The attorney-client privilege is a rule that preserves the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and clients. Under that rule, attorneys may not divulge their clients' secrets, nor may others force them to. The purpose of the privilege is to encourage clients to openly share information with their lawyers and to let lawyers provide ...

What is an attorney-at-law?

The attorney-client relationship is a fiduciary relationship and, just as in other fiduciary relationship, the attorney’s dealings with the beneficiary – the client – are subject to special legal scrutiny. As one Illinois court has put it: The law places special obligations upon an attorney by virtue of the relationship

What is the opposite of a defense attorney?

A criminal defense attorney represents the defendant (person accused of a crime). The opposite of a criminal defense attorney is called a prosecutor. The prosecutor works for the State (whatever state the alleged crime is committed in.)

What are the two types of defense attorneys?

What are the types of criminal lawyers? When it comes to criminal lawyers, there are two basic types of criminal lawyers people most often familiar with – a criminal defense lawyer, which is usually referred to simply as a criminal lawyer, and a prosecutor.

Are defense attorneys double agents?

The defense lawyer has a double function in the investigation phase of the criminal process: to assist the suspect in gathering exonerating evidence and to protect him from violations of his rights at the hands of law-enforcement personnel.

Which of the following is considered by many to be the classic defense ethical dilemma?

Confidential confession. What if the defendant confesses to the crime but only to his or her attorney? This is the classic defense ethical dilemma.

What are three types of defense counsel?

The Defense Attorney These fall into three broad categories: assigned counsel, contract systems, and public defenders.

What are the four major criminal law defenses?

When it comes to criminal cases, there are usually four major criminal defense strategies that criminal attorneys employ: innocence, constitutional violations, self-defense, and insanity.

What is the meaning of defense attorney?

Defense attorney, also known as a defense lawyer, is an attorney representing a defendant in a lawsuit or criminal prosecution.

Are attorneys the same as lawyers?

Lawyers are people who have gone to law school and often may have taken and passed the bar exam. Attorney has French origins, and stems from a word meaning to act on the behalf of others. The term attorney is an abbreviated form of the formal title 'attorney at law'.

What is the role of defense lawyer?

A criminal defence attorney is responsible for putting together an effective defence and developing a winning strategy for their clients. As the accused's advocate and drafter, he must prepare, file, and argue on their behalf. Negotiating a plea bargain with the prosecution is part of a lawyer's job description.

What do the statistics show regarding the differences between privately retained defense attorneys and public defenders?

What do the statistics show regarding the differences between privately retained defense attorneys and public defenders? Privately retained defense attorneys and public defenders both win the vast majority of their clients' cases. Privately retained attorneys and public defenders have very similar success rates.

Which of the following is a criticism of public defenders and public defender programs quizlet?

Which of the following is a criticism of public defenders and public defender programs? Because they typically have huge caseloads, they may use plea bargaining excessively.

Is that act of providing money property or favors to someone in business or government in order to obtain a business advantage?

Bribery is offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting any item of value to improperly influence the actions of a person in order to obtain or retain business or an unfair advantage in the conduct of business; or to induce or reward improper conduct. "Kickback" is another term for bribery.

Why do lawyers have a duty of confidentiality?

The duty of confidentiality prevents lawyers from even informally discussing information related to their clients' cases with others.

What is privileged attorney?

The attorney-client privilege is a rule that preserves the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and clients. Under that rule, attorneys may not divulge their clients' secrets, nor may others force them to. The purpose of the privilege is to encourage clients ...

Is attorney client privilege inadmissible?

If someone were to surreptitiously record the conversation, that recording would probably be inadmissible in court.

Can a client forfeit the attorney-client privilege?

No matter who hears or learns about a communication, however, the lawyer typically remains obligated not to repeat it.

Can a lawyer disclose previous acts?

If, for example, if a client tells his lawyer that he robbed a bank or lied about assets during a divorce, the lawyer probably can't disclose the information.

Can an attorney disclose client secrets?

Under that rule, attorneys may not divulge their clients' secrets, nor may others force them to. The purpose of the privilege is to encourage clients to openly share information with their lawyers and to let lawyers provide effective representation.

What makes an attorney valuable?

The very factors that make attorneys’ services valuable – their knowledge of the law and the specialized training that leads their clients to place trust in them – lead to special scrutiny of attorneys’ payment relationships. The attorney-client relationship is a fiduciary relationship and, just as in other fiduciary relationship, the attorney’s dealings with the beneficiary – the client – are subject to special legal scrutiny. As one Illinois court has put it: The law places special obligations upon an attorney by virtue of the relationship between attorney and client. Those obligations are summed up and referred to generally as the fiduciary duty of the attorney. They permeate all phases of the relationship, including the contract for payment.

What is the rule for a lawyer to accept a referral fee?

Although many While the “joint responsibility” provision may allow a lawyer to accept a “referral fee” even if the lawyer performs no work, such fees come at a cost. As a comment to the rule notes, “joint responsibility ” means financial and ethical responsibility for the representation as if the lawyers were associated in a partnership.” Rule 1.5, Cmt. 7. That means that, if the lawyer accepts the fee, the lawyer may also be jointly responsible

Why do attorneys use retainers?

Attorneys commonly use retainers to secure payment of their legal fees and costs. The word “retainer,” however, has a variety of different meanings – and those different meanings result in different application of the relevant ethical rules.

What are the ABA model rules of professional conduct?

At their outset, the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (referenced herein throughout as the “Model Rules” or, individual, the “Rule”) require lawyers to serve their clients with competence (Rule 1.1), diligence (Rule 1.3) and loyalty – requiring them to avoid, or at least disclose, ways in which the attorney’s interests may conflict with those of the client. See, generally, Model Rules 1.6-1.8. The attorney-client relationship is also commercial, with the attorney typically entitled to demand payment from the client for services rendered. That commercial relationship inherently creates the potential for conflict. No matter how much the client may appreciate the attorney’s work, it would always be in the client’s best interests to avoid paying for it. Similarly, as much as the attorney may be motivated by genuine respect and admiration for the client, the attorney could always be paid more.

What is Rule 1.5?

Under Rule 1.5(a) a lawyer may not “make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee.” By its terms, the rule requires reasonableness to be assessed not only at the time the fee agreement is entered, but also when attorneys bill for services or attempt to collect the fees they are owed by the client. It is therefore possible to violate Rule 1.5 if an attorney seeks to enforce a fee agreement that, while reasonable at the time, was rendered unreasonable by subsequent events. For example, in In re Gerard, 132 Ill.2d 507, 548 N.E.2d 1051 (1989), a lawyer was found to have violated Rule 1.5 after charging a contingency fee based on the value of account assets located for an elderly client. While, at the time the lawyer had been hired, the client had believed accounts were being wrongfully withheld from him, in fact the accounts were not the subject of any adverse claim, but were turned over willingly by the banks holding them once they learned of the client’s whereabouts – requiring little in the way of attorney professional services. More generally, fees are frequently found to be unreasonable when the lawyer does not perform competent work, or neglects a matter, but nevertheless seeks to be paid the full fee for which he or she has contracted. See, e.g., Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Garrett, 427 Md. 209, 224, 46 A.3d 1169, 1178 (2012); Rose v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 425 S.W.3d 889, 891 (Ky. 2014).

What is the bar in law?

Bar – (1) Historically, the partition separating the general public from the space occupied by the judges, lawyers, and other participants in a trial. (2) More commonly, the body of lawyers within a jurisdiction.

What is a brief in a lawsuit?

Brief - A written statement prepared by one side in a lawsuit to explain to the court its view of the facts of a case and the applicable law. Burden of Proof - In the law of evidence, the necessity or duty of affirmatively proving a fact or facts in dispute on an issue raised between the parties in a lawsuit.

What is the difference between satisfaction and accord?

A way to discharge a claim whereby the parties agree to give and accept something in settlement of the claim that will replace the terms of the parties’ original agreement. Accord is the new agreement; satisfaction is performance of the new agreement.

What is an adjudication?

Adjudication - Judgment rendered by the court after a determination of the issues. Ad Litem - A Latin term meaning “for the purpose of the lawsuit.”. For example, a guardian “ad litem” is a person appointed by the court to protect the interests of a minor or legally incompetent person in a lawsuit.

What is an appeal in civil court?

Appeal - An application to a higher court for review of an order of conviction or of a civil judgment against a party.

What is an appeal bond?

Appeal Bond - A sum of money posted by a person appealing a judicial decision (appellant). Appearance – (1) The formal proceeding by which a defendant submits to the jurisdiction of the court. (2) A written notification to the plaintiff by an attorney stating that s/he is representing the defendant.

What is an arrest warrant?

Arrest Warrant – An order by a judge that gives permission for a police officer to arrest a person for allegedly committing a crime. Assault - Threat to inflict injury with an apparent ability to do so. Also, any intentional display of force that would give the victim reason to fear or expect immediate bodily harm.