which of the following is not a valid reason for an attorney to withdraw from a case? quizlet

by Mr. Davion Bode 10 min read

What can a lawyer not do in a civil case?

Dec 20, 2020 · 2 / 2 points Which of the following is not a valid reason for an attorney to withdraw from a case? Select one. Question options: The attorney is discharged by the client. The attorney’s schedule makes it difficult to attend to the details of the case. The legal action is for harassment or malicious purposes.

Which legal action will result in violation of a disciplinary rule?

Which of the following is not a valid reason for an attorney to withdraw from a case? 1) if the legal action is for harassment or malicious purposes 2) if continued employment will result in violation of a disciplinary rule 3) if the attorney's schedule makes it difficult to attend to the details of the case 4) if discharged by the client

What happens if the Attorney’s schedule makes it difficult to attend?

Question 1 2 / 2 points Which of the following is not a valid reason for an attorney to withdraw from a case? Select one. The attorney is discharged by the client. The legal action is for harassment or malicious purposes. The attorney’s schedule makes it difficult to attend to the details of the case. Continued employment will result in violation of a disciplinary rule.

Can a lawyer be discharged for malicious purposes?

View CJ230 4-3 QUIZ Q4 - 2ND ATTEMPT.png from CJ 230 at Southern New Hampshire University. Question 4 2 / 2 points Which of the following is not a valid reason for an attorney to withdraw from a

Is it difficult for a lawyer to withdraw from representing a client quizlet?

It is difficult for a lawyer to withdraw from representing a client. Judges have discretion in appointing guardian ad litem or indigent cases to attorneys. Judges have discretion in appointing guardian ad litem or indigent cases to attorneys.

Which factors would be ethical for a prosecutor to consider in making charging decisions?

Which factors would be ethical for a prosecutor to consider in making charging decisions? The quality of the evidence; The ability to obtain a conviction; The severity of the crime.

Which of the following is not a decision that correctional officials have the discretion to make about an inmate?

Which of the following is not a decision that correctional officials have the discretion to make about an inmate? Deny an inmate medical treatment.

What is the most common charge against prosecutors?

According to the text, the most common charge leveled against prosecutors is: failure to disclose evidence.

What are the ethical obligations of a prosecutor?

The prosecutor should seek to protect the innocent and convict the guilty, consider the interests of victims and witnesses, and respect the constitutional and legal rights of all persons, including suspects and defendants.

Why do prosecutors sometimes choose not to prosecute criminal cases?

No likelihood of success. Prosecutors may decline to press charges because they think it unlikely that a conviction will result. No matter what the prosecutor's personal feelings about the case, the prosecutor needs legally admissible evidence sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

What are the four purposes of corrections?

Four different goals of corrections are commonly espoused: retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation.

Which of the following Supreme Court cases held that parole boards do not?

- In Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates​ (1979), the Court ruled that parole boards do not have to specify the evidence or reasoning used in deciding to deny​ parole, p. 319.

Which of the following is a reason for having a centralized probation authority?

Which of the following is a reason for having a centralized probation authority? Decentralized programs are often unprofessional and lag behind the times, It is able to train staff for a variety of roles, and it is able to implement broader programs with greater equality in supervision and services.

What is the most popular reason that cases get dismissed?

Common Grounds to File a Motion to Dismiss Your Criminal CaseNo probable cause. ... Illegal search. ... Lack of evidence. ... Lost evidence. ... Missing witnesses. ... Failing to state Miranda Rights.

What is it called when prosecutors elect not to prosecute?

Prosecutors are supposed to both enforce the law and "do justice." Doing justice means that a prosecutor occasionally decides not to prosecute a case (or files less severe charges) because the interests of justice require it, even if the facts of the case might support a conviction.

What is the role of the prosecutor quizlet?

A prosecutor is a lawyer. The legal representative of the people of a city, county or state. They have the authority to bring charges, dismiss charges and modify charges. The prosecution decides who,what when and how an individual will be charged.

What is the difference between a defendant and a defendant?

1) the defendant defends himself or herself. 2) the defendant is represented by one attorney only. 3) the defendant is provided an attorney free of charge. 4) the defendant is not able to stand trial. the defendant defends himself or herself. The vast majority of cases in the criminal justice system are settled by:

What is plea bargaining?

1) Plea bargaining is not accompanied by ethical concerns. 2) Plea bargains must be formally requested by the defense. 3) Plea bargaining occurs in the vast majority of criminal cases. 4) Plea bargains must be approved by the arresting officer and victim. Plea bargaining occurs in the vast majority of criminal cases.

What is shadow jury?

A shadow jury is a: 1) panel of people selected by the press that observes the trial and provides feedback to the press. 2) panel of people selected by the defense attorney that observes the trial and provides feedback to the attorney. 3) panel of people selected by the prosecutor ...

What is the Halo Effect?

The "halo effect" refers to: 1) the phenomenon in which a defendant is seen as innocent and naïve. 2) the phenomenon in which a person with expertise or status in one area is given deference in all areas. 3) the phenomenon in which the defense attorney is given deference even when he is clearly stretching the truth.