Jan 29, 2016 · On October 28, 2015, Bart M. Schwartz was approved to serve as the General Motors (“GM”) Monitor on behalf of the Department of Justice.
General Motors Litigation. On November 30, 2020, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division denied almost all Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' consolidated amended class action complaint alleging claims for economic losses under a variety of legal theories.
Nov 16, 2017 · UNITED STATES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION. No. 76. Argued Nov. 16, 17, 1944. ... In the spring of 1942 the Secretary of War requested the Attorney General to institute proceedings for condemnation of the occupancy of the remaining space for a term ending June 30, 1943. Pursuant to the request, the United States, June 8, 1942, filed a petition ...
Sep 17, 2015 · Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said: “For nearly two years, GM failed to disclose a deadly safety defect to the public and its regulator. By doing so, GM put its customers and the driving public at serious risk.
Hagens Berman, a consumer-rights law firm that took a leading role in the largest automotive lawsuit in history, represents owners of GM-branded vehicles in a national class-action lawsuit seeking compensation, statutory penalties and punitive damages against GM on behalf of owners of millions of vehicles affected by ...
If you own a GM car that has been recalled or suffered an injury because a recalled part malfunctioned, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
General Motors is facing a class-action lawsuit because of the paint on Chevrolet and GMC's line of full-size trucks and SUVs from the model years 2015 through 2019. The complainants claim that the clear coat and paint were defective from the factory.Mar 15, 2022
The $120 million settlement, approved in December 2020, encompasses about 100 class actions for economic loss involving millions of recalled vehicles.Jun 1, 2021
How do I Send a Formal Complaint to General Motors?Write out a formal complaint on word-processing software. This can be done with any software such as Corel Wordperfect, Microsoft Word or Microsoft Works. ... Send the complaint Priority Mail to the following address: GM P.O. Box 33170 Detroit, MI 48232-5170.
General Motors complaints contactsVisit GM Customer Care Contact Form.Call GM Headquarters on (313) 556-5000.Tweet General Motors Customer Care.Tweet General Motors.
General Motors alleges that the “Chevy Shake” is caused by 8-speed transmissions. The 8L45 and 8L90 transmissions allegedly cause significant shaking and shuddering in some SUVs and trucks. Sometimes, the shaking is so violent that drivers feel like they have been hit by other vehicles.
The eight-speed transmission is said to have issues with the hydraulic system, which puts stress on the gears and wears them down. This then causes metal shavings to become trapped inside the transmission, which subsequently causes the component to malfunction.Apr 6, 2021
The bottom line on GM lifter problems So, far GM has not issued any national recalls. Luckily, it seems that the lifters problem does have a fix that is working. “When we can get the parts, it's a relatively quick repair and it's a one-and-done fix,” the anonymous dealership technician said.Dec 20, 2021
General Motors ignition recall lawyer Millions of General Motors vehicles are being recalled because of a defect found in the vehicles' engine and electrical components that can cause the cars to shut off. The ignition switch defect is found in Chevrolet, Pontiac, Saturn, Buick, and GMC models.
"Recall 14v400 Vehicles,” which are 1997-2003 Chevrolet Malibu vehicles, 2000-2005 Chevrolet Impala vehicles, 2000-2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vehicles, 2004-2005 Chevrolet Classic vehicles, 1999-2004 Oldsmobile Alero vehicles, 1998-2002 Oldsmobile Intrigue vehicles, 1999-2005 Pontiac Grand Am vehicles, and 2004-2008 ...
On September 26, 2019, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division appointed Theodore J. Leopold, as Lead Counsel and Plaintiff Steering Committee Chair to consolidate and oversee the putative consumer class actions against General Motors (“GM”) before the court.
Plaintiffs allege that vehicles manufactured by GM between 2015-2018 equipped with one of two models of eight-speed automatic transmissions – the GM 8L90 or the 8L45 – have a common defect. Plaintiffs claim that while attempting to accelerate or decelerate their cars feel a hesitation, followed by a significant shake, shudder, jerk, clunk, or “hard shift” when the vehicle’s automatic transmission changes gears, as well as when the subject vehicles are accelerated in a single gear, and not actively shifting gears.
Hagens Berman , a consumer-rights law firm that took a leading role in the largest automotive lawsuit in history, represents owners of GM-branded vehicles in a national class-action lawsuit seeking compensation, statutory penalties and punitive damages against GM on behalf of owners of millions of vehicles affected by safety defects and recalls.
The court’s decision allows the cases to continue for plaintiffs represented by Hagens Berman. Hagens Berman files fourth amended complaint against General Motors on behalf of hundreds of owners.
The suit seeks to award affected consumers the greater of actual or statutory damages under consumer-protection laws, along with other damages for owners of vehicles with ignition switch safety defects and punitive damages.
Today, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York issued an extensive 108-page order allowing claims to move forward for GM owners. The ruling found that manifestation of the defect is not required in order to bring statutory consumer protection, common-law fraud, and implied warranty claims, and addressed the application of prior motion to dismiss opinions on the issues of unjust enrichment and incidental damages.
Hagens Berman is one of the most successful auto litigation law firms in the U.S. and is presently leading nationwide cases against Volkswagen, GM, Mercedes and Fiat Chrysler for use of diesel emissions-cheating software.
Reports published in 2005 state that GM issued a service bulletin for some GM vehicles, telling dealers to warn drivers to remove “unnecessary items from their key chains,” a warning that was extended a year later to a broader range of GM vehicles.
GM failed to alert consumers of the known risks they faced driving the vehicles, despite promising it would honor the federal reporting requirement of safety risks for all General Motors cars including assets purchased from the 2009 bankruptcy.
Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch said: “Every consumer has the right to expect that car manufacturers are taking their safety seriously. The Department of Justice is committed to ensuring that the products Americans buy are safe; that consumers are protected from harm; and that auto companies follow the law.”.
FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Diego Rodriguez said: “GM concealed a safety defect from consumers and regulators, which put drivers at risk. The resolution of this case shows that safety should never take a backseat to expediency.”.
By doing so, GM put its customers and the driving public at serious risk. Justice requires the filing of criminal charges, detailed admissions, a significant financial penalty, and the appointment of a federal monitor. These measures are designed to make sure that this never happens again.”.
Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said: “General Motors not only failed to disclose this deadly defect, but as the Department of Justice investigation shows, it actively concealed the truth from NHTSA and the public.
Instead, public knowledge came about because Lance Cooper, a Marietta, Georgia attorney who sued GM on behalf of the family of a woman who had died in a crash, obtained thousands of pages of documents from GM and took the depositions of several GM engineers.
On April 8, the NHTSA fined GM $28,000, because the company hadn't supplied the agency with the information it had requested it give them by April 3, and the agency charged them $7,000 for each day after then that GM didn't provide this information . On May 16, GM agreed to pay the Department of Transportation the maximum fine of $35 million for delaying the recall of the defective cars they recalled earlier in 2014.
On February 6, 2014, General Motors (GM) recalled about 800,000 of its small cars due to faulty ignition switches, which could shut off the engine while the vehicle was in motion and thereby prevent the airbags from inflating. The company continued to recall more of its cars over the next several months, resulting in nearly 30 million cars recalled ...
The faulty ignition switches have been linked to 124 deaths by GM. Originally, they only linked the failures to 13 deaths and 31 crashes. The company only counted incidents resulting in head-on collisions in which the airbags did not deploy. It did not include, for example, an incident where after a car's ignition switch failed, the car "spun out, hydroplaned, hit an oncoming vehicle and rolled off the road, dropping 15 feet into a creek". In a collision in which two young women in a Chevrolet Cobalt were killed when the ignition switch shut off the engine, GM only counted the death of the woman in the front seat, because the death of the woman in the back seat was not caused by the failure of the airbag to deploy. Most of the victims were under age 25. On June 3, 2014, Reuters published an analysis concluding that the faulty switches were responsible for 74 deaths, based on Fatality Analysis Reporting System data. General Motors disputed its conclusion, and stood by their original figure of 13 deaths after the report was released as of June 3, 2014. By the end of September, Reuters stated in an article that 153 deaths were linked to the faulty ignition switch. As of March 2015, GM had offered compensation for 11 Category One injuries, along with 115 Category Two injuries. In April 2015, GM officially noted that the death toll was believed to have reached 87, higher than the previous number of 74 they reported in March 2015. Upon its completion, the compensation fund established by GM had offered compensation for 124 deaths, nearly 10 times more than the 13 deaths GM executives reported in April 2014. However, the true number of deaths resulting from the ignition switch is likely higher, as GM's compensation fund rejected more than 90% of claims and it did not include claims that are part of the ongoing Multidistrict Litigation.
GM said the parts needed to repair the faulty ignition switches were expected to become available on April 7, 2014. However, that same day, CNN Money contacted six dealerships, none of whom had received these parts. A spokesman for GM, Alan Adler, said that he didn't know how many replacement parts had been shipped to dealerships, or when the majority of parts would be available.
As of March 2015, GM had offered compensation for 11 Category One injuries, along with 115 Category Two injuries. In April 2015, GM officially noted that the death toll was believed to have reached 87, higher than the previous number of 74 they reported in March 2015.
The first recall was announced on February 7, 2014, and involved about 800,000 Chevrolet Cobalts and Pontiac G5s. On March 31, GM announced it was going to recall over 1.5 million more cars of six different models, due to faulty power steering. Of these, over 1.3 million were in the United States, and three of the models were also involved in ...
Thomas J. Henry is representing more than 1,000 GM recall victims across the United States and has been investigating injuries and deaths linked to the recall since day one. The firm launched a nationwide media investigation into the recall in April, which brought forth thousands of affected individuals who had information critical to the investigation – information that the firm has handed over to federal agencies also investigating GM’s sluggish response the recall. As more and more individuals have flocked to Thomas J. Henry for representation, the firm has continued to push GM for a victim settlement fund. The firm has had several talks with GM’s victim compensation expert Ken Feinberg regarding appropriate victim compensation for the thousands affected by a fatal design flaw in ignition switches which left numerous dead and countless others seriously injured.
In June, GM released details of a GM fund that would be used to compensate victims who were injured or killed in accidents involving 2.6 million with defective ignition switches. However, the plaintiffs in the recently filed suit aren’t eligible for that plan because their vehicle was part of a later ignition switch recall and not the earlier one.
The lawsuit, which was filed by attorney Robert Hilliard, includes over 600 plaintiffs, including the families of 29 people killed in crashes involving faulty ignition switches.