when the opposing attorney asks questions of a witness, she is engaging in reexamination.

When does the opposing attorney engage in reexamination of a witness?

Anderson's attorney calls Li's doctor to the witness stand. ____ place. Direct examination. When the opposing attorney asks questions of a witness, she is engaging in reexamination. a. True b. False ... False. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, the defendant's attorney may ask for a __1__. After the defendant's attorney is finished ...

What happens at the conclusion of the plaintiff's case?

When the opposing attorney asks questions of a witness, she is engaging in reexamination. false. 6. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, the defendant's attorney may ask for _____ a motion for a judgment as a matter of law . 7. After the defendant's attorney is finished introducing evidence, the plaintiff's attorney can present a ...

What happens after the defendant's attorney is finished introducing evidence?

When the opposing attorney asks questions of a witness, she is engaging in reexamination. T/F? Answer: False. ... At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, the defendant's attorney may ask for a _____ . Answer: motion for a judgment as a matter of law. Answer : motion for a judgment as a matter of law ... When the attorneys did not ask enough ...

When can the defendant's attorney present a rebuttal?

When the opposing attorney asks questions of a witness, she is engaging in reexamination. Answer: false. Answer : false. 21.) At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, the defendant's attorney may ask for a closing argument . After the defendant's attorney is finished introducing evidence, the plaintiff's attorney can present a rebuttal ...

Why Do Witnesses Try to Outsmart Opposing Counsel?

First, let’s focus on Tim. Why did he choose to do this? Wouldn’t it have been simpler to answer questions directly, and without obvious contempt for opposing counsel? No, not for Tim; he was so offended the litigation was happening in the first place that his indignation overcame his good judgement, and he lashed out at opposing counsel.

How Can This Behavior Be Fixed?

If you’ve got a witness who might want to outsmart opposing counsel, the most important task will be to uncover the motivation behind his or her testimony.

Conclusion

While there are no silver bullets for preparing challenging witnesses, understanding the goals and fears that lead to these behaviors is the first step to correcting the problem. Listen to your witnesses for possible red flags and try to address their concerns.