when must the government provide a criminal defendant with an attorney?

Full Answer

What must the government provide to the defendant at trial?

At the defendant's request, the government must give to the defendant a written summary of any testimony that the government intends to use under Rules 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence during its case-in-chief at trial.

When does the government have to provide a defendant with information?

Upon a defendant's request, the government must furnish the defendant with a copy of the defendant's prior criminal record that is within the government's possession, custody, or control if the attorney for the government knows—or through due diligence could know—that the record exists. (E) Documents and Objects.

What is a government-appointed criminal defense attorney?

Defendants who can't afford to hire an attorney have the right to a government-appointed attorney to represent them at public (taxpayer) expense. This article provides an overview of the ins and outs of court-appointed criminal defense attorneys: Who gets one?

What are the rights of a criminal defense attorney?

The Right to a Criminal Defense Attorney. The right to representation by counsel in a criminal proceeding is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The government does not always go to great lengths to fulfill its duty to make counsel available to defendants who cannot afford an attorney.

At what point in a criminal proceeding should an accused have a right to counsel Why?

As a general matter people are entitled to counsel from the time of arraignment until the end of a trial. The right begins before the trial itself because courts have acknowledged that early events are critical to the criminal proceeding as a whole.

In which case did the Supreme Court determine the requirements which must be met if defendants are to receive effective counsel?

The Supreme Court held in Strickland v. Washington that the proper standard for constitutional assistance of counsel is that attorney performance must be objectively reasonable given the totality of circumstances.

How does the criminal justice system provide for the right to an attorney?

The right to counsel refers to the right of a criminal defendant to have a lawyer assist in his defense, even if he cannot afford to pay for an attorney. The Sixth Amendment gives defendants the right to counsel in federal prosecutions.

When did the criminal defendants in state courts gain the right to counsel?

When the Supreme Court first recognized a constitutional right to counsel in 1963 in its landmark ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright, the justices did not require states to provide any particular remedy or procedure to guarantee that indigent defendants could fully exercise that right.

Under what circumstances does a defendant have a constitutional right to choose a different court assigned attorney?

According to the Supreme Court, under what circumstances does a defendant have a Constitutional right to choose a different privately hired attorney? Defendant can choose a new attorney for almost any reason. "Very distrustful" of their lawyers.

What criteria are used to determine whether a defendant has been denied adequate representation by counsel under the Sixth Amendment?

Proving the Right to Adequate Representation Was Violated In order to prove this, the defendant must show: Their lawyer's job performance was deficient (i.e. the lawyer made errors so serious that they didn't function as the counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment); and.

At which stage of the criminal justice process does the right to counsel not apply?

Ed. 2d 694 [1966]). Defendants do not enjoy a Sixth Amendment right to be represented by counsel during every phase of litigation that follows the initiation of formal adversarial proceedings by the state. Instead, defendants may only assert this right during "critical stages" of the proceedings (Maine v.

Does everyone have the right to a lawyer?

Everyone is not entitled to representation. The US Constitution only provides for a right to an attorney in criminal cases. Legal Aid handles only civil matters. Before a case is accepted the case must be determined to have legal merit and meet Legal Aid priorities.

What does the right to counsel legal representation entail in criminal law and procedure?

The Constitution grants an accused the right to be defended by a legal counsel of his own choice, before a court of law, in addition to the fundamental right of consulting one whilst in police custody and any refusal of the police in not allowing the accused to meet his counsel or relatives is unjustified and in ...

When in the criminal process does the right to counsel begin quizlet?

when in the criminal process does the right to counsel begin and end? - the right begins from the time they first appear before a judge until sentence is pronounced and the first appeal concluded. Indigents have the right to court-appointed counsel only for the first appeal.

In which of the following cases did the court hold that an accused has a right to represent him her self?

The case that established that defendants have a right to represent themselves was Faretta v. California, U.S. Sup. Ct. 1975. The Faretta case said that a judge must allow self-representation if a defendant is competent to understand and participate in the court proceedings.

Which of the following cases sets a precedent that accused people have the right to counsel even if they Cannot afford it?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own.

What is the right of a defendant to choose his or her own attorney?

The U.S. Supreme Court has gradually recognized a defendant’s right to counsel of his or her own choosing. A court may deny a defendant’s choice of attorney in certain situations, however, such as if the court concludes that the attorney has a significant conflict of interest. Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153 (1988). The Supreme Court has held that a defendant does not have a right to a “meaningful relationship” with his or her attorney, in a decision holding that a defendant could not delay trial until a specific public defender was available. Morris v. Slappy, 461 U.S. 1, 14 (1983).

What is the right to represent yourself in a criminal trial?

Right of Self-Representation. Defendants have the right to represent themselves, known as appearing pro se , in a criminal trial. A court has the obligation to determine whether the defendant fully understands the risks of waiving the right to counsel and is doing so voluntarily.

What is the right to representation in a criminal case?

The right to representation by counsel in a criminal proceeding is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The government does not always go to great lengths to fulfill its duty to make counsel available to defendants who cannot afford an attorney. In general, however, defendants still have the right to counsel ...

What is the meaning of "deprivation of a defendant's right to counsel"?

Deprivation of a defendant’s right to counsel, or denial of a choice of attorney without good cause , should result in the reversal of the defendant’s conviction, according to the U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140 (2006).

Which amendment was applied to the states in Gideon v. Wainwright?

The U.S. Supreme Court finally applied the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), although the decision only applied to felony cases.

Which amendment states that the accused shall have the right to counsel?

Sixth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “ [i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.”. This has applied in federal prosecutions for most of the nation’s history.

Does the right to counsel extend to defendants?

The right to counsel of choice does not extend to defendants who require public defenders. Individuals have the right to representation by an attorney once a criminal case against them has commenced, and the Supreme Court has also recognized the right to counsel during certain preliminary proceedings.

Which amendment states that a defendant can have counsel appointed at the government's expense?

In Johnson v. Zerbst, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that in federal court trials, the Sixth Amendment right to assistance of counsel includes the right to have counsel appointed at the government’s expense if a defendant cannot afford to pay for one. Four years later, however, in Betts v. Brady, the court will refuse to extend the same rule to state court trials.

Which amendments guarantee indigent defendants the right to have an attorney appointed?

Zerbst: The Sixth and 14th Amendments guarantee indigent defendants the right to have an attorney appointed, at the government’s expense, if they are charged with a serious crime. In 1972, in Argersinger v. Hamlin, the Court will extend the Gideon rule to defendants charged with a misdemeanor and facing jail time.

What amendment is violated in Massiah v. United States?

1964 Counsel Must Be At Questioning After Suspect Charged. In Massiah v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Sixth Amendment is violated when a defendant, having been charged and awaiting trial, is interrogated by police officers without the presence of a defense attorney.

What is the case of Anders v. California?

California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that counsel appointed to represent a criminal defendant must “support his client’s appeal to the best of his ability.” The Court finds that this constitutional obligation was violated when the defense counsel appointed to represent the defendant on appeal simply submitted a letter to the court expressing his opinion that the appeal had no merit, and withdrew from the case. The Court rules that the defense attorney has a duty to fully investigate the case’s merits and fully justify his reasons for refusing to file an appeal. In addition, the defendant should have an opportunity to rebut the attorney’s arguments, and the appeals court should have the leeway to reject the attorney’s arguments, to permit the appeal, and to appoint new counsel.

Why did the court deny the teens their 6th amendment rights?

The court finds that the teens were denied their Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel because they had not seen an attorney until the morning of the trial and had no chance to put on a meaningful defense.

What is the Fifth Amendment in Miranda v. Arizona?

In Miranda v. Arizona, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination is not limited to in-court testimony, but also applies when a person is taken into police custody for questioning. The Court also rules that criminal suspects must be told of their Sixth Amendment right to an attorney. Once a person “indicates in any manner that he does not wish to be interrogated,” the police must stop asking questions – even if the person has answered questions up to that point, the Court says.

When does the Sixth Amendment apply?

Supreme Court rules that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies not only when police formally interrogate suspects but also when they casually speak with the defendant and intentionally discuss topics that they know are likely to provoke the defendant to make incriminating statements.

What are the rights of a defendant?

Under United States law, all defendants have important rights, including: 1 The right against unreasonable searches and seizures 2 The right to remain silent 3 The right to reasonable bail 4 The right against double jeopardy 5 The right to a speedy trial 6 The right to a jury trial (in most cases) 7 The right to examine witnesses 8 The right against cruel and unusual punishment 9 The right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty

Why do defense attorneys work?

They work to ensure that courts do not wrongfully convict defendants or impose excessive sentences for convictions. However, an attorney does a lot before the case ends.

What is the goal of a prosecutor?

The prosecutor’s goal is to enforce the laws by convicting offenders and ensuring they are sentenced to certain penalties. The judge is supposed to serve as a neutral decision-maker. The defense attorney is the individual who protects the rights of the defendant. Under United States law, all defendants have important rights, including:

What is a plea bargain?

Discussing the possibility of a plea bargain with the prosecutor, which may involve agreeing to plead guilty to lesser charges or to receive a lesser sentence. Helping you decide whether to plead guilty or take your case to trial. Representing you at a jury trial.

What is the right to the presumption of innocence?

The right against cruel and unusual punishment. The right to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. One of a defendant’s most important rights is that to legal representation under the Sixth Amendment.

What court did the defendants appeal to?

Both defendants appealed to the California District Court of Appeal . This first appeal was granted as a matter of right to all criminal defendants. Under California law, however, indigent defendants did not have the right to an appointed attorney for the first appeal.

What is the right to counsel?

According to the Court, the right to counsel is "one of the safeguards …deemed necessary to insure fundamental HUMAN RIGHTS of life and liberty.". In making this decision, the Court noted "the obvious truth that the average defendant does not have the professional legal skill to protect himself.".

What did the Framers consider the deprivation of counsel?

The Framers of the U.S. Constitution considered the deprivation of counsel repugnant to basic principles of criminal justice. According to the Framers, the assistance of counsel was a critical element in maintaining an accusatorial system of justice.

Who represented Gideon in the Supreme Court?

On appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, Gideon was represented by ABE FORTAS, who had been appointed by the Court. Through Fortas, Gideon argued that the right to counsel was a fundamental right and essential to a fair trial.

Can police interrogate someone who has been indicted?

The Court agreed and reversed Massiah's conviction. The Court in Massiah established that the police may not interrogate someone who has been indicted unless the person's attorney is present or the person has knowingly waived the right to have counsel present.

Can you appeal a case as a matter of right?

All states do allow one appeal as a matter of right. For discretionary appeals, or appeals that are not granted as a matter of right—such as appeals to the state's highest court in states with a lower reviewing court, and appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court—there is no right to counsel.

Is the appointment of an attorney in a capital case a violation of the defendant's due process rights?

According to the Court, the trial court's appointment of an unprepared attorney in a capital case is a violation of the defendant's DUE PROCESS rights. The Powell decision did not mandate the appointment of an attorney for all impoverished defendants.

What is the rule of discovery in criminal law?

Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regulates discovery by the defendant of evidence in possession of the prosecution, and discovery by the prosecution of evidence in possession of the defendant. The present rule permits the defendant to move the court to discover certain material.

What is the amendment to Rule 16(b)(1)(C)?

The amendment to Rule 16 (b) (1) (C) provides that if the defendant has notified the government under Rule 12.2 of an intent to rely on expert testimony to show the defendant's mental condition, the government may request the defense to disclose information about its expert witnesses.

What is the present rule of discovery?

The present rule permits the defendant to move the court to discover certain material. The prosecutor's discovery is limited and is reciprocal—that is, if the defendant is granted discovery of certain items, then the prosecution may move for discovery of similar items under the defendant's control.

What is the defense entitled to?

Under Rule 16 (a) (1) (E), as amended in 1993, the defense is entitled to disclosure of certain information about expert witnesses which the government intends to call during the trial. And if the government provides that information, it is entitled to reciprocal discovery under (b) (1) (C).

What is paragraph 16(a)(2) amended to clarify?

Paragraph (a) (2) is amended to clarify that the 2002 restyling of Rule 16 did not change the protection afforded to government work product. Prior to restyling in 2002, Rule 16 (a) (1) (C) required the government to allow the defendant to inspect and copy "books, papers, [and] documents" material to his defense.

What does Rule 16(b) mean?

Except for scientific or medical reports, Rule 16 (b) (1) does not authorize discovery or inspection of: (A) reports, memoranda, or other documents made by the defendant, or the defendant's attorney or agent, during the case's investigation or defense; or.

When does the government disclose oral statements?

Upon a defendant's request, the government must disclose to the defendant the substance of any relevant oral statement made by the defendant, before or after arrest, in response to interrogation by a person the defendant knew was a government agent if the government intends to use the statement at trial.

When should a prosecutor consider potential discovery obligations?

Prosecutors should begin considering potential discovery obligations early in an investigation that has national security implications and should also carefully evaluate their discovery obligations prior to filing charges.

What are the discovery obligations of a prosecutor?

Discovery obligations are continuing, and prosecutors should always be alert to developments occurring up to and through trial of the case that may impact their discovery obligations and require disclosure of information that was previously not disclosed.

What are the rules of professional conduct?

Rules of Professional Conduct in most jurisdictions also impose ethical obligations on prosecutors regarding discovery in criminal cases. Prosecutors are also reminded to contact the Professional Responsibility Advisory Office when they have questions about those or any other ethical responsibilities.

Why is compliance with discovery obligations important?

First and foremost, however, such compliance will facilitate a fair and just result in every case , which is the Department's singular goal in pursuing a criminal prosecution.

Is the guidance subject to law?

The guidance is subject to legal precedent, court orders, and local rules. It provides prospective guidance only and is not intended to have the force of law or to create or confer any rights, privileges, or benefits. See United States v. Caceres, 440 US. 741 (1979).

What are the duties of an attorney?

The government does, however, have a constitutional duty to appoint attorneys for people (adults and juveniles) charged with misdemeanor and felony crimes if they are: 1 legally indigent (see below), and 2 facing a potential jail or prison sentence.

What to do if you can't afford a criminal defense lawyer?

If you don't think you can afford to pay for a criminal defense lawyer, you should ask the court to appoint one for you. You will need to provide information about your income, assets, and expenses. If you qualify, the court will appoint a public defender or panel attorney for you.

What is public defender?

Public defenders are court-appointed attorneys (more on that below). In a series of decisions in the 1960s and 1970s, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that all criminal defendants facing the threat of incarceration (jail or prison) have a right to be represented by an attorney. Defendants who can't afford to hire an attorney have ...

What is conflict in law?

Conflicts arise when an attorney's ability to zealously represent a defendant could be impaired by their past or present ethical duties to another client ( such as a co-defendant). In these cases, judges appoint the public defender to represent one defendant and a panel attorney for the other (s).

What does "indigent" mean in Florida?

Florida defines "indigent" as a "person who is unable to pay for the services of an attorney, including costs of investigation, without substantial hardship to the person or the person's family.". (Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.111.)

Which amendment guarantees the right to counsel?

The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the "assistance of counsel.". Lawmakers and courts use the terms counsel, lawyer, and attorney interchangeably, and you've undoubtedly heard the term public defender. Public defenders are court-appointed attorneys (more on that below).

Do people get free lawyers for speeding tickets?

People hauled into court for minor traffic infractions ( like speeding tickets) don't get free lawyers either. The government does, however, have a constitutional duty to appoint attorneys for people (adults and juveniles) charged with misdemeanor and felony crimes if they are: legally indigent (see below), and.

The Right to A Criminal Defense Attorney

Sixth Amendment

• The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” This has applied in federal prosecutions for most of the nation’s history. Many states, however, did not always provide this protection to defendants. Indiana was somet...

See more on justia.com

Choice of Attorney

Public Defender

Denial of Right to Counsel

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Right of Self-Representation

Right to Counsel in Immigration Proceedings