when does attorney forfeit fees negotiation

by Roderick Kunze 8 min read

Therefore, the guidelines suggest that when fee information is needed only for forfeiture, then the prosecutor should wait until after the trial. (Section 9-120.115) This view, however, doesn’t take into account how a representation works in reality. A representation doesn’t usually end the day a trial ends.

Full Answer

Can I negotiate my lawyer’s fees?

For example, you can negotiate that the attorney only takes a 25% fee if your settlement is 10,000 or less but if the settlement is greater than 10,000, the lawyer will get a 33% fee. These negotiations can unfold in many different ways.

When to pursue forfeiture of an asset transferred to an attorney?

Forfeiture of an asset transferred to an attorney as fees for legal services may be pursued where there are reasonable grounds to believe the transfer was a fraudulent or sham transaction designed to shield from forfeiture assets which otherwise are forfeitable.

Can a lawyer stop representing a client after a fee dispute?

Lawyers do not have an automatic right to stop representing a client in the event of a fee dispute.

What happens if a lawyer refuses to pay a fee?

For lawyers, however, the stakes are much higher. A lawyer’s professional judgment is at issue in every fee dispute case. Failure to collect a large legal fee can endanger the lawyer’s standing in his firm and within the larger legal or client community.

image

Can I negotiate with a lawyer?

If you're prepared, though, your experience with a lawyer doesn't have to be painful. In fact, negotiating with your lawyer before they start work—and discussing the small details that can add up to a big bill—can lay the groundwork for a trusting, mutually beneficial relationship.

What should you not say to a lawyer?

Five things not to say to a lawyer (if you want them to take you..."The Judge is biased against me" Is it possible that the Judge is "biased" against you? ... "Everyone is out to get me" ... "It's the principle that counts" ... "I don't have the money to pay you" ... Waiting until after the fact.

Does losing party pay legal fees USA?

In the United States, the rule (called the American Rule) is that each party pays only their own attorneys' fees, regardless of whether they win or lose.

What percentage do most lawyers take as a contingency fee?

33 ⅓ percentWhile the percentage of the fee varies by lawyer, typically contingency fees are 33 ⅓ percent of the case if a lawsuit is not filed and 40% if a lawsuit is filed.

What is the most common complaint against lawyers?

Perhaps the most common kinds of complaints against lawyers involve delay or neglect. This doesn't mean that occasionally you've had to wait for a phone call to be returned. It means there has been a pattern of the lawyer's failing to respond or to take action over a period of months.

How often should I hear from my attorney?

There is no set formula for how often you will hear from your attorney. However, the key to a successful attorney client relationship is communication. Whenever there is an important occurrence in your case you will be contacted or notified.

What happens if a lawyer loses a case?

If the attorney loses the case, the client is still responsible for legal fees as stipulated in the original retainer contract. Some attorneys may agree to withhold billing until the end of a case, but they will still expect payment regardless of how the case ends.

How much can you sue for emotional distress?

Emotional distress can often qualify for both special and general damages. Because of this, pain and suffering compensation usually amounts to 2 to 5 times the total costs of medical bills (therapies, medications, etc.) and lost wages from missed work. This amount can vary significantly on a case-by-case basis.

How do you know if your lawyer is selling you out?

Unprofessional or unethical behavior can include:Arriving late or failing to show up for important meetings, or missing court dates.Making decisions of importance about your case without discussing it with you first.Missing filing deadlines, filing paperwork incorrectly or filing the wrong paperwork with the court.More items...•

How do lawyers negotiate settlements?

The negotiation process typically starts with your lawyer providing a written proposal for settlement to the insurance adjuster or the defendant's lawyer. The adjuster or lawyer will respond to your lawyer either in writing or over the phone.

What is a 20% contingency?

Phase Contingency This contingency is normally calculated as a percentage. If the phase is 100 days of effort, contingency at 20% would be another 20 days. As the project progresses, the level of risk reduces as the requirements and issues become known, so the percentage will be reduced.

Why are contingency fees Controversial?

Additionally, the rules of professional ethics prohibit attorneys from working on contingency in family law or criminal law cases, because this would appear to condone or even encourage divorce or criminal activity.

What is the purpose of forfeiture laws?

Federal forfeiture laws are premised on the notion that tainted assets belong to the government as of the date of the underlying offense. In order to protect attorney fees against government forfeiture, an attorney must be able to establish that they are in fact “a bona fide purchaser”.

Does a defendant have a right to transfer an asset to their attorney?

Generally, precedent in the context of forfeiture has held that while a defendant has a constitutionally-protected right to an attorney and an attorney of course has a right to be compensated for their services, a defendant does not necessarily have a right to transfer an asset to their attorney as payment when the asset may be subject to forfeiture by the government.

How to negotiate cost cutting?

For example, you can negotiate the intervals at which an attorney bills, specify that certain aspects of the case be handled for a fixed fee rather than an hourly rate, and you can limit the number of hours that an attorney can work on your case.

What is the difference between an hourly and flat fee?

Generally, a flat or fixed fee is charged for routine legal work, such as drafting a simple will. Criminal lawyers may also charge flat fees for routine cases (e.g., expungements). You will see flat fees for criminal cases because it is often hard to get paid once a client goes to jail. With an hourly rate, an attorney charges you for every hour or portion of an hour that the attorney or other staff members work on the case. Attorneys who handle divorce cases may charge an hourly rate.

What is a second cost saving technique?

A second cost saving technique is to negotiate certain fees at a fixed rate and others at an hourly rate. For example, if you are going through a divorce your attorney may handle the divorce on an hourly rate but draft your new will at a fixed rate.

What to discuss with an attorney?

When you meet with an attorney, you should discuss the attorney’s fees and be prepared to negotiate the terms of the fee structure. Whether the attorney bills his or her fees as a flat rate, hourly, or an a contingent fee basis, there is usually room to reduce the fee and save yourself money. However, some good attorneys may not be willing ...

How to choose an attorney for a flat fee?

When choosing an attorney to represent you in a routine legal case for a fixed fee, it is important that you contact other attorneys in the area and identify the rate that they charge for the same legal work. By identifying the acceptable fee range for legal services, you are in a better position to negotiate a reduced fee from an attorney that charges more than his or her competitors .

What is contingent fee agreement?

Understand a contingent fee arrangement. In a contingent fee agreement, an attorney agrees to accept a fixed percentage of the amount recovered in your case. The percentage may be between 33% and 40% of the amount recovered. Typically, personal injury cases are handled on a contingent fee basis. In a contingent fee arrangement, you will also be responsible for paying the costs of the case from any recovery. However, if the lawyer loses you will not owe the lawyer any money for the time spent working on your case. Some of the costs related to a case may include:

Why do attorneys charge flat fees?

You will see flat fees for criminal cases because it is often hard to get paid once a client goes to jail. With an hourly rate, an attorney charges you for every hour or portion of an hour that the attorney or other staff members work on the case. Attorneys who handle divorce cases may charge an hourly rate.

How to negotiate fees with an attorney?

If you spoke on the phone with the attorney for 15 minutes, you’d be charged at the hourly rate for a 5-minute interval rather than a 15-minute interval. Another way you negotiate legal fees with your attorney is that you be charged with a flat fee for certain services and an hourly rate for others. For example, the attorney can complete court forms at a designated flat fee and charge you hourly to appear in court.

How to negotiate legal fees?

To negotiate legal fees with your attorney, compare a few attorneys’ hourly and flat fee rates, and ask what services are included in the costs. You can request a reasonable rate, and reach a fair payment plan and billing structure. Carefully read the retainer agreement before you sign it. Limited scope representation is also a great way to keep attorney costs low.

How to negotiate a contingency fee?

To negotiate a contingency fee agreement, first carefully read and compare contingency agreements from multiple attorneys. These fees are typically negotiable, so you can propose a lower contingency fee, discuss a reduced fee if the case is settled, or request a sliding scale. Make sure to ask how the attorney fees will be deducted.

What is contingency fee?

A contingency fee agreement is an agreement in which an attorney accepts a designated percentage of a client’s monetary recovery as a form of payment. If a client wins monetary compensation, the lawyer will receive a designated percentage of the client’s recovery. In contingency fee agreements, clients typically do not pay attorneys if their case is lost. The average contingency fee is 30-33% (one-third) of the final monetary recovery.

What is the difference between flat fee and hourly rate?

The difference between a flat fee and hourly rate is the way the attorney bills their client. A flat fee is a set price for the completion of a job. An hourly rate is a set cost for every hour the attorney works on a designated job. Attorneys typically charge flat fees for designated tasks and hourly rates for more complex services.

How to negotiate with multiple lawyers?

The first step to negotiating legal fees with your attorney is to compare the hourly rates and flat fees of multiple attorneys. Comparing legal fees from multiple lawyers can give you a sense of how much your attorney should cost based upon your location and legal matter. This can also give you leverage in choosing an attorney that’s willing to fit your budget. For example, you’re more likely to get an attorney whose costs fit your budget by negotiating with multiple lawyers rather than just one.

What is a reduced settlement negotiation fee?

You can propose a reduced “settlement negotiation” contingency fee, which means that the attorney’s contingency percentage will be lower if the case is settled outside of court, and higher if the case is settled in court. For example, your attorney can receive 25% if the case settles and 35% if monetary compensation is recovered by court litigation. This can help incentivize your attorney to not reach a lousy settlement outside of court and take the case to court litigation if necessary.

What is the second circuit ruling in Turner v. Beard?

First, it held that while New York courts had not reconciled Turner and Beard, Phansalkar was liable for forfeiture under either standard: as a top executive of the bank, responsible for the transactions at issue, his disloyalty in such a large percentage of his work “substantially violate [d]” the terms of his employment. Id. at 202-03. Second, and more important for our analysis, the Court ruled that forfeiture under the faithless servant doctrine is not limited by time or task unless “ the contract itself allocates compensation among tasks” — not the case with Phansalkar, who was paid a straight salary plus bonus, and also not the case with an attorney’s typical hourly or contingency arrangement. Id. at 204 (citing Musico, 764 F.2d at 113).

What are the rules of forfeiture in New York?

“An attorney who engages in misconduct by violating the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPCs) is not entitled to legal fees for any services rendered.” Shelton v. Shelton, 151 A.D.2d 659 (2d Dept. 1989). Thus, lawyers have forfeited their fees when they had a conflict of interest [ see, e.g., Quinn v. Walsh, 18 A.D.3d 638, 648 (4 th Dept. 2000); Matter of Winston, 214 A.D.2d 677, 677 (2d Dept. 1995)], violated the “attorney-witness” rule of RPC 3.7 (formerly DR 5-102) [ Brill v. Friends World College, 133 A.D.2d 729, 730 (2d Dept. 1987], violated the “no contact” rule of RPC 4.2 (formerly DR 7-104 (A) (1)) [ Estate of Satin, 265 A.D.2d 330, 330 (2d Dept. 1999)], and repeatedly made misrepresentations to the court. In re Food Mgmt. Group LLC, Adversary No. 06-08470A, 2008 WL 2788738 at *13-14 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008). On the other hand, mere disagreements between a client and a lawyer about strategy [ e.g., Callaghan v. Callaghan, 48 A.D.3d 500, 501 (2d Dept. 2008)], and other distasteful conduct not involving an RPC violation [ Orendick v. Chiodo, 272 A.D.2d 901, 902 (4th Dept. 2000) (lawyer’s post-discharge communication with another attorney, hoping to enlist his help in winning client back, but where no confidential information disclosed) will not result in forfeiture. Forfeiture can result from misconduct that occurs before an attorney’s discharge but is not discovered until after the discharge. Coccia v. Liotti, 70 A.D.3d 747, 757 (2d Dept. 2010, citing Orendick, supra].

What is fee forfeiture?

Fee forfeiture arises in many contexts: as a basis for a client’s refusal to pay a lawyer fired for cause; as a ground for refusing to allow outstanding fees to offset a malpractice judgment; as a defense to a lawyer’s claim for fees; and, most commonly, as a remedy in a client’s lawsuit for breach of fiduciary duty. However it arises, fee forfeiture is solidly grounded in principles of agency law. As the New York Court of Appeals stated in 1886: “An agent is held to uberrima fides in his dealings with his principal, and if he acts adversely to his employer in any part of the transaction … it amounts to such a fraud upon the principal, as to forfeit any rights to compensation for services.” Murray v. Beard, 102 N.Y. 505, 508 (1886); see Restatement (Second) of Agency §469 (1958) (an agent who breaches his duty “is not entitled to compensation even for properly performed services for which no compensation is apportioned”).

What happens if an attorney commits malpractice?

In the malpractice area, the Court of Appeals has ruled that a lawyer who commits malpractice “that results in the client’s loss of recovery upon a valid claim” forfeits any right to offset her unpaid contingent compensation against the award. Campagnola, 76 N.Y.2d at 44, 556 N.Y.S.2d at 242. “The attorney’s malpractice,” the Court held, “constitutes a failure to honor faithfully the fidelity owed to the client and to discharge competently the responsibilities flowing from the engagement.” Id. But the Campagnola court was careful to limit its ruling to a situation where the attorneys “performed absolutely no services in connection with the disputed claim, and thus, even if discharged by plaintiff without cause, would not have been entitled to any quantum meruit compensation.” Id.

What is the right to terminate an attorney?

It is well-established that a client “has an absolute right, at any time, with or without cause, to terminate the attorney-client relationship by discharging the attorney.” Campagnola, 76 N.Y.2d at 43. “If the discharge is with cause, the attorney has no right to compensation or to a retaining lien.” Teichner v. W & J Holsteins, 64 N.Y.2d 977, 979 (1985). New York courts have struggled to define “cause” in this context, but “the case law reflects that it means an attorney has engaged in some kind of misconduct, has been unreasonably lax in pursuing the case, or has otherwise improperly handled the case.” Garcia v. Teitler, 2004 WL 1636982 (citing cases); accord, Coccia, 70 A.D.3d at 757. As the Third Department put it, a “‘for cause’ termination must be based on more than ‘a client’s general dissatisfaction with the attorney’s performance’ … and typically involves a ‘significant breach of legal duty’ such that the client establish that the ‘attorney’s conduct constituted a failure to properly represent [the client’s] interests.’” Doviak v. Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 134 A.D.3d 1324, 1326 (3d Dept. 2015) (citations omitted). Compare Doviak v. Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 A.D.3d 696, 699 (2d Dept. 2011) (failure to convey settlement offer may constitute grounds for discharge for cause) with Wiggins v. Kopko, 105 A.D.3d 1132, 1135 (3d Dept. 2013) (a single “distasteful” telephone call not a basis for discharge for cause when client otherwise expressed satisfaction with attorneys’ services).

What is a for cause determination?

Often, the “for cause” determination takes place in the context of the attorney’s motion to withdraw. But our experience is that this occurs only when the client or her new lawyer is savvy enough to raise it at the motion hearing. More often, the opportunity is missed. Take for example the classic scenario where an attorney recommends a settlement to a client and the client refuses, demanding a trial. The attorney, unwilling to try the case (despite a retainer agreement obligating him or her to do so), moves to voluntarily withdraw under RPC 1.16 (c) (4) (the attorney and client have a “fundamental disagreement”) or (c) (7) (the client “fails to cooperate in the representation”). The client, often unrepresented, does not know enough to object. The judge says: “These people are having a disagreement and I won’t force them to work together.” Nothing is said about whether the withdrawal is “for cause,” even though the attorney’s abandonment of the case cries out for such a finding. Though the client or successor counsel may try to raise the issue at the close of the case, when fees are being divided, the issue may be deemed waived.

Do you have to forfeit fees in New York?

For many years, New York courts have struggled with the question of whether a lawyer who commits misconduct forfeits all the fees on the matter, or just those accrued in connection with, or during the period of, the misconduct. State court decisions are hopelessly split on this point. Some courts require complete forfeiture, regardless of when in the course of the representation the misconduct takes place — a rule consistent with early Court of Appeals decisions such as Murray v. Beard, supra, 102 N.Y. at 505. See, e.g., Coccia, 70 A.D.3d at 758 (counsel must disgorge all attorneys’ fees already paid where he entrusted case to a disbarred lawyer, regardless of result); Estate of Satin, 265 A.D.2d at 330 (attorney who violates RPCs “‘is not entitled to legal fees for any services rendered’” (citation omitted); Yanitelli v. D. Yanitelli & Sons Constr. Corp., 247 A.D.2d 271, 271-72 (1st Dept. 1998) (“numerous violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility in this case over a period of years” results in disgorgement of all fees); Petronieri v. Talasco, 11 A.D.2d 694, 695 (2d Dept. 1960) (lawyer who failed to press case forward with “reasonable diligence … is not entitled to any compensation”); Matter of Estate of Spatola, 196 Misc. 2d 666, 668 (Surr. Ct. Richmond Co. 2003) (where attorney properly handled one case for Estate but missed statute of limitations on another, and then concealed the wrongdoing from the executor, attorney receives no fees on either case). This is particularly true where the court finds a conflict existed from the inception of the representation. E.g., Griffin v. F.J. Sciame Constr. Co, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 100, 100 (1st Dept. 1999); Pessoni v. Rabkin, 220 A.D.2d 732, 732 (2d Dept. 1995).

How to coerce a client to pay a lawyer?

Lawyers frequently try to coerce payment by asserting an “attorneys’ lien” on all or part of a former client’s case file pending receipt of payment. Depending on whether the case or transaction is over, this can leave the client in the unenviable position of having to pay the fee to get much-needed papers for an ongoing legal matter. However, in practice a client operating in good faith has little to fear. If the client has a need for the documents in an ongoing matter, and a good faith basis for not paying a portion of the fee, lawyers cannot withhold critical papers. Even after the attorney-client relationship is over, the lawyer has a duty to assist in an orderly transition to replacement counsel to minimize prejudice to his former client.

What is a lawyer's agreement?

Lawyers will often refer to agreements they have with clients, typically drafted by the lawyer at the beginning of the engagement, as evidence that a client agreed to certain payment terms. For example, there may be agreement as to hourly rates, staffing, or contemplated courses of action.

What happens if you don't raise your lawyer's billing concerns?

The downside of not raising billing concerns with your lawyer is substantial. You lose the chance to obtain a mutually-agreed upon reduction. The billing practice that offends you will no doubt continue. Finally, if the fee dispute ever gets litigated or arbitrated, your lawyer will claim that you consented to the disputed billing practice.

Why do lawyers give bonuses?

Despite this, lawyers often tell their clients they are entitled to a “bonus” over the agreed-upon fee because the matter has become more difficult than expected or because of an unexpectedly favorable result. It is common for such a lawyer to “negotiate” the increased fee in the middle of an engagement.

What to do if you get a high bill from an attorney?

There are steps you can take both during and after the engagement to communicate your concerns to your lawyer. Appropriate questioning of bills often leads to a mutually-agreed upon reduction, and can even strengthen the attorney-client relationship. Should all else fail, fee dispute litigation provides substantial relief from some relatively common examples of attorney overbilling, while protecting an attorney’s right to a reasonable fee. Ten points for clients to consider:

What is the code of professional conduct and responsibility for lawyers in New York?

In an effort to ensure that lawyers do not use superior experience or negotiating skills in drafting agreements with their clients, the Code of Professional Conduct and Responsibility that applies to all lawyers in New York State (other states have similar or identical codes) provides that an attorney “shall not enter into an agreement for, charge or collect an illegal or excessive fee.” DR 2-106 [A].

What to do if your lawyer is unwilling to discuss your bills?

If your lawyer is unwilling to discuss the bills, you should put your concerns in writing, and consider ending the relationship.

What happens if a fiduciary breaches his duty?

In cases involving an egregious breach of a fiduciary duty such as when the fiduciary breaches his duty for personal gain, punitive damages are necessary . Without punitive damages the fiduciary has nothing to lose by attempting to take from the estate. He is, in effect, playing with the estate’s assets. If the fiduciary is caught, all he would have ...

How long did William secretly obtain a second appraisal?

He secreted this appraisal for over two years repeatedly denying its existence in requests to admit, interrogatories and at his deposition. The appraisal was turned over to plaintiff’s counsel as soon as his new attorney became aware of it.

What happens if a beneficiary loses?

If the wronged beneficiary loses, he has to pay not only his attorney fees and costs but is often, in fact, participating in paying of the defense fees and costs as well. Fiduciaries, especially those who have committed transgressions, are well aware of this cold hard fact of life. In cases involving an egregious breach ...

Did the probate court error in finding that respondent’s conduct justified an award for punitive damages?

We conclude that the probate court did not error in finding that respondent’s conduct justified an award for punitive damages where he used his position as a Chicago Police Officer to gain Hoellen’s trust and confidence, exert undue influence over him and then flagrantly and intentionally breach the fiduciary duty that he owed him.

Can Illinois courts impose punitive damages?

According to case law, there appears to be an indication that Illinois courts are more willing to impose punitive damages against a person who breaches their fiduciary duty than they were in the past. Additionally, the courts seem to be willing to order as elements of the punitive damages, attorney fees and the costs necessary to prove the claim ...

Who reduced the appraisal at the request of William Talty?

On cross-examination the accountant testified that he reduced the appraisal at the request of William Talty. The trial court found the real estate appraiser hired by William “to be the worst expert witness the court had heard in 28 years on the bench.”.

Is attorney fees punitive damages?

As stated above in Glass, a realtor was found to be in violation of his fiduciary duties when he steered potential buyers away so that he could purchase the property for himself and resell it at a considerable profit. The court found that the concealment by the realtor of potential purchasers was intentional, not in good faith and intended to be for his personal gain. It concluded that the conduct fulfilled the requirement of aggravated circumstances so as to warrant punitive damages. The Glass court concluded that under the circumstances it was not an abuse of the trial court’s discretion to award attorney fees as an element of punitive damages. The court stated,

image