If the district attorney does not oppose the request, then there is a high likelihood that the judge would grant the expungement request. However, if the district attorney opposes the expungement, then the judge is bound to consider various factors that are discussed in Pennsylvania court cases.
Full Answer
In a case where the United States Attorney was lead counsel in the district court, if the time for appeal or cross-appeal is about to expire (see time limitations, JM 2-4.000) and the United States Attorney has not received notice from the appellate section of the appropriate division of the Department as to whether an appeal is to be taken, a "protective" notice of appeal must be filed …
Sometimes the District Attorney at the local Court of Common Pleas may argue against a person's expungement motion. This can sometimes be opposed through a counter motion, or in extreme cases, the expungement motion must be argued in court. Arguments That Can Be Used Against Your Expungement Motion
What this means is you will almost ALWAYS LOSE an appeal of the trial judge’s decision. The Disqualification Statute CRS § 20-1-107 Section 20-1-107 (2), C.R.S. (2010) provides an inclusive list of circumstances under which a district attorney may …
Apr 11, 2014 · The District Attorney is ethically obligated NOT to file a criminal case if they do not believe they can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. You could contact the California Attorney General, but the AG will not take over prosecution unless they believe the DA has abused the discretion of that office.
Fighting Flores’s efforts is a surprising adversary: Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot. A former judge, Creuzot was elected in 2018, after campaigning on the promise of criminal justice reform. Once in office, he was hailed in national media as a progressive prosecutor in a notoriously conservative state.
The letter to Biden urged him to “disassemble the machinery of death.”. “Every federal prosecutor who still seeks death sets in motion the wheels of a failed system and the government-sanctioned taking of the life of a fellow American,” they wrote.
The man is Billy Chemirmir, an immigrant from Kenya. He is accused of killing more than 20 people. Fellow signatory Bexar County, Texas, DA Joe Gonzales is pursuing a death sentence in the case of Otis McKane, who is accused of shooting a police officer.
Riles, 70, is the longest serving death row prisoner in the United States. “Death penalty law has evolved and now requires jurors to be able to meaningfully consider and weigh mitigation evidence,” Ogg said in a statement. “In 1976, Riles ’ capital murder jury was not given this opportunity.”.
As support for capital punishment has declined, prosecutors even in traditionally conservative districts have said the death penalty should be used sparingly. Texan Harris County DA Kim Ogg, who did not sign the letter, has criticized the death penalty as retributive.
Eyewitness identification is a leading cause of known wrongful convictions, according to the National Registry of Exonerations. Memory, contrary to what was once popular belief, does not work like a recording; rather, it can be corrupted by a number of factors, including repeated viewing of a suspect.
Unfortunately, there is no higher court to appeal to. In Orange County, a homicide DA is assigned to review the police reports regarding the killing. If the assigned DA determines there is not enough evidence to convict the suspect beyond a reasonable doubt, they will not file the murder charge.
If the DA declines to prosecute a potential murder, then there must be very weak evidence indeed, since they usually charge first and ask questions later. They have the power to choose to prosecute or not to prosecute. There is no way to force them to, there is no "appeal" because it is not a court decision.
I will add you always have the court of public opinion...#N#Remember murder trials are extremely costly, they won't embark on a trial unless they have enough evidence to convict...
The District Attorney is ethically obligated NOT to file a criminal case if they do not believe they can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.#N#You could contact the California Attorney General, but the AG will not take over prosecution unless they believe the DA has abused the discretion of that office...
You could probably contact the Governor's office and ask them to put in their two cents and side with you to attempt to have the DA reconsider.
An appeal is a more scholarly proceeding than a trial. Whereas the litigator must be an active strategist in the courtroom, calling witnesses, cross-examining, and making motions or objections, the appellate lawyer builds his or her case in the brief, before the appeal is heard.
Once an appeals court has made its decision, the opportunity for further appeals is limited. As the number of parties filing appeals has risen substantially, the state and federal court systems have implemented changes in an effort to keep up.
Most civil and criminal decisions of a state or federal trial court (as well as administrative decisions by agencies) are subject to review by an appeals court. Whether the appeal concerns a judge's order or a jury's verdict, an appeals court reviews what happened in prior proceedings for any errors of law.
How many depends on the jurisdiction. At the initial appeals court level, courts may have from three to a few dozen judges. Yet on the larger courts, the full number of judges seldom hear claims together. Instead, appeals are typically heard by panels, often comprised of three judges.
Appellate Briefs. The main form of persuasion on appeal is the written appellate brief, filed by counsel for each party. With this brief, the party that lost in the trial court will argue that the trial judge incorrectly applied the law. The party that won below will argue that the trial court's decision was correct.
The record contains the pleadings (plaintiff's complaint and defendant's answer), pre-trial motions, a transcript of what occurred during trial, the exhibits put into evidence, post-trial motions, and any discussion with the judge that did not take place "off the record." The success of an appeal therefore depends on what occurred at trial. If an attorney failed to get critical, available evidence into the record, or to object to something prejudicial, the opportunity to do so is lost.
After Appealing a Court Decision. The party that loses in a state or federal appeals court may appeal to the state Supreme Court or the U.S. Supreme Court. (Most states call their highest court "Supreme Court," though Maryland and New York call theirs the "Court of Appeals.")
District Attorneys are among the most powerful people in the criminal legal system in Massachusetts, and play a major role in determining the way criminal cases are initiated and ultimately resolved. They wield a substantial amount of power throughout the judicial process – from charging decisions to sentencing recommendations.
Civil asset forfeiture is a way for prosecutors to seize property and money that law enforcement officers believe is connected to criminal activity. Here in Massachusetts, our standard for taking that money is very low, and the burden is on the owner of the property to prove it is not connected to criminal activity.