If the person steal things from u it’s not fall in the definition of theft it’s consider extortion or robbery and it will be better if u follow a counsel that is necessary to help u in recovery of your things and he/she is also able to understand the laws complexity. Share Improve this answer answered Nov 11, 2018 at 6:01 Muhammad Mehboob 109 3
Jun 01, 2021 · Jun 01, 2021. A common problem in business that leads to litigation is when someone such as an ex-employee or a business partner is found stealing clients from the company. An employee might leave your employment taking clients, or worse- the company’s client list, with them. Or maybe your business partner has started acquiring clients and secretly …
Nov 28, 2018 · This article was edited and reviewed by FindLaw Attorney Writers | Last updated November 28, 2018. There are any number of ways for an attorney to get in trouble, but one sure fire way is to mishandle client funds. While it's obvious that stealing your client's money constitutes malpractice, there are less obvious, and usually unintentional, ways an attorney can …
Jul 26, 2015 · The answers of these fine attorneys make me proud to be in the profession. What you call "poaching/stealing" is known as marketing. Even if it were legal, what you are thinking about doing is known as "whining". Sell your outstanding services. You can even do some FAQ about what to "watch out for" but don't get into a peeing contest with a skunk.
Attorneys are allowed to deposit money out of their own pockets into their client trust account to pay bank charges, but probably a better practice is to set up a system with the bank that automatically takes moneys out of the attorney's general account. This practice will make sure the attorney does not commingle funds ...
There are any number of ways for an attorney to get in trouble, but one sure fire way is to mishandle client funds. While it's obvious that stealing your client's money constitutes malpractice, there are less obvious, and usually unintentional, ways an attorney can accomplish the same thing with an attorney client trust account.
A definite no-no is commingling client trust funds with the attorney's own money. Of course, this means keeping the funds in a separate bank account, but there is more to it than that.
Kiting refers to paying for something before you have the funds. A typical example is writing a check today against monies that will be deposited tomorrow, but it could also be paying one client from another client's money deposit. Examples of kiting funds include:
Paying a Client Early. It's bad practice to pay a client's portion of the settlement monies before the check has cleared the bank. The check may not clear and a commingling of funds will occur if attorneys deposit their own money to cover the payment to the client.
Overdraft Protection. On its face, this isn't a bad idea, especially for paying those pesky bank fees. However, if it's used to pay the client early before the money is received or the check has cleared then it is an impermissible loan that creates a commingling problem.
In New York, an employer cannot take legal action against former employees who solicit its customers unless the employer's customer list "could be considered a trade secret or there was wrongful conduct by the employee, such as physically taking or copying the employer's files or using confidential information.".
If a client list can be independently compiled from sources outside the employer's business, then such a list would not be a trade secret and would be unprotected unless a former employee steals or copies the list. Id. In addition, if a limited number of names and phone numbers of clients are "imbedded in [the] memory" of a former employee ...
The "unclean hands" of the former employees, combined with the extremely secretive customer information retention policy of the former employer, convinced the court that this was the type of case where former employees should not be allowed to solicit customers from their former employer.
The answers of these fine attorneys make me proud to be in the profession. What you call "poaching/stealing" is known as marketing. Even if it were legal, what you are thinking about doing is known as "whining". Sell your outstanding services.
You are better off focusing on your ability as a webmaster than on your competition. I think that what you are planning can get you into a defamation or tortious interference with contract based lawsuit.
Not to pick on you, but you sound like you have a lot of time on your hands. Are you sure this route here is really the best avenue to go down regards to your own business? I would focus more on attracting your own clients and much less on what the competition is doing.
Poaching and stealing are called that because they are illegal. Defaming another company may open you up for all kinds of lawsuits, including defamation, interference with the right of contract, etc. etc. etc. As you are not one of their clients, their behavior does not damage you. Crusaders are like vigilantes.
I agree with attorney Ballard, you can solicit and offer your services to anyone, just be sure not to make mention of the company you mentioned in your findings.
Are you "solid legally" to do what? To try to persuade that company's existing clients to use your services? Sure, that's called competition. But you can't do so by accusing the other company of unlawful behavior or breaching its contract with its client. Even if you're right.
In most cases, a board of lawyers and non-lawyers will review the complaint. If there’s a potential ethical violation, the board will give the lawyer a copy of the complaint and an opportunity to respond.
Lawyers are human, and like everyone else, they sometimes make mistakes when representing clients. In some cases, the mistakes are small and easily fixable—for example, not filing enough copies of a document with the court or needing to reschedule a meeting. Other times, the mistakes are serious—such as missing the deadline to file a lawsuit, ...
Lawyers are given a lot of responsibility and often deal with serious matters, from criminal charges to child custody to tax and other financial matters. When you hire a lawyer, you are trusting him or her to represent your interests in the best manner possible.
The American Bar Association publishes the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which lists standard ethical violations and best practices for lawyers. Some states have adopted the model rules as their own ethical rules, while others use it as a guide and modify or add rules.
Lawyers have a duty to keep their clients reasonably informed about the status of their cases, to respond promptly to requests for information, and to consult with their clients about important decisions in their cases (for example, whether to accept a settlement offer). Not returning the client's documents.
When a client fires a lawyer and asks for the file, the lawyer must promptly return it. In some states, such as California, the lawyer must return the file even if attorneys’ fees haven’t been paid in full. Lawyer incompetence. Lawyers must have the knowledge and experience to competently handle any case that they take on.
Lawyer incompetence. Lawyers must have the knowledge and experience to competently handle any case that they take on. They must also be sufficiently prepared to handle matters that come up in your case, from settlement negotiations to trial. Conflicts of interest.