May 10, 2020 · He is incapable of the job, and is the top of the list of corrupt members of the Trump administration who need to be removed from office. Sign below and demand that Attorney General Barr resign from the position and make way for someone qualified and respectful of the office. PETITION LETTER: Dear Attorney General Barr,
Thu Jan-18-07 01:47 PM. Response to Original message. 5. He can be impeached as he was appointed by the President. The office of Attorney General is considered a "civil officer of government"..appointed by the President, in a cabinet level office, …
1 Answer Active Oldest Votes 1 The AG is technically the boss of everyone in the DOJ, and can fire people if they don't do as he says. To fire people appointed by the president and confirmed by congress, he would need the approval of the president. The SDNY does not have to ask for permission to start a case, but they can be fired. Share
Expose & report corrupt judges & attorneys. File official complaints to your state judicial oversight bodies. Cite specific violations of rules or codes. And then publish those complaints here and on the FCLU’s Facebook and Twitter sites. Research and publish reports on corrupt judges.
The President of the United States has the authority to appoint U.S. Attorneys, with the consent of the United States Senate, and the President may remove U.S. Attorneys from office. In the event of a vacancy, the United States Attorney General is authorized to appoint an interim U.S. Attorney.
Attorneys General. While impeachment proceedings against cabinet secretaries is an exceedingly rare event, no office has provoked the ire of the House of Representatives than that of Attorney General. During the first fifth of the 21st century, no less than three Attorneys General have been subjected to the process.
The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office. In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from holding public offices in the future. There is no appeal.
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all ...
Assuming this line of cases serves as a guide in deciding who is a civil officer subject to impeachment, it appears that employees, as non-officers, are not subject to impeachment, while principal officers, such as the head of a cabinet-level executive department, are.
The impeachment process was first used by the English Parliament in the 14th century. Following the British example, the U.S. Constitution and all state constitutions except Oregon's include an impeachment doctrine.
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
a statement in the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8) granting Congress the power to pass all laws necessary and proper for carrying out the enumerated list of powers.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Appointment and removal power, in the context of administrative law, refers to the authority of an executive to appoint and remove officials in the various branches vested in its authority to do so.
In the absence of specific legislative provision to the contrary, the President may at his discretion remove an inferior officer whose term is limited by statute, 606 or one appointed with the consent of the Senate.
Revocation. The principal of a power of attorney can revoke it at any time. The only caveat is that they must be competent at the time of revocation. They may revoke the POA in two ways: 1 Verbal revocation: As long as you are of sound mind, you can revoke someone’s POA privileges simply by telling them out loud and in front of witnesses that you no longer wish for them to retain power of attorney privileges over your property and/or affairs. It’s that simple. However, depending on the circumstances, simply verbalizing this wish leaves the matter open to question and interpretation. 2 Written revocation: In order to avoid any issues, executing a written revocation identifying the POA and sending it to your agent is by far the better option. It should be signed by you in front of a notary public and delivered to the attorney-in-fact – plus any third parties with whom your agent has been in contact on your behalf (your bank, doctors, nursing facility, etc.).
They may revoke the POA in two ways: Verbal revocation: As long as you are of sound mind, you can revoke someone’s POA privileges simply by telling them out loud and in front of witnesses that you no longer wish for them to retain power of attorney privileges over your property and/or affairs. It’s that simple.
A signed POA appoints a person – an attorney-in-fact or agent – to act upon behalf of the person executing the POA document when he or she is unable to do so alone . There are generally four ways these privileges may be granted: Limited Power of Attorney. Gives an agent the power to act for a very limited purpose. General POA.
Springing POA. One effective only in the event the principal becomes incapacitated. Due to the powerful nature of POA privileges, sometimes situations arise in which it is necessary to remove appointed individuals from this role.
AttorneyBusters.com was created as a vehicle to encourage attorneys, judges, public officials and the media to perform their duties with ethics and responsibility, and promote laws that would discourage them from abusing special privileges. Certain privileges must be preserved, but used with responsibility and for the proper purposes intended.
Freedom of the Press should not mean that they are free from upholding their duty to report. It is the ethical responsibility of journalists to act as the eyes and ears of the public by reporting on the acts of public officials for all to know and then make an informed judgment.