what two challenges can an attorney make for potential jurors that he wishes to exclude?

What two challenges can an attorney make for potential jurors that he wishes to exclude? Describe each challenge. Schach Answer:Two challenges that an attorney can make for potential jurors are peremptory challenges and challenges for cause. Peremptory challenges are objections to a juror for which no reason has to be offered.

Full Answer

How does a lawyer question a juror for cause?

Mar 29, 2017 · What two challenges can an attorney make for potential jurors that he wishes to exclude? Describe each challenge. Two challenges that an attorney can make for potential jurors are peremptory challenges and challenges for cause. Peremptory challenges are objections to a juror for which no reason has to be offered. Challenges for cause are objections to jurors for …

How do lawyers use peremptory challenges?

Sep 27, 2021 · By using a peremptory challenge, a lawyer can dismiss a potential juror from the case without giving any reason to the judge. Improper Discrimination in Jury Selection Though lawyers don't need to explain the basis for their use of peremptory challenges, they may not use them to discriminate against potential jurors based on race or gender.

What might affect a juror’s ability to judge a case?

Apr 17, 2020 · What two challenges can an attorney make for potential jurors that he wishes to exclude? Describe each challenge. Two challenges that an attorney can make for potential jurors are peremptory challenges and challenges for cause. Peremptory challenges are objections to a juror for which no reason has to be offered.

Can a judge reject a juror for no reason?

Jul 27, 2017 · To that end, lawyers and the judge question each would-be juror, looking for evidence of impermissible bias. When such bias is uncovered, the individual will be excused “for cause,” which means that the lawyer making the challenge can articulate to the judge an acceptable reason for rejecting that person.

What are 2 types of challenges to remove potential jurors?

After questioning prospective jurors, each side's attorney may challenge certain jurors using two types of challenges: "for cause" and "peremptory." By challenging a juror, the attorney is asking the judge to excuse that juror from the panel.

What type of challenges allow an attorney to dismiss a potential juror for no given reason quizlet?

Each side may also discharge a certain number of prospective jurors without giving any reasons; these are called peremptory challenges.

Which type of challenge requires an attorney to give reason why the potential juror should be removed from the jury pool?

In using a cause challenge, the lawyer trying to remove a juror must give a reason to believe the juror won't be able to reach a fair verdict.

What are two types of challenges an attorney can make during voir dire quizlet?

There are two types of challenges; challenge for cause and peremptory challenge.

What are the three types of challenges that are recognized in criminal courts during the jury selection process?

1. an opinion by defense counsel, that the indictment or information is not sound, 2. violations of speedy trial legislation, 3. a plea bargain with the defendant, which may require testimony against codefendants, 4.

What is a challenge for cause?

A challenge that aims to disqualify a potential juror for some stated reason. Typical reasons include bias, prejudice, or prior knowledge that would prevent impartial evaluation of the evidence presented in court.

How can jurors be challenged?

With regards to challenges to the polls, a juror can be challenged on the grounds of bias, which would cause him to be unsuitable to try the case. For example, where he has expressed hostility to one side or connected to one side in some way.Jul 10, 2018

What are two situations that might amount to a challenge for cause?

Attorneys may make an unlimited number of challenges for cause. A challenge for cause may be made for any reason that the attorney feels would make the individual unable to judge without bias. For example: Alexander is facing trial for charges of armed robbery, fleeing from the police, and assault on a police officer.Aug 31, 2015

What are the differences between a challenge for cause and a peremptory challenge?

Unlike challenges for cause, which must be based on logical reasons why the potential juror is biased, prejudiced, or unquali- fied to serve in a particular case, peremptory challenges are often inspired by hunches, intuition, or "shots in the dark., 20 As a parti- san, a lawyer uses peremptory challenges not to select ...Apr 19, 1997

What types of challenge allows jurors to be excluded after the attorney provides a sound legally justifiable reason why a juror Cannot serve?

Peremptory Challenge - Voir Dire challenges to exclude potential jurors from serving on the jury without any supporting reason or cause.

What is the process of interviewing prospective jurors and either approving of or challenging a persons impartiality toward service on a particular jury?

In voir dire, the attorneys question prospective jurors to determine whether they are biased or have any connection with a party to the action or with a prospective witness.

What does venue mean?

Venue refers to the specific court in which a case is brought. In each city, county, state or country, there may be many courts in which a case may be brought, but one specific court may be more appropriate or proper than another. For a court to be a proper venue, it first must have jurisdiction to hear the case.

Why would a potential juror ignore the judge's instructions?

Similar personal experiences could cause a potential juror to ignore the judge’s instructions to decide the case based on the evidence and the law without “passion or prejudice.”. When a potential juror has had a life experience closely resembling the facts of the case, that person will likely be excused by the court.

Why do lawyers use jury selection questions?

The process of jury selection should result in a fair jury, though lawyers will often use the selection questions to make sure that jurors will be receptive to their theory of the case.

Why do lawyers ask questions?

Experienced attorneys ask questions to get a sense of how a juror will respond to the evidence and arguments in the case about to be tried. In most federal courts, lawyers submit questions to the judge, who will then question the potential jurors in open court. In state courts, however, lawyers are typically permitted to question ...

What is a peremptory challenge?

By using a peremptory challenge, a lawyer can dismiss a potential juror from the case without giving any reason to the judge.

What happens if you don't use questionnaires in court?

If questionnaires are not used, lawyers or judges simply ask all of their questions in open court. Potential jurors may be questioned as a group or one at a time.

What does "for cause" mean in court?

A “for cause” dismissal means the court has agreed with at least one lawyer’s argument about the unsuitability of a potential juror (or has reached this conclusion on its own). A lawyer can raise an unlimited number of “for cause” challenges during jury selection.

How to determine how potential jurors will react to that trial strategy?

The defense lawyer might attempt to determine how potential jurors will react to that trial strategy by asking questions about the right to “stand your ground,” to defend your property, to possess firearms, and to protect others from harm.

What are personal experiences that might affect the person's ability to judge the case?

Personal experiences that might affect the person’s ability to judge the case. While a venireperson’s experience with the subject matter of the case might make that person an informed juror, it might also make him a biased one. For instance, someone who has himself been the victim of a similar crime might be prone to project his trauma onto ...

What is the crowd of people who show up at the courthouse with jury summons in hand called?

The crowd of people who show up at the courthouse with jury summons in hand are known as “venirepersons, ” which means that they are potential jurors (the group is called “the venire").

What is a peremptory challenge?

These are known as peremptory challenges, which are ways to get rid of jurors who present no obvious evidence of bias or unsuitability.

Why do defense attorneys use peremptories?

Convinced that the juror would not be fair , the defense attorney uses one of his peremptories to excuse her. Another theory for the use of peremptories is that by letting each side dispense with the most unacceptable members of the jury, it results in a more middle-of-the road jury, one not subject to extreme views.

What does "for cause" mean in a case?

When such bias is uncovered, the individual will be excused “for cause,” which means that the lawyer making the challenge can articulate to the judge an acceptable reason for rejecting that person. This article explains the common “for ...

Why do lawyers not use peremptory?

Although lawyers don’t have to give a reason for using a peremptory, they may not use them in order to rid the jury of people of a certain race, religion, gender, or other protected status. If a pattern begins to emerge—the prosecutor excuses every Black juror but no White members—the judge will intervene.

Why are Venirepersons excused?

Venirepersons will be excused if they indicate that they will not convict in view of the sentence that might result. Such sentiments surface in drug use cases, for example, where some people feel quite strongly that personal use of illegal drugs should result in treatment, not incarceration.

What is an example of a peremptory challenge?

Potential jurors may inherently be biased against certain acts or people. For instance, a retired police officer may not be able to serve impartially in a trial for a defendant accused of shooting a police officer while trying to escape a drug house.

What are peremptory challenge simple terms?

Peremptory challenges allow both the accused and the prosecutor to challenge and dismiss a potential juror basically because they do not like how that juror looks. They’re an invitation to discrimination.

How does a peremptory challenge work?

A peremptory challenge results in the exclusion of a potential juror without the need for any reason or explanation – unless the opposing party presents a prima facie argument that this challenge was used to discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, or sex.

What is a peremptory challenge and why might it occur?

Introduction. 3.1 Peremptory challenges and the Crown right to stand aside (stand asides) are challenges to prospective jurors during the final stage of the selection of the jury. They are made by the parties and do not require any reason to be provided.

Why are there peremptory challenges?

A peremptory challenge also allows attorneys to veto a potential juror on a “hunch”. … The existence of peremptory challenges is argued to be an important safeguard in the judicial process, allowing both the defendant and the prosecution to get rid of potentially biased jurors.

What is meant by peremptory challenge give a real world example?

The term peremptory challenge refers to the practice of excusing potential jurors without providing a reason why. Jurors may also be excluded because the attorneys and the judge believe that the juror, for whatever reason, can’t be fair.

What is the difference between a cause challenge and a peremptory challenge?

Challenges for cause differ from peremptory challenges, which may be used by either side to remove prospective jurors for any reason. … Once a challenge for cause is made, it is up to the judge to decide whether the potential juror is fit to serve on the jury. Challenges for cause may be based on a variety of factors.