Dec 13, 2021 · When All Else Fails Despite your best efforts, sometimes an aggressor will respond only to aggression. In this case, issue a counterthreat to establish your credibility and then immediately shift the focus to identifying each other’s interests, thereby preventing an …
Sep 10, 2021 · First, do not panic. Don’t immediately comply with the letter, get angry and write a fiery response, or destroy the letter in the hope that the issue will go away. You have many decisions to make on how to respond, and a cool head will serve you well.
Mar 10, 2013 · Answered on Mar 17th, 2013 at 10:49 PM It is permissible for an attorney to write a demand letter and say that he will file suit if you don't pay the demand, but after that, he ought to just sue or shut up. You don't have to meet him personally, and you probably should not.
If your lawyer doesn't seem to be working on your case, sending a polite but firm letter laying out your concerns should get your lawyer's attention. Don't threaten to file a malpractice lawsuit or complain to the bar association; such threats will probably …
A threat issued by a pragmatist may convey legitimate sources of power or important needs and constraints. Spanish writer Jose Bergamin once said, “A piece of advice always contains an implicit threat, just as a threat always contains an implicit piece of advice.” Your job as a negotiator is to discover the implicit advice in the pragmatist’s threat.
The first step in effective threat diagnosis is to remove yourself from the situation – physically and/or psychologically.
As customer service representatives have been taught, the best way to handle a “victim” is to listen to his grievances, acknowledge his feelings, and apologize for his troubles. Such moves can be palliative. New York University professor Tom Tyler has shown that when individuals in conflict express their emotions and tell their side of the story, they’re more satisfied with outcomes – even when these outcomes aren’t in their favor. Expressing understanding can defuse tensions and reduce the risk of additional threats, but be careful not to reward tirades with concessions.
Your job as a negotiator is to discover the implicit advice in the pragmatist’s threat. By asking questions, you can unearth novel remedies to her concerns and avoid caving in to surface demands. The goal should be to determine the power or the constraints behind your counterpart’s threat.
Now what? First, do not panic. Don’t immediately comply with the letter, get angry and write a fiery response, or destroy the letter in the hope that the issue will go away. You have many decisions to make on how to respond, and a cool head will serve you well. Although the correspondence will be unique to your situation and the CMLP cannot give you specific legal advice, here are some guidelines to help you determine your course of action.#N#1. Look carefully at the letter’s contents.
If a lawsuit complaint, subpoena, or other legal filing is attached, refer to our sections on Responding to Lawsuits and Responding to Subpoenas for guidance on how best to proceed. 2. Check to see who sent the letter.
The law protects your activity: Go ahead and draft a letter or email back to the sender explaining why you think your actions are appropriate. Stand your ground, but be polite as abrasive language is likely to result in inflaming the recipient and making the situation worse.
It often helps to ask someone you trust to review and edit your letter before you send it. The law does not protect your activity: If you determine that your activity is not legally defensible, stop it immediately and do not wait for the sender to file a lawsuit against you.
If you have proof proof, not suspicion that he is romantically involved with his client, you could report him to the California State Bar Association, as that is an ethical violation. Don't threaten to report him, as that would be wrong, but you have the right to report him for such wrongdoing.
An attorney cannot use threats against someone to gain an advantage in a civil matter. However, the attorney can warn that person that he is about to file a lawsuit to resolve a matter.
It is permissible for an attorney to write a demand letter and say that he will file suit if you don't pay the demand, but after that, he ought to just sue or shut up. You don't have to meet him personally, and you probably should not. If you have proof proof, not suspicion that he is romantically involved with his client, you could report him to the California State Bar Association, as that is an ethical violation. Don't threaten to report him, as that would be wrong, but you have the right to report him for such wrongdoing. You can also hire an attorney to represent you in this matter, and that will put a stop from the attorney's contacting you at all. Good luck.
Sometimes an in-person meeting is a good way of resolving disputes without resorting to a lawsuit. That being said, in the situation you describe, the aggrieved party should at least consult with an attorney to go over the specifics, the background, the evidence and then options and recommendations. It will be worth the cost of the consultation fee.
It is not unethical to threaten a lawsuit if you refuse to negotiate a settlement. You, or whoever is receiving the message should offer to consider any demands, but let the lawyer know you are uncomfortable meeting, if you are. If the lawyer becomes uncivil, or threatens action he knows he cannot take, such as threatening criminal charges, that would be unethical.
If the lawyer is unresponsive and the matter involves a lawsuit, go to the courthouse and look at your case file, which contains all the papers that have actually been filed with the court. If you've hired a new lawyer, ask her for help in getting your file. Also, ask your state bar association for assistance.
If that doesn't work, as a last resort you may need to sue your lawyer in small claims court, asking the court for money to compensate you for what you've spent on redoing work in the file or trying to get the file.
Every state has an agency responsible for licensing and disciplining lawyers. In most states, it's the bar association; in others, the state supreme court. The agency is most likely to take action if your lawyer has failed to pay you money that you won in a settlement or lawsuit, made some egregious error such as failing to show up in court, didn't do legal work you paid for, committed a crime, or has a drug or alcohol abuse problem.
If you lost money because of the way your lawyer handled your case, consider suing for malpractice. Know, however, that it is not an easy task. You must prove two things:
A common defense raised by attorneys sued for malpractice is that the client waited too long to sue. And because this area of the law can be surprisingly complicated and confusing, there's often plenty of room for argument. Legal malpractice cases are expensive to pursue, so do some investigating before you dive in.
If you can't find out what has (and has not) been done, you need to get hold of your file. You can read it in your lawyer's office or ask your lawyer to send you copies of everything -- all correspondence and everything filed with the court or recorded with a government agency.
A lawyer who doesn't return phone calls or communicate with you for an extended period of time may be guilty of abandoning you -- a violation of attorneys' ethical obligations. But that's for a bar association to determine (if you register a complaint), and it won't do you much good in the short term.
“I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, but the pig likes it.”. George Bernard Shaw.
They aren’t business men and they’re usually unwilling to take even the slightest personal risk. Attorneys are very uncomfortable about being attacked personally, and they’re not used to it. You have a lot of leverage over them by going after their license and their reputation, two things they guard dearly.
Extortionists use threats, such as sending intimate photos or videos to friends, family, or employers, or publishing them to YouTube, to coerce payment or services from a victim. Blackmailers threaten to reveal damaging (not always sexual) information or media about the victim if the victim does not meet their demands.
Schedule your free, initial no-obligation consultation by calling us at (216) 373-7706 or by filling out our contact form online.
The scammer will record and preserve the entire chat and every video. They will also visit any other public social media profile the victim has and record the victim’s list of friends. Some sextortionists will conduct a public record search on the victim to find their address, family members, and employer. Once the sextortionist has enough information—and embarrassing content—they will stop chatting. Then, they will begin threatening to “release” or “post” the compromising content unless the victim meets their demands.
Once a video chat begins, the sextortionist will try to manipulate the victim into engaging in sexual behavior. Some sextortionists will use recordings from a pornographic website to make it look like the victim is chatting with a real person in a similar situation.
Catfishing is done by creating a false online identity to enter into a fictitious relationship with a victim. This act can have several motives, including revenge, harassment, and extortion. A sextortionist will often engage in catfishing by pretending to be a fictitious person who is interested in sexual conversation.
If the sextortionist cannot find a close contact from your friend lists, they may threaten to post the chat and/or video to YouTube instead . They will threaten to make the content publicly visible and include your name in the video title or description.
The Chat Quickly Turns Sexual. Once a chat begins, the sextortionist will attempt to turn the conversation into a sexual one. The sextortionist will use sexual language in an attempt to hook the person with whom they are chatting. Some sextortionists will mention that they are underage.
The court is allowed to presume that she has not responded because the medical records will show that she is in fact not disabled, and that therefore she has no support for her claim to maintenance.
The discovery process is one of the most important parts of your family law litigation. You may have sent Interrogatories and Requests To Produce Documents to your ex, and you may have to answer these same discovery requests.
1. Attorney’s fees for bringing Motions To Compel. Since the filing of a Motion To Compel is not normally done, you should not have to pay an attorney to prepare and file one. Especially since your lawyer is doing it because the other party was violating the rules.
So the court can order that your attorney’s fees be paid. Usually this is enough of a threat of a sanction to have the other side comply. 2. Exclusion of evidence. One of the most extreme sanctions is simply not allowing the other side to present any evidence that would have been produced under the discovery requests.
However, the discovery requests must be followed through, especially if her response is no response at all. By quickly and aggressively seeking consequences to her failure to respond to discovery requests, you and your lawyer can either destroy her case or save yourself a lot of hours and money spent in court.
A home seller might potentially do the following if the buyer decides not to go through with the purchase: retain the initial earnest money payment and terminate the contract. sue for breach of contract, or. bring an action for specific performance.
It's wise to stay focused on your top priority as a seller, namely to sell your property rather than to put the squeeze on the person you thought was going to buy it. Even if it's the buyer's fault that the sale didn't close, getting your property back on the market and finding another buyer could be the best thing to do.
A seller may bring a lawsuit against the buyer and ask for money damages when a buyer has not done what was agreed to in the contract. The amount of the damages the court may award will be based on the difference between the contract price and the market value of the property at the time of the breach, less any down payment or other payment already made, plus interest from the date of default. In other words, the court will try to put you in the same financial position as you would have been without the breach.
In most states, the seller has an implied equitable lien on real estate that has been transferred to the buyer for any part of the contract price remaining unpaid. The lien is a right to have the unpaid balance paid out of a sale of the property.
If the inspection turned up defects (as they all do), and the buyer is not willing to deal with those defects or the two of you can't successfully negotiate over repairs, the deal is over and the buyer is not in breach of the contract. Other contract contingencies can bring about similar results.
A lawsuit for specific performance involves the person claiming a breach of contract asking the judge to order that the transaction be completed according to the terms of the contract, rather than ordering a payment of money damages.
It is also valid if the seller has resold the property to another person for more money than the original contract price. When the seller doesn't abide by the contract, or if both buyer and seller are in default, the buyer usually gets the earnest money back.