If you or a loved one were injured by an IVC Filter, get an attorney who has worked on such cases. ou have actually to suffer damages to file a lawsuit. Your lawyer will take your case and tell you what you can expect when filing your lawsuit. Call today and schedule your first consultation completely free of charge.
Full Answer
Do you need an IVC filter lawyer?
Cordis Optease IVC Filter Recall. In March 2013, FDA announced a Class 1 recall [] for 33,000 Optease IVC filters for a labeling correction to minimize the risk of implanting the device backwards.Affected filters were distributed in the U.S. from May 5, 2010 to April 2, 2013.
Who manufactures the optease inferior vena cava (IVC) filter?
Need an IVC Filter Lawyer in Texas? Collen A. Clark is a true advocate for his clients and is passionate about helping Texans. If you or a loved one has an IVC filter implant, even if you were not injured by side effects, you should contact our lawyers immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit.
Why choose our law firm for CORDIS and Cook IVC filter cases?
What is the Cordis optease IVC filter?
What is the average settlement for IVC filter?
between $100,000 and $500,000Based on the IVC filter verdicts and the history of mass tort litigation, settlements may average between $100,000 and $500,000 for significant injury cases but there will certainly be cases that settle higher and lower than that payout range.
What type of doctor removes an IVC filter?
Retrievable IVC filter should be removed according to manufacturer and clinical guidelines and assessment. These devices are placed and removed by an IR physician using precision image guidance. The removal procedure is done, usually on an outpatient basis, under light sedation. The process is similar to insertion.
What is IVC filter lawsuit?
Lawsuits filed in federal court allege that defects in the design of IVC filters manufactured by Bard and Cook make them more likely fracture, migrate, tilt or perforate the inferior vena cava. In some cases, when the devices break, pieces can travel through the body, damaging the heart, lungs and other organs.
Should permanent IVC filters be removed?
According to the FDA and Radiological Society of North America IVC filters should be removed once the danger of a life-threatening clot is over. Although the procedure to remove the filter is also minimally-invasive, removing the device may be challenging especially after prolonged dwell times.
How long does an IVC filter removal take?
Procedure times can be anywhere from 30 minutes to 4 hours. Typical interventional procedures are anywhere from 1 to 4 hours. You will be on bed rest for a minimum of 2 hours, after the procedure. Please have someone available to drive you home after the procedure as you will not be able to drive.
When should IVC be removed?
When should an IVC filter be removed? It is recommended that a removable filter be removed when the risk of a blood clot traveling to the lungs has passed, or if a patient can take blood thinners.
Can you get an MRI if you have an IVC filter?
Most manufacturers make their inferior vena cava (IVC) filters of non-ferromagnetic materials, meaning IVC filters are typically MRI safe.Dec 27, 2019
What IVC filters are recalled?
There are three FDA Class II recalls of IVC filters – the Bard Denali, the Greenfield, and the Cordis OPTEASE filters. There is a Class III FDA recall of the Gunther Tulip filter.Dec 27, 2019
Is Cook Medical settling IVC filter claims?
New Appellate Ruling in Cook MDL Class Action On December 16, 2022, the Seventh Circuit ruled in favor of two Cook IVC filter plaintiffs, reversing the MDL judge who had dismissed their claim citing the statute of limitations.Feb 1, 2022
Can an IVC filter stay in forever?
Until recently, IVC filters were available only as permanently implanted devices. Newer filters, called optionally retrievable filters, may be left in place permanently or have the option to potentially be removed from the blood vessel later.
What happens if you leave an IVC filter in too long?
But blood clot filters can also be dangerous. An IVC filter left in too long can perforate the vein or detach from the vein and migrate elsewhere, causing unintended blockages or damage.Dec 15, 2015
Is IVC filter placement major surgery?
About the Procedure IVC Filter placement and removal is a minimally invasive surgery. The implantation of the IVC filter involves a local anesthetic and numbing medication injected in your skin in the area that the IVC filter will be inserted, preventing discomfort during the surgery.
Overview
The Optease Retrievable Vena Cava Filter is a small, cage-like device that is implanted in the inferior vena cava just below the kidneys. The filter is designed to capture an embolism, a blood clot that has broken loose from the lower body on its way to the heart and lungs. Optease is made by Cordis Corporation, and was cleared for sale on the U.S.
FDA Warning
On May 6, 2014, FDA updated a 2010 Safety Communication after receiving more than 1,000 adverse event reports associated with IVC filters. These included:
Cordis Optease IVC Filter Recall
In March 2013, FDA announced a Class 1 recall for 33,000 Optease IVC filters for a labeling correction to minimize the risk of implanting the device backwards. Affected filters were distributed in the U.S. from May 5, 2010 to April 2, 2013.
Do I Have a Cordis Optease IVC Filter Lawsuit?
The Medical Device Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in IVC filter lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently investigating potential settlements in all 50 states.
What is an IVC filter?
Cordis Corporation manufactures the OptEase inferior vena cava (IVC) filter. It is a temporary implant designed to be removed when it is no longer necessary. The longer it remains implanted, the higher the risk of complications.
Why was Optease recalled?
In March 2013, about 33,000 OptEase filters were recalled because a labeling error might cause it to be implanted backward. If this occurred, there would be nothing to stop the filter from migrating in the bloodstream to a patient’s heart. Click here to read more.
What is the OptEase IVC Filter?
Cordis Corporation manufactures the OptEase retrievable vena cava filter. It is implanted in a patient’s inferior vena cava (IVC) to prevent blood clots in the lower half of the body from traveling to the lungs and causing a pulmonary embolism.
What is the problem?
In March 2013, Cordis recalled about 33,000 OptEase Retrievable Vena Cava Filters due a labeling error involving an arrow pointing the wrong way on a storage tube.
Cordis Studying Long-Term Risks in PRESERVE Trial
Cordis is participating in the PRESERVE clinical trial, a 5-year safety study involving seven types of retrievable vena cava filters. The study began in early 2015 and will enroll about 2,100 patients, including at least 300 who are implanted with the TrapEase or OptEase vena cava filter.
FDA Safety Warnings
The FDA has issued several warnings about the dangers of leaving retrievable vena cava filters implanted for long periods of time, after the patient is no longer at risk of a pulmonary embolism.
Safety Risks
The longer a retrievable filter remains implanted, the higher the risk of complications such as:
IVC Filter Lawsuits
Hundreds of people who were injured by vena cava filters have already filed lawsuits against manufacturers like C.R. Bard and Cook Medical. These lawsuits are not part of a class action — instead, they are individual lawsuits that have centralized at the federal level in Arizona and Indiana ( MDL No. 2570 ).
IVC Filter Lawsuit Information
Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has an IVC Filter, our lawyers would like to speak with you immediately. We are evaluating every case regardless of whether you experienced side effects or not. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit.
What You Can Do & How We Can Help
- The Schmidt Firm, PLLC is currently evaluating IVC filter cases in all 50 states, regardless of whether you have been injured or not. If you or somebody you know was implanted with an IVC filter, you should contact our lawyers immediately for a free case consultation. Please use the form below to contact our Defective Medical Device Litigation Group or call toll free 24 hours a d…
Overview
- Cordis Corporation manufactures the OptEaseinferior vena cava (IVC) filter. It is a temporary implant designed to be removed when it is no longer necessary. The longer it remains implanted, the higher the risk of complications.
Design Based on Controversial Filters
- A big problem is that its design is closely related to the C.R. Bard Recovery filter, which was withdrawn from the market in 2005 after being linked to a high risk of fracture. However, because the OptEase was approved with a 510(k) application, it has never been studied for safety in clinical trials and the long-term risks are unknown.
Optease Recall
- In March 2013, about 33,000 OptEase filters were recalled because a labeling error might cause it to be implanted backward. If this occurred, there would be nothing to stop the filter from migrating in the bloodstream to a patient’s heart. Click here to read more.
FDA Safety Recommendations
- Due to increased risks like filter fracture, migration, and organ damage, the FDA recommends removing IVC filers 29-54 days after implantation. However, studies have found that real-world retrieval rates remain as low as 20%. The FDA has issued a Safety Communicationto warn about side effects, such as: 1. Filter fracture 2. Migration or tilting 3. Embolization of broken pieces of t…
IVC Filter Lawsuits Centralized in Multi-District Litigation
- Hundreds of people who were seriously injured by side effects of IVC filters have filed lawsuits. Judges have centralized cases against C.R. Bard and Cook Medical in federal courts in Arizona and Indiana. However, this litigation is not a class action — they are individual lawsuits in a Multi-District Litigation (MDL)and each case can have its own outcome.
What Is The Problem?
- The Schmidt Firm, PLLC is nationally recognized as a class action law firm. However, our lawyers are filing individual lawsuits against Cordis Corporationrather than a a class action lawsuit. If you were injured by the OptEase, you could be entitled to compensation.
About Class Actions
- There are many advantages to a class action when a lot of people have similar legal claims. Everyone joins together to collectively seek compensation. Any payout is divided and shared equally.
Why Our Law Firm Is Filing Individual Lawsuits as Opposed to A Class Action
- Class actions are designed for efficiency — not maximizing compensation for individuals with severe injuries from defective medical devices. Members may have to accept “low-ball” settlements or massive attorneys’ fees that leave plaintiffs little to share. Our attorneys file individual lawsuits so we can focus our efforts on helping people with the most serious injuries. …
Do I Have An IVC Filter Lawsuit?
- The Schmidt Firm, PLLC is evaluating IVC filter cases in all 50 states, regardless of whether you were injured or not. If you or someone you know received an IVC filter implant, please contact our lawyers immediately for a free case consultation. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit. Please use the form below to contact our Defective Medical Device Litigation Group or c…
Popular Posts:
- 1. who is the top rated family law attorney in san antonio texas
- 2. which is better durable power of attorney vs general power of attorney
- 3. children have right to know what is in parents' accounts and power of attorney finance
- 4. texas state pay for attorney for public official who is charged with crime
- 5. who is the beneficiary if i applied ead through attorney
- 6. what firm does this attorney work for simon r. brown concord, nh.
- 7. when did harvey birdman attorney at law start
- 8. who is the oregon attorney general
- 9. what is it called when attorney win or lose in court
- 10. who is the first african american women prosecuting attorney in new york