what is the standard of proof to assert attorney client privilege

by Cale Jacobi 7 min read

The court articulated five requirements: first, the person asserting the privilege must be a client, or must have sought to become a client at the time of disclosure; second, the person connected to the communication must be acting as a lawyer; third, the communication must be between the lawyer and the client exclusively—no non-clients may be included in the communication; fourth, the communication must have occurred for the purpose of securing a legal opinion, legal services, or assistance in some legal proceeding, and not for the purpose of committing a crime; fifth, the privilege may be claimed or waived by the client only (usually, as stated above, through counsel).

Full Answer

When does the lawyer-client privilege apply?

This means that the lawyer-client privilege may begin to apply before you have even hired an attorney. Conversations you have with an attorney when you are considering retaining him/her—but have not yet done so—are still covered by the privilege. 17

What are the exceptions to the California attorney-client privilege?

There are two major exceptions to the California lawyer-client privilege under the California Evidence Code. These are: 2.1. Crime or fraud. The attorney-client privilege does not apply to any communications between a client and his/her attorney that are made in order to enable someone to. commit a crime or fraud, or.

What is the evidence code for confidential communications in California?

Evidence Code 954 makes communications between attorneys and their clients privileged and confidential in California.

What is the 954 Evidence Code?

Evidence Code 954 is the California statute that makes communications between attorneys and their clients privileged and confidential. This is what is known as the “lawyer-client privilege” (or the “attorney-client privilege”).

What is the 954 law?

37 Same. Updated July 30, 2020 Evidence Code 954 is the California statute that makes communications between attorneys and their clients privileged and confidential. This is what is known as the “lawyer-client privilege” (or the “attorney-client privilege”).

What is the lawyer-client relationship?

Therefore, the lawyer-client relationship is one of the most robust privileges in California evidence law. 4. Examples.

Why is Ara still protected?

This is because Ara reasonably believed he was licensed to practice law somewhere.

When to use attorney-client privilege?

The attorney-client privilege may be used when a complaint involves serious concerns (including potential criminal claims), may develop into a lawsuit, or may have the potential to impact a large number of employees (e.g., class action status), among other considerations. It is always best to contact your legal department in advance of launching an investigation when you suspect that the gravity of the situation may give rise to significant liability. So be sure to discuss upfront whether your in-house counsel or outside defense attorney wants any particular emails or document exchanges protected. Further, if you have any question whether or not you should be invoking the attorney-client privilege, always err on the side of caution and protect the documentation trail as much as possible.

What is the rule for a lawyer-client privilege?

Rule 1: Address communications to your attorney. This could be your in-house counsel or outside counsel, but for the attorney-client privilege to become effective, it must be addressed to an attorney who is providing legal advice and counsel. The privilege does not protect communications between workers when no attorney is present. In other words, you can't send an email to your non-attorney boss and mark it "privileged and confidential" because without an attorney on the receiving end to provide legal analysis and advice, there's no mechanism to protect the communication from legal discovery.

What is the rule for copying a document?

Rule 4 : Copy only a limited number of people who have a legitimate need to know the information. Do not copy or share the document with others, or the privilege may be lost. After all, if you copy 15 people on the communication, a court will likely infer that it wasn't all that confidential or proprietary to begin with.

What is business legal 101?

While you may hope that you never need them, it's wisest to bring yourself up to speed with certain elements of "Business Legal 101" to protect yourself and your company from unwanted legal exposure.

Is attorney client communication privileged?

Again, not all attorney-client communications will be deemed privileged once submitted in court, so always proceed with caution and continue to communicate in writing as if your document may be used as evidence in court at some point and blown up and placed in front of a jury.

Does SHRM offer legal advice?

SHRM provides content as a service to its readers and members. It does not offer legal advice, and cannot guarantee the accuracy or suitability of its content for a particular purpose. Disclaimer

Can a court overturn a document that is privileged?

Just because you mark a document "Privileged and Confidential" doesn't mean that a plaintiff's attorney won't challenge the privilege and that a court won't overturn it. Therefore, let caution rule the day when it comes to exchanging emails, documents, or other electronic communications that you mark privileged.

When is the attorney-client privilege still applicable?

Despite the general rule, there's an exception in most states: In general, when a third person is present, the attorney-client privilege continues to apply if that third person is there in order to aid the cause. Put more specifically, the third person must be present while fulfilling a role that furthers the defendant's legal representation.

Why was the attorney-client privilege waived in Missouri?

On the other hand, a Missouri court found that a defendant charged with second degree murder had waived the attorney-client privilege because of a family member's presence at a client-lawyer meeting. During a prior divorce case, the defendant brought her daughter to a meeting with her family law attorney. Because the daughter wasn't essential in conveying information to the lawyer and wasn't reasonably necessary to protect her mother's interests, her presence at the meeting destroyed the privilege. So, the family law attorney's testimony about the meeting—given at the murder trial—was admissible. ( State v. Shire, 850 S.W.2d 923 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).)

Why did the second degree murderer waive the attorney-client privilege?

On the other hand, a Missouri court found that a defendant charged with second degree murder had waived the attorney-client privilege because of a family member's presence at a client-lawyer meeting. During a prior divorce case, the defendant brought her daughter to a meeting with her family law attorney.

What happens if you allow a third party to be present for a lawyer-client conversation?

The general rule is that, by allowing a third party to be present for a lawyer-client conversation, the defendant waives the privilege. That generally means that the prosecution can force the third party to reveal the contents of the conversation.

What does the court say about the presence of the parents?

The court said that the presence of the parents, who had "an understandable parental interest and advisory role in their minor's legal affairs," didn't defeat the attorney-client privilege. That meant that a defendant couldn't question the witness about his conversations with his lawyer. ( State v.

What is a third person in a case?

Put more specifically, the third person must be present while fulfilling a role that furthers the defendant's legal representation. The person might be part of the lawyer's staff, an outside party with relevant expertise (for instance, an investigator), an interpreter, or even a relative who acts in an advisory role.

Why did the daughter choose the law firm for her mother?

The daughter chose the law firm for her mother, transported her to the meetings, and put her at ease so she could communicate with her lawyers. The daughter also had relevant information and could aid her mother's memory.

1. Generally

The federal courts and all of the states recognize a privilege protecting the confidentiality of communications between attorneys and clients. While these privilege rules take many forms, Proposed FRE 503 is representative. It states the essence of the privilege:

2. Choice of Law

Under FRE 501, federal courts look to federal common law in deciding privilege issues in criminal cases, in civil cases where a federal question is involved, or where a constitutional privilege is asserted. In diversity cases, the federal courts apply state law insofar as the relevant claim or defense is controlled by state law.

3. Existence of an Attorney-Client Relationship

One asserting the privilege must first establish the existence of an attorney-client relationship. {footnote}Ex Parte Gonzalez, 686 So.2d 204, 207 (Ala. 1996); Mayberry v. State, 670 N.E.2d 1262 (Ind. 1996); Dietz v. Doe, 935 P.2d 611 (Wash. 1997).

4. Members of the Privileged Relationship

For purposes of the privilege, a “client” may be a person or an entity, {footnote}E.g., Ala. R. Evid. 502 (a) (1); N.J.R.E. 504 (3); Payton v. New Jerset Turnpike Authority, 691 A.2d 321 (N.J. 1997) (turnpike authority a “client”). {/footnote} such as a corporation. {footnote}Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass’n, 320 F.2d 314 (7th Cir.

6. Procedure

Whether a communication is privileged is determined by the trial court. {footnote}Ex Parte DCH Regional Med. Ctr., 683 So.2d 409, 412 (Ala. 1996). {/footnote} The witness is not entitled to decide the question for himself or herself. {footnote}Ex Parte DCH Regional Med. Ctr., 683 So.2d 409, 412 (Ala. 1996); Schein v. Northern Rio Arriba Elec.

7. As a Qualified Privilege

The attorney-client privilege is generally held to be absolute, in the sense that it cannot be pierced on a showing of need. {footnote}E.g., Admiral Ins. Co. v. United States Dist. Court, 881 F.2d 1486, 1493-94 (9th Cir. 1989).

9. Waiver

A client can waive the attorney-client privilege explicitly or by implication. {footnote}State v. Walen, 1997 Minn. LEXIS 369 (Minn. 1997). 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2327 (McNaughton rev. 1961). {/footnote} A client may waive the privilege by voluntarily disclosing a communication to someone outside the attorney-client relationship. {footnote}Haw. R.

What is attorney-client privilege?

The attorney-client privilege is an essential part of the legal system that protects communications between attorneys and their clients.

What is privilege in litigation?

The privilege allows a client to engage in open and frank discussions with his or her attorney without fear that the information will be disclosed to opposing parties or used as damaging evidence against the client, particularly in the context of a lawsuit.

What is OGC privilege?

Confidential communications between the Office of General Counsel (OGC) attorneys and Emory University and/or Emory Healthcare (collectively, “Emory”) officers, administrators, physicians, faculty, and staff for the purpose of seeking legal advice concerning Emory business matters are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Communications are privileged whether in written, oral, or electronic form, but must be kept confidential in order for the privilege to apply. If the substance of the communications is disclosed to persons outside Emory, or even to persons within Emory who are not directly involved in the matter, the privilege may be lost. Therefore, communications with OGC attorneys should not be discussed with anyone outside Emory, including family members and friends.

How to treat attorney-client communications?

Treat attorney-client communications in a confidential manner (e.g., do not leave the materials on conference room tables or in any other location where the information may be easily viewed by third parties).

Can you copy an attorney on an email exchange?

Likewise, copying an attorney on a string of email exchanges where the attorney is not providing (or not being asked to provide) legal advice will not protect the communications from discovery.

Does attorney-client privilege attach to documents?

As with other types of privileges, the attorney-client privilege does not automatically attach to conversations, documents, and other types of communications. The attorney-client privilege must be asserted at the time the disclosure is demanded by a third party.

Can you discuss attorney-client communications with third parties?

Do not discuss attorney-client communications with third parties.

What are the elements of attorney-client privilege?

No matter how the attorney-client privilege is articulated, there are four basic elements necessary to establish its existence: (1) a communication; (2) made between privileged persons; (3) in confidence; (4) for the purpose of seeking, obtaining or providing legal assistance to the client. See Teleglobe Communs.

Why is attorney-client privilege important?

The attorney-client privilege is perhaps all the more important in the criminal context where full and frank discussions with counsel are essential to ensure that an individual can be defended against prosecution or incarceration. The attorney-client privilege is different than a defendant’s right against self-incrimination under the US Constitution’s Fifth Amendment which provides that “no person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” In other words, an individual can never be compelled to provide statements to the government or otherwise that could later be used to prosecute him. It is important to note that business entities have no Fifth Amendment rights even though their individual employees do. See Braswell v. United States, 487 U.S. 99, 104-110 (1988).

How to prevent waiver of privileged documents?

The courts have acknowledged this fact and amended the rules of procedure to allow a party to “clawback” inadvertently produced privileged documents and prevent waiver of the privilege. See the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (b) (5) (B); Federal Rule of Evidence 502 (d). To protect against waiver in this context a party to a litigation must do several things. First, they must be diligent in their efforts to detect inadvertently disclosed privileged documents. Second, they must immediately communicate with opposing counsel to request that the documents not be reviewed and that they be destroyed. Third, parties should enter into written agreements governing electronic discovery at the outset of litigation and file the agreement with the Court.

What is the definition of privilege to apply only?

Federal courts often define the privilege to apply only if. (1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a client; (2) the person to whom the communication was made. (a) is a member of the bar of a court, or his subordinate, and. (b) in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer;

What is copy counsel?

Copy counsel on all communications in which legal advice is sought or in which confidential communications (like conclusions or assessments) are transmitted.

Does the attorney-client privilege apply to both individual and corporate clients?

The US Supreme Court has long held that the attorney-client privilege applies to both individual and corporate clients. See Gardner v. Major Auto. Cos., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44877 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2014) (citing United States v. Louisville Nashville R. Co., 236 U.S. 318 (1915)). However, complications in the application of the privilege arise when the client is a business entity.

Who holds the privilege of a client?

The privilege is held by the client and can only be waived by the client.

What is attorney client privilege?

Piercing the attorney-client privilege may be one of opposing counsel’s top priorities irrespective of the strength of their case. The privilege protects confidential communications between the client and the lawyer made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal assistance, to “encourage full and frank communication . . . and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice.” United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. at 562, 109 S.Ct. 2619 (quoting Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389, 101 S.Ct. 677, 66 L.Ed.2d 584 (1981) ). But the privilege may not apply, it may be waived, or there may be exceptions to it. Counsel’s position on issues concerning potentially privileged documents impacts his or her credibility with the court, so it is advisable to be fully familiar with the scope of the privilege from the first time the issue arises in a matter, and not when it is too late.

Do officers, directors, and employees need in-house counsel?

Officers, directors, and employees must rely on in-house counsel to understand the difference. The predominant purpose of the communications should seek legal services for the privilege to apply. Copying in-house counsel on communications does not make them privileged.

Should outside counsel retain consultants?

Clearly identify when seeking or providing legal advice. Only outside counsel should retain and communicate with consultants during litigation. Retention by in-house counsel is preferable to retention by corporate management. Explain privilege limits and waiver to the client at the beginning and throughout a matter.

What is attorney-client privilege?

The attorney-client privilege protects communications between clients and their lawyers under certain circumstances.

What is the oldest and most important evidentiary protection?

The attorney-client privilege stands alone as the oldest and most important evidentiary protection.

What chapter in the Work Product doctrine is the work product doctrine?

Chapters 33 through 38 begin the discussion of the work product doctrine.

What Is The Lawyer-Client Privilege?

Image
The lawyer-client privilege is set out in Evidence Code 954. This statute provides that: 1. A client does not need to disclose any confidential communications between him/herself and his/her attorney that take place within the lawyer-client relationship; and 2. The client may also prevent the attorney (or another third part…
See more on shouselaw.com

What Are Exceptions to The Lawyer-Client Privilege?

  • There are two major exceptions to the lawyer-client privilege under the California Evidence Code. These are:
See more on shouselaw.com

What Is Waiver of The California Attorney-Client Privilege?

  • In addition to the exceptions to the privilege discussed above, you can also waive—that is, eliminate—the lawyer-client privilege by voluntarily doing either of the following: 1. Disclosing a significant part of the privileged communication between you and your lawyer to a third party, or 2. Consenting to the disclosure of that privileged communication by anyone else.36 And if you fail to claim the attorney-client privilege in a court proceeding wher…
See more on shouselaw.com

For Legal Representation…

  • If you have additional questions about the lawyer-client privilege in California, or you would like to discuss your case confidentially with one of our attorneys, do not hesitate to contact us at Shouse Law Group. (For cases in Colorado, see our article on attorney-client privilege law in Colorado.) We have local criminal law offices in and around Los Angeles, San Diego, Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, San Jose, Oakland, the San F…
See more on shouselaw.com

Generally

  • The federal courts and all of the states recognize a privilege protecting the confidentiality of communications between attorneys and clients. While these privilege rules take many forms, Proposed FRE 503 is representative. It states the essence of the privilege: A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional l…
See more on lawserver.com

Choice of Law

  • 2(a). Federal Courts
    Under FRE 501, federal courts look to federal common law in deciding privilege issues in criminal cases, in civil cases where a federal question is involved, or where a constitutional privilege is asserted. In diversity cases, the federal courts apply state law insofar as the relevant claim or defense is controlled by state law. Where there is …
  • 2(b). State Choice of Law Rules
    There is a split of authority as to whether privileges are procedural or substantive law. See PRIVILEGE § 2. Choice of Law. If procedural, then the law of the forum state will be applied. Ordinarily this will be wherever the trial court sits, but not always: where the privilege is asserted in proceedings to compel compliance with a subpoena serve…
See more on lawserver.com

Existence of An Attorney-Client Relationship

  • 3(a). Generally
    One asserting the privilege must first establish the existence of an attorney-client relationship.{footnote}Ex Parte Gonzalez, 686 So.2d 204, 207 (Ala. 1996); Mayberry v. State, 670 N.E.2d 1262 (Ind. 1996); Dietz v. Doe, 935 P.2d 611 (Wash. 1997).{/footnote} It is not sufficient f…
See more on lawserver.com

Members of The Privileged Relationship

  • 4(a). Organizations Generally
    For purposes of the privilege, a “client” may be a person or an entity,{footnote}E.g., Ala. R. Evid. 502(a)(1); N.J.R.E. 504(3); Payton v. New Jerset Turnpike Authority, 691 A.2d 321 (N.J. 1997) (turnpike authority a “client”).{/footnote} such as a corporation.{footnote}Radiant Burners, Inc. v. American Gas Ass’n, 320 F.2d 314 (7th Cir. 1963).{/footn…
  • 4(b). The Attorney
    The privilege only extends to communications with an attorney or an attorney’s agent.{footnote}U.S. v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107 (2d Cir. 1984) (communication with non-lawyer not privileged).{/footnote} An attorney need not be licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where the communication took place for the privilege to apply.{footnote}P…
See more on lawserver.com

The Scope of Matters Privileged

  • 5(a). Communications
    The majority rule is that the privilege protects not only clients’ communications to attorneys, but also attorneys’ communications to clients.{footnote}In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 803 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1986); Coastal States Gas Corp. v. Dept. of Energy, 617 F.2d 854, 199 App. D.C. 272 (D.C.Cir. 1980); Hearn v. Rhay, 68 F.R.D. 57…
  • 5(b). Purpose of Facilitating Legal Services
    Not every communication to one’s attorney is a privileged attorney-client communication.{footnote}State v. Marshall, 690 A.2d 1 (N.J. 1997).{/footnote} The privilege only extends to communications for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of legal services.{footnote}U.S. v. Horvath, 731 F.2d 557 (8th Cir. 1984); United States v. …
See more on lawserver.com

Procedure

  • 6(a). Generally
    Whether a communication is privileged is determined by the trial court.{footnote}Ex Parte DCH Regional Med. Ctr., 683 So.2d 409, 412 (Ala. 1996).{/footnote} The witness is not entitled to decide the question for himself or herself.{footnote}Ex Parte DCH Regional Med. Ctr., 683 So.2d 409, 412 (Ala. 1996); Schein v. Northern Rio Arriba …
  • 6(b). Standing to Assert or Waive Privilege
    The privilege is personal in nature and generally only the client or the client’s representative may waive or assert it. Persons representing or acting on behalf of the client who may assert or waive the privilege include the client’s attorney, conservator, guardian, executor or administrator.{footnote}Cal. § 953.{/footnote} A bankruptcy trustee …
See more on lawserver.com

as A Qualified Privilege

  • The attorney-client privilege is generally held to be absolute, in the sense that it cannot be pierced on a showing of need.{footnote}E.g., Admiral Ins. Co. v. United States Dist. Court, 881 F.2d 1486, 1493-94 (9th Cir. 1989).{/footnote} It has been held that the privilege is not absolute, but may be pierced upon a showing of need, relevance and materiality, and that the information could not be secured from any less intrusive source.{footnote…
See more on lawserver.com

Adverse Inferences

  • A number of courts have held that an adverse inference may be drawn from a witness’ proper assertion of the attorney-client privilege,{footnote}Harris v. C.I.R., 461 F.2d 554 (5th Cir. 1972) ; Electro Med. Sys. v. Cooper Life Sciences, Inc., 34 F.3d 1048, 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (allowing negative inference in civil case); Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible, Inc., 793 F.2d 1565, 1580 (Fed. Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1034 (1987) (alleged infringer’s f…
See more on lawserver.com

Waiver

  • 9(a). Generally
    A client can waive the attorney-client privilege explicitly or by implication.{footnote}State v. Walen, 1997 Minn. LEXIS 369 (Minn. 1997). 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2327 (McNaughton rev. 1961).{/footnote} A client may waive the privilege by voluntarily disclosing a communication to someone outside the attorney-client relationship.{footnot…
  • 9(b). Waiver as to Documents On the Same Subject Matter
    Disclosure of a privileged communication results not just in a waiver as to that communication, but also in "subject matter waiver"– waiver with respect to any other privileged information regarding the same subject.{footnote}In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 109 S. Ct. 1655 (198…
See more on lawserver.com

End of Attorney-Client Relationship

  • The attorney-client privilege survives the termination of the attorney-client relationship.{footnote}Kevlik v. Goldstein, 724 F.2d 844 (1st Cir. 1984).{/footnote}
See more on lawserver.com