What are the steps or stages in the juvenile justice system? The juvenile justice system is a multistage process: (1) delinquent behavior, (2) referral, (3) intake/diversion, (4) transfer/waiver, (5) detention, (6) adjudication, (7) disposition, (8) juvenile corrections and (9) aftercare.Dec 12, 2020
The present authorized or "formal" juvenile justice system is the process that has responsibility and authority for public reaction to juvenile delinquency. Included within that process is a col- lection of public and private agencies, agents, laws, rules and policies dealing with juvenile delinquency.
The primary goals of the juvenile justice system, in addition to maintaining public safety, are skill development, habilitation, rehabilitation, addressing treatment needs, and successful reintegration of youth into the community.
WHEN THIS DECISION IS MADE BY A JUDICIAL OFFICER, THE SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT DUE PROCESS REQUIRES THAT THE JUVENILE BE GRANTED A HEARING OR AT LEAST THAT THE OFFICER STATE FULLY THE REASONS FOR HIS DECISION. THIS JUDICIAL DECISION IS FULLY REVIEWABLE.
The juvenile justice process involves nine major decision points: (1) arrest, (2) referral to court, (3) diversion, (4) secure detention, (5) judicial waiver to adult criminal court, (6) case petitioning, (7) delinquency finding/adjudication, (8) probation, and (9) residential placement, including confinement in a ...
The major components of the juvenile justice system are also featured, including law enforcement, prosecution and the courts, and corrections. Corrections is presented in a broad context, with each correctional component described.
probationHowever, because probation is the most common disposition ordered by juvenile courts, the absolute growth in the number of cases placed on probation is much greater than the growth for other dispositions.
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act The landmark policy that established the system we currently operate under was the 1974 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act called for a "deinstitutionalization" of juvenile delinquents.
A "juvenile" is a person who has not attained his eighteenth birthday, and "juvenile delinquency" is the violation of a law of the United States committed by a person prior to his eighteenth birthday which would have been a crime if committed by an adult.Jan 16, 2020
The United States Supreme Court has held that in juvenile commitment proceedings, juvenile courts must afford to juveniles basic constitutional protections, such as advance notice of the charges, the right to counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and the right to remain silent.Jan 22, 2020
Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law In 1967 a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process rights as adults. The case involved Jerry Gault, who at 14 was given a seven-year sentence for a prank phone call. Gault's story didn't end there.May 19, 2007
However, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided In re Gault, it held that juveniles facing delinquency proceedings are entitled to their Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel, including for indigent defendants, under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
Advances in neuroscience and research in adolescent development illustrate why a juvenile defender’s role is so crucial to protecting the rights of young people. We know from everyday experience that youth and adults are different. Youth are more likely to act more impulsively, and succumb to peer pressure. What we see in every day youth behavior is borne out by the latest neuroscience and developmental science studies. Even the Supreme Court has taken note that, “developments in psychology and brain science continue to show fundamental differences between juvenile and adult minds”—for example, in “parts of the brain involved in behavior control.”iv Developmental research confirms that youth are less likely than adults to understand and anticipate the future consequences of their decisions and actions. Recent progress in brain imaging provides physical evidence to show that regions of the brain controlling decision-making and impulse regulation are the last to mature. The effects of this decision-making calculus are amplified in times of stress and anxiety.v Experts find that youth are able to make much better decisions when informed and unhurriedthan when they are under stress or the influence of peers or authority.vi
The Constitution requires that the “guiding hand of counsel” be available to all juveniles in delinquency proceedings.xv Despite this, a system for affording effective juvenile defense has yet to be fully established and implemented in the United States.
In addition to being fluent in developmental considerations, juvenile defenders must also have special training in juvenile court procedure. When representing clients in the juvenile justice system, the rules, hearings, players (youth, parents, probation, prosecutors and welfare officers), available options, challenges, and outcomes are likely to be quite different than what public defenders experience in the 4adult criminal justice system.
Youth are frequently steered toward waiving their rights. From their first encounter with law enforcement where they may be asked to consent to a search, to the interrogation room where they are asked to waive their Miranda rights, to their initial hearing where they may be asked to waive their right to counsel, to their plea where they are asked whether they wish to waive their trial rights, the pressure is constant. In many Youth are frequently steered jurisdictions these waivers of rights happen prior to the appointment of counsel and without any assistance or toward waiving their rights. advice of counsel.