In a procedure called voir dire, lawyers and, sometimes, judges question potential jurors from a pool of citizens summoned to court to serve jury duty. Voir dire (vwar deer) means “to speak the truth."
However, experienced attorneys will get more out of jury selection than that. They ask questions to get a sense of how a juror will respond to the evidence and arguments in the case about to be tried. Let’s look closer at how lawyers and judges question potential jurors.
Jury Selection Process After you are situated in the courtroom, the judge and lawyers will come in for the voir dire, or jury selection, part of the trial. The judge will make an introduction about the case and the lawyers, and likely thank you for appearing for jury duty. Next, the lawyers will ask you questions.
This is a key part of how lawyers pick jurors. It affords the attorney the opportunity to work out bias, pick those jurors that will most benefit their case, and eliminate those who present a danger or a problem. They key in voir dire is to keep the jurors talking. If the attorney is doing too much of the talking, that’s a real problem.
Lawyers and judges select juries by a process known as "voir dire," which is Latin for "to speak the truth." In voir dire, the judge and attorneys for both sides ask potential jurors questions to determine if they are competent and suitable to serve in the case.
voir dire, in law, process of questioning by which members of a jury are selected from a large panel, or venire, of prospective jurors. The veniremen are questioned by the judge or by the attorneys for the respective parties.
Challenges: The law authorizes the judge and the lawyers to excuse individual jurors from service in a particular case for various reasons. If a lawyer wishes to have a juror excused, he or she must use a "challenge" for that juror.
The rationale behind allowing peremptory challenges is to give the attorneys an opportunity to seat the best jury for each case. Since each side will reject the jurors that they presume will favor the other side, the result should be a well-balanced jury.
Share this page. Voir dire is the process used by the parties to select a fair and impartial jury. During voir dire, the jury panel is questioned by both parties' lawyers. The questions are intended to help the lawyers in the jury selection process.
to speak the truthOctober 2021) Voir dire (/ˈvwɑːr dɪər/; often /vɔɪr daɪər/; from an Anglo-Norman phrase meaning "to speak the truth") is a legal phrase for a variety of procedures connected with jury trials. It originally referred to an oath taken by jurors to tell the truth (Latin: verum dicere).
3.6 The stated function of peremptory challenges is to provide a safeguard to ensure the jury is impartial and the trial is fair. They provide a way for parties to quickly and expediently remove prospective jurors they know or believe may not be impartial.
After questioning prospective jurors, each side's attorney may challenge certain jurors using two types of challenges: "for cause" and "peremptory." By challenging a juror, the attorney is asking the judge to excuse that juror from the panel.
1. ask questions about the witness's character. 2. ask only questions relating to the testimony already given by the witness.
Attorneys may use peremptory challenges to remove jurors based on their propensity to side against their clients. Attorneys may turn to factors such as criminal background, socioeconomic status, occupation, familiarity with the legal system or a myriad of other similar factors.
A peremptory challenge results in the exclusion of a potential juror without the need for any reason or explanation - unless the opposing party presents a prima facie argument that this challenge was used to discriminate on the basis of race, ethnicity, or sex. See Batson challenge.
Typically, a lawyer who uses a peremptory challenge to remove a juror does not have to explain why they decided to do so, and is allowed to remove a juror for arbitrary reasons. A lawyer may, for example, use a peremptory challenge to remove a juror because they do not like the juror's haircut.
This questioning of the potential jurors is known as voir dire (to speak the truth). If either lawyer believes there is information that suggests a juror is prejudiced about the case, he or she can ask the judge to dismiss that juror for cause.
In voir dire, the attorneys question prospective jurors to determine whether they are biased or have any connection with a party to the action or with a prospective witness.
Do any of you know, or think you might know, the plaintiff, defendant, or any member of his/her family, or have had dealings with this corporation? 5. Have any of you ever seen, heard, or read anything about this case, or have any of you ever heard anyone express an opinion about it?
peremptory challenge. Dismissal of a prospective juror by either the prosecution or the defense for unexplained, discretionary reasons. pro se. To present one's own defense in a criminal trial: self-representation. proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Selecting the jury is the only time an attorney has the opportunity to discover the life experiences, biases, beliefs, and attitudes of the people who will decide their case. The last thing any attorney wants is for bias to come out during the trial. Thus, how lawyers pick jurors is an essential indicator of the experience and knowledge ...
That’s why it’s so important for attorneys to carefully listen and talk to their potential jurors to get a feel for how the individual case will be viewed.
The goal is to remove jurors who won’t identify with the plaintiff and what they have suffered at the hands of the defendant.
What most prosecution cases don’t want are jurors that have connections to big corporations or insurance companies . They don’t want small business owners, HR personnel, or people who have been involved on the prosecution side of their own personal injury cases. In addition, you don’t want people who favor tort reform, or are vocally opposed to “frivolous lawsuits.”
Very often, union employees make for good prosecution jurors as they are used to fighting injustice. People who are prone to look unfavorably on big corporations are good for cases like product liability and trucking accident cases.
Picking the right jury is the difference between winning and losing a case. The greatest mistake that an attorney will make is trying to find a jury that’s biased towards their side, rather than trying to find one that’s as impartial as possible. Trying to find a jury that’s anything less than fair can be a fast path to losing a case , and a good lawyer knows this.
If the attorney is doing too much of the talking, that’s a real problem. You don’t learn anything by listening to yourself. That’s why attorneys will keep their questions brief and to the point, and will follow up to guide a conversation with the juror.
Jury service is a way for U.S. citizens to participate in the judicial process.
The judge determines the appropriate law that should be applied to the case and the jury finds the facts in the case based on what is presented to them during the proceedings. At the end of a trial, the judge instructs the jury on the applicable law.
The jury must come to a unanimous decision unless specified otherwise. The standard of proof is a “preponderance of the evidence,” or “more true than not.”. Settlement negotiations reduce the need for juries in civil cases.
A unanimous decision must be reached before a defendant is found “guilty.”. The government must prove the crime was committed “beyond a reasonable doubt.”. Guilty pleas and plea negotiations reduce the need for juries in criminal cases.
There are two types of judicial proceedings in the federal courts that use juries. Criminal trial: An individual is accused of committing a crime that is considered against society as a whole. Twelve people, and alternates, make up a criminal jury.
Members of the panel who know any person involved in the case, who have information about the case, or who may have strong prejudices about the people or issues involved in the case , typically will be excused by the judge. The attorneys also may exclude a certain number of jurors without giving a reason.
Being summoned for jury service does not guarantee that a person will actually serve on a jury. When a jury is needed for a trial, the group of qualified jurors is taken to the courtroom where the trial will take place.
So what happens when you are called for jury duty? First off, you will receive a jury summons. The jury summons will require that you appear for jury duty at the courthouse at a certain time and place. When you arrive at the courthouse there likely will be a jury assembly area.
This group is called the jury venire or jury panel. The bailiff will take you to a courtroom and seat you in a certain order based on your juror number. You may even be given a card with your juror number on it. The purpose of this is for the lawyers, the judge and the court reporter to identify you during jury selection.
The juror groups will be assigned and sent to specific courtrooms for jury selection. You will be divided into groups of anywhere between 24 to 60 possible jurors. This group is called the jury venire or jury panel. The bailiff will take you to a courtroom and seat you in a certain order based on your juror number. You may even be given a card with your juror number on it. The purpose of this is for the lawyers, the judge and the court reporter to identify you during jury selection.
Most of the time, the judge will allow the lawyers about an hour each to conduct voir dire. When it is complete, the lawyers may bring in some of the potential jurors for a private discussion with the judge. This happens when a juror indicates that he would like to speak for privately with the judge and lawyers. After that, the lawyers will exercise their juror strikes so that the panel can be reduced to the actual members of the jury.
The purpose of this is to ensure that you meet the requirements to perform jury duty. This may include juror qualifications such as ensuring that you reside in the county, have not performed jury duty within a specific time period, and have not been convicted of a felony.
Appearing for jury duty and serving on a jury is both important and rewarding. When you serve on jury duty, you are helping to resolve disputes and serve justice. On jury duty, you are performing an important role in our government.
The quickest way to guarantee that you will serve on the jury will be to keep quiet and not say a word !
One common question presented to jurors is, “Are there any religious beliefs that prevent you from passing judgment on another person?” Frederick says this is to weed out people whose faith might impede their ability to view a case objectively .
Attorneys don’t get to pick their jurors. Instead, using a mixture of intense questioning, keen observation, and stereotyping, they get to eliminate people they think would hurt their case. “It’s not like a baseball team where you can choose your team members,” says Jeffrey Frederick, Director of Jury Research Services at the National Legal Research Group and author of Mastering Voir Dire and Jury Selection. “It’s not who I want, it’s who I don’t want. What we try to do is think of what backgrounds, life experiences, cognitive styles, opinions, and values jurors might have that would make them less receptive to our case.” Clues like demographics and personality can improve a lawyer’s chance of predicting a juror’s stance on a verdict by up to 15 percent. Here are a few things lawyers take into consideration when trying to figure you out.
Open and receptive jurors, according to the Synchronics Group Trial Consultants, will have hair that is “casual and naturally flowing, rather than highly styled or gelled or plastered to the head … Beards and mustaches will be natural looking, rather than designed and sculpted.” The old adage says you can’t judge a book by its cover, but attorneys will certainly try.
The plaintiff attorney or prosecutor will generally look for people more inclined to trust authority.
One quick way to get dismissed from a jury, according to Tom King , a former Deputy Prosecutor in Indiana, is to voice strong opinions about the legal system: “Say, ‘I’ve read about these criminal prosecutions where the police and the prosecutors made up evidence and I just don’t think it’s a fair system.’”
Indeed, research shows that if you don’t vibe well with an attorney, you’re more likely to decide against their argument. “One attorney told me, 'If I can tell they don’t like me, I get rid of them,’” King says.
Leaders, contrarians, and independent thinkers can be pivotal in a verdict. These people have the potential to rally the rest of the group behind a unanimous decision, which is great for the plaintiff or the prosecutor.
To come to step four (going to court when sessions begin), you will need to show that you’re capable of giving unbiased judgment by filling out a question naire.
When a court needs a jury for a case, regardless of whether it’s a state or federal court, registered voters and driver’s license owners from that district are randomly selected and summoned for further screening.
Most employees don’t know that the law is on their side—when you send a notice to the employer, they have to respect your jury leave and let you attend court without any repercussions, regardless of how many times you’re summoned.
Although the government gives money to jurors, this is not a job—it’s mandatory for all citizens, and you’d be wise not to skip jury duty.
Alternate jurors are selected in some cases to take the place of jurors who may become ill during the trial. Alternate jurors hear the evidence just as the other jurors do, but they don’t participate in the deliberations unless they replace an original juror.
Once impaneled, the jurors’ role is to listen to the evidence conscientiously and not draw premature conclusions. They are instructed by the judge not to discuss the case with outsiders or each other (until deliberations). They generally do not have the right to ask questions of witnesses, but some judges permit jurors to submit written questions for the judge and lawyers to consider. (The lawyers have a right to object to these questions, just as they do to questions posed by lawyers during the trial.) If appropriate, the questions may be asked.
Steps in a Trial 1 In civil cases, especially in courts of limited jurisdiction, the standard size in many jurisdictions is becoming six, which can be increased by stipulation of both parties. 2 In misdemeanor cases there are sometimes fewer than twelve jurors, though in serious criminal cases twelve jurors are generally required. 3 The old requirement that juries be unanimous is also changing. In misdemeanor and civil cases particularly, states often provide for verdicts based on the agreement of three-fourths or five-sixths of the jurors.
Peremptory challenges are limited to a certain number determined by the kind of lawsuit being tried. They can’t be used to discriminate on the basis of race or sex. When both parties have agreed upon a jury, the jurors are sworn in to try the case by the court clerk. Those not selected are excused.
In many jurisdictions, jury selection begins with the court clerk's calling twelve people on the jury list and asking them to take a place in the jury box. The judge usually makes a brief statement explaining what kind of case is to be tried and inquiring whether there is any reason the potential jurors cannot serve.
In civil cases, especially in courts of limited jurisdiction, the standard size in many jurisdictions is becoming six, which can be increased by stipulation of both parties.
Each request will be considered by the judge and may or may not be allowed. In addition to challenges for cause, each lawyer has a specific number of peremptory challenges. These challenges permit a lawyer to excuse a potential juror without stating a cause.