Chicago, Illinois. It’s your first trial and the parties have already given their opening statements. Now, it’s time to question your first witness. Depending upon whether you are the prosecutor/plaintiff’s attorney or the defense attorney, the questions you will be asking your first witness will be on either direct or cross-examination.
impeachment - (1) The process of calling something into question, as in "impeaching the testimony of a witness." (2) The constitutional process whereby the House of Representatives …
When the defense attorney completes questioning of the plaintiff's witness, and plaintiff's attorney asks further questions of that same witness, it is. ... After an opposing attorney does …
the plaintiff's attorney questions the witness who was questioned by the defendant's attorney. Which of the following statements is true of the plaintiff's case? the defendant's attorney can …
Cross-Examination When the lawyer for the plaintiff or the government has finished questioning a witness, the lawyer for the defendant may then cross-examine the witness. Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination.
Cross Examination: The questions which a lawyer puts to the party or a witness on the opposing side. This is designed to test whether the witness is telling the truth.
Each party to a criminal trial has the chance to call witnesses on his behalf. The party who calls the witness to testify goes first and asks the witness questions. This is called direct examination.
n. 1) the questioning of a witness by an attorney. Direct examination is interrogation by the attorney who called the witness, and cross-examination is questioning by the opposing attorney.
Steps in a Trial Lawyers for the plaintiff or the government begin the presentation of evidence by calling witnesses . The questions they ask of the witnesses are direct examination. Direct examination may elicit both direct and circumstantial evidence.
Oral arguments are spoken presentations to a judge or appellate court by a lawyer (or parties when representing themselves) of the legal reasons why they should prevail.
You might often hear about "the prosecution's case" — that's their evidence. Or you might hear about a "prosecution witness" — someone who is supposed to tell jury members something that will convince them of the defendant's guilt. Definitions of prosecution.
A prosecution witness will usually only be called to give evidence at trial where the defendant disputes the version of events they have set out in their written witness statement or video recorded evidence.
The Judge or Magistrate will explain the law and procedures to the defendant/accused but they will not help them to run their case. If the person asks questions that are insulting or irrelevant, the prosecutor can object. The Judge or Magistrate ensures that the defendant/accused behaves in an appropriate manner.
Voir dire (/ˈvwɑːr dɪər/; often /vɔɪr daɪər/; from an Anglo-Norman phrase meaning literally "to see to say" or better translated "see what will be said") is a legal phrase for a variety of procedures connected with jury trials.
: a preliminary examination to determine the competency of a witness or juror.
French for "to speak the truth." The process through which potential jurors from the venire are questioned by either the judge or a lawyer to determine their suitability for jury service. Also the preliminary questioning of witnesses (especially experts) to determine their competence to testify.
A witness is someone who has personal knowledge of a situation that may be helpful to the jury in deciding the outcome of the case. This personal knowledge is shared with the judge and jury through a series of questions between the witness and the plaintiff’s attorney or prosecutor. This is called direct examination.
Expert witness testimony – Testimony of a person who is qualified to help the jury or judge understand specialized details of the case. Expert witnesses are asked to express their professional opinion during the trial.
A criminal defendant who is found guilty, or who voluntarily pleads guilty, is scheduled for a sentencing hearing approximately 90 days after the verdict. This gives the U.S. probation officer time to research and prepare a pre-sentence report for the judge. This report is used by the judge to determine punishment for the crime. The judge’s primary goal is to order punishment that is suitable for the crime committed, but no more than needed. Other goals include keeping the community safe, deterring similar crimes in the future, and rehabilitating the individual to prevent them from committing future crimes. The judge also wants to avoid unfair differences in sentences for similar crimes committed by different defendants. Types of punishment can include imprisonment, house arrest, supervised release, substance abuse treatment, counseling, educational training, payment of fines and/or restitution. When assigning the appropriate punishment, the judge uses the advice of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines . These guidelines take into account the seriousness of the offense, and the criminal history of the person. For some types of crimes, there is a mandatory minimum sentence set by federal law. In many cases, there may be a term of imprisonment, followed by a period of supervised release . During that term of release, the offender will be supervised by a U.S. probation officer while living back in the community, and will be required to adhere to various conditions.
Actually, the most common type of evidence is provided by witness testimony . Often witness testimony may be the only evidence presented. It’s up to the jury, or the judge in a bench trial, to decide the true facts from what is said by each party and each witness.
Types of punishment can include imprisonment, house arrest, supervised release, substance abuse treatment, counseling, educational training, payment of fines and/or restitution.
Physical evidence – Physical objects and documents can be used by either side to prove or disprove issues. An example would be DNA, fingerprints, or a photograph.
Evidence. Objections. Evidence is used by the parties to prove or disprove unresolved issues in the case. There are rules in place to govern how evidence is collected, what evidence can be admitted in the case, and how the judge and jury may consider evidence to render a decision.
Use concise, leading questions that for the most part elicit yes or no responses. Organize your questions so that they build to an important point. The last question of a series of questions should make the point very clear. Stop for a moment to gather your thoughts and to let the jury have an opportunity to appreciate the point and its significance. Then move on to your next point. Keep the witness guessing. Move from point to point in an order that keeps your thought process hidden. If the witness does not know where you are going with your questioning, you are more likely to catch the witness off guard and get the answer you desire.
You are calling this witness because she supports at least some, if not all, aspects of your case. Therefore, you want the jury to see this witness and hear what she has to say.
First, leading questions are not allowed on direct examination except in limited circumstances such as in the case of an adverse or hostile witness or a very young witness. Second, the use of leading questions will have the negative effect of shifting the jury’s focus from the witness and her answers to you and your questions. Finally, the use of leading questions reduces the credibility of the witness. If you use leading questions on a regular basis, it will be as if you are testifying, not the witness. Even if opposing counsel and the judge allow you to use leading questions, the jury will not appreciate this approach and will no doubt question the credibility of the witness.
You have called this witness to testify on behalf of your client because this witness can help you establish the elements you need to win your case. Identify the points you want to make and formulate your questions in a manner which allow you to get to those points as quickly as possible. Be sure to stop once you have developed those points sufficiently. Do not bore or confuse the jury with unimportant or irrelevant points.
Cross-examination has essentially two purposes. The first and primary purpose of cross-examination is to elicit testimony that supports your case . The second purpose, which is discussed in more detail below, is to attack the credibility of the witness or the witness’s testimony.
Many attorneys feel uncomfortable with silence between a witness’s answer and their next question. As a result, those attorneys use verbal crutches such as “um” and “and” to fill this void with sound. In reality, when these sounds are used on a regular basis they only serve to distract the jury. Remember, moments of silence between a witness’s answer and your next question are acceptable. In fact, these moments of silence allow the jury to absorb the witness’s testimony and its significance.
Again, keep in mind that the witness you are cross-examining will try to help your opponent whenever possible. Therefore, if you do not know the answer to a question, do not ask the question unless any answer the witness gives will be favorable to you.
The plaintiff initially decides where to bring the suit, but in some cases, the defendant can seek to change the court. (2) The geographic area over which the court has authority to decide cases. A federal court in one state, for example, can usually only decide a case that arose from actions in that state.
To make such a request is "to appeal" or "to take an appeal.". Both the plaintiff and the defendant can appeal, and the party doing so is called the appellant. Appeals can be made for a variety of reasons including improper procedure and asking the court to change its interpretation of the law.
Federal criminal juries consist of 12 persons. Federal civil juries consist of six persons. plaintiff - The person who files the complaint in a civil lawsuit. plea - In a criminal case, the defendant's statement pleading "guilty" or "not guilty" in answer to the charges in open court.
bail - Security given for the release of a criminal defendant or witness from legal custody (usually in the form of money) to secure his/her appearance on the day and time appointed.
A. acquittal - Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. affidavit - A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making it. Affidavits must be notarized or administered by an officer of the court with such authority.
appellate - About appeals; an appellate court has the power to review the judgment of another lower court or tribunal. arraignment - A proceeding in which an individual who is accused of committing a crime is brought into court, told of the charges, and asked to plead guilty or not guilty.
charge to the jury - The judge's instructions to the jury concerning the law that applies to the facts of the case on trial. chief judge - The judge who has primary responsibility for the administration of a court. The chief judge also decides cases, and the choice of chief judges is determined by seniority.
When a group of plaintiffs with common claims collectively bring a lawsuit against a defendant, it is known as consolidation.
The paperwork that is filed with the court to initiate and respond to a lawsuit is referred to as the pleadings.
A group of plaintiffs collectively brings a lawsuit against a defendant.
Upon a request, a plaintiff typically receives at least one judicial extension of the applicable statute of limitations period.
Interventions are written questions submitted by one party to a lawsuit to the other party.
An answer is the defendant's written response to a plaintiff's complaint that is filed with the court and served on the plaintiff.
plaintiff must bring a lawsuit against a defendant.
After the defendant's attorney completes his or her questions, the plaintiff's attorney can ask questions of the plaintiff's witness.
A plaintiff files a complaint in the proper court. The court then issues a summons. However, the defendant does not answer the complaint.
After an arbitration hearing is complete, the arbitrator reaches a decision and issues an award. The decision and award of the arbitrator can be appealed to the courts.
One of the parties registers her dispute with an online service and then notifies the other party by e-mail of the registration of the dispute. The registering party submits an amount she is willing to accept or pay to the other party. The other party is afforded the opportunity to accept the offer. If that party accepts the offer, a settlement has been reached; however, the other party may return a counteroffer. The process continues until a settlement is reached or one or both parties remove themselves from the online process.
In order to reach a voluntary settlement of their dispute, the parties decide to engage in discussions to try to reach an agreeable solution. During the proceedings, the parties usually make offers and counteroffers to one another. The parties or their attorneys also may provide information to the other side in order to assist the other side in reaching an amicable settlement.
Two parties are engaged in a legal dispute. In order to reach a settlement of their dispute, the parties choose an impartial third party to hear and decide the dispute.
After a witness has been sworn in, the plaintiff's attorney questions the witness. Documents and other evidence can be introduced through each witness.