The closing speech is your final attempt to address the court. It should integrate the evidence the court has heard with your theory of the case and present your underpinning argument. In your final speech you should rebut or explain the evidence that weakens your case and explain how the law applies.
Full Answer
The closing statement is the attorney’s final statement to the jury before deliberation begins. The attorney reiterates the important arguments, summarizes what the evidence has and has not shown, and requests jury to consider the evidence and apply the law in his or her client’s favor.
The closing speech is the final attempt to address the court. It needs to integrate the evidence that has been heard with your theory of the case. Both the Prosecution and the Defence have the opportunity to give a final speech. The closing speech should be short, but long enough to cover the ground and make any final impact.
Nov 11, 2013 · For defense counsel, closing argument is the last chance to remind the jury of the prosecution's high burden of proof and to persuade the jury that there is, at a minimum, reasonable doubt as to the defendant's guilt. Typical Closing Arguments. An effective closing argument ties together all the pieces of a trial and tells a compelling story.
Every trial proceeds in basically the same way. Both parties are seated in the courtroom. In a criminal trial, this includes the prosecuting attorney for the government, as well as the defendant and their defense attorney.. In civil cases, both the plaintiff and defendant, and their respective attorneys, if any, need to be present.. The attorneys will begin by making their opening …
If opening a case you should always introduce yourself and the other side to the Court. For example: Your Honour/Sir/Madam/Master I appear in this case for the Claimant and my friend Mr/Miss/Mrs. appears for the Defendant.
The opening speech involves taking the judge through the statements of the case and providing an outline and guide to your case. It should provide a summary of the evidence that will be produced and should not go into any details in relation to the content of the testimony. The opening speech will detail the issues to be decided and you should provide a summary of the facts that you seek to establish. However, in the county court the defendant’s solicitor can make the opening speech and if they do they are not entitled to make a closing speech, without the leave of the court. You should hand the judge a bundle of documents and take him or her through the chronology of the matter to provide the judge with a picture of the events in the case. The opening speech should be lively and interesting to engage the court. You should use plain language and use eye contact to build rapport with the judge. You should refer to your client by his or her name in order to personalise them, and refer to the other side, for example as the ‘respondent/defendant’ etc.
A closing statement is a statement made at the end of a debate, or more often, a legal trial, delivered by a representative of each side of the case or debate. It is the last chance for both parties of said debate or trial to state their argument, and hopefully affect the verdict or outcome in their favor.
In the legal sense, a closing statement is delivered by the attorney on either side of the case: the prosecuting attorney and the defense attorney. If the defendant or plaintiff, the person or company on each side of the case, is unrepresented, meaning without a lawyer to argue on his or her behalf, he or she has the option to deliver ...
He told the judge and jury, “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”. This phrase is now incredibly famous. Cochran, like Atticus Finch, developed a statement that supported the innocence of his client, using the parts of the trial that cast the most doubt on the prosecution’s charges.
In the novel, Atticus Finch, a southern lawyer, must defend a black man against charges of rape and assault. As it turns out, the hand with which Tom, the defendant, supposedly hit a white woman is useless to him, making it impossible that he is guilty of injuring her.
In real life, closing arguments are a way for the attorneys to pull together all the evidence for the jury —they're intended to appeal to jurors' reason, not just their passion.
An effective closing argument ties together all the pieces of a trial and tells a compelling story. Generally, closing arguments should include: any reasonable inferences that can be draw from the evidence. an attack on any holes or weaknesses in the other side's case.
The goal of the defense lawyer's closing argument is to tie together the defense's evidence in a strong and persuasive manner for the judge or jury. During closing arguments, the defense lawyer should: 1 Humanize the defendant: use the defendant's name, share positive facts about his/her life, help the judge or jury connect with the defendant; 2 Discuss the relevant law to the defendant's best advantage in clear, concise language that the jury can understand; 3 Listen carefully to the prosecution's statements and witnesses in order to exploit any weaknesses; 4 Address and refute each of the prosecution's claims against the defendant; 5 Close with a strong repetition of the key theme and a request to the judge or jury for a verdict of not guilty.
The purpose of the closing argument is to summarize the defense’s case – explaining the significance of the evidence, presenting a positive theory, engaging the judge and jurors intellectually and emotionally, and explaining why the defendant is innocent. The defense should also point out the bias and inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case.
It is also persuasive to emphasize for the judge or jury the importance of the role they fulfill in the system. Flattery is a quick way to win votes to your side.
Themes are ways of neatly connecting the defense's arguments throughout the case. A good theme can persuade a judge or jury or aid in recall of key facts. Focus on finding a short, memorable phrase that encompasses the central emotion or theory of the case which can be referred to throughout the trial.
Reasonable doubt as meaning at least "firmly convinced" of guilt - Whatever you may think about what reasonable doubt means, I submit to you that it means, at least, that you, as a responsible juror, cannot convict a person of a crime until you are firmly convinced, personally, of the defendant's guilt.
1. Opening Statements. Every trial proceeds in basically the same way. Both parties are seated in the courtroom. In a criminal trial, this includes the prosecuting attorney for the government, as well as the defendant and their defense attorney . In civil cases, both the plaintiff and defendant, and their respective attorneys, if any, ...
A witness is someone who has personal knowledge of a situation that may be helpful to the jury in deciding the outcome of the case. This personal knowledge is shared with the judge and jury through a series of questions between the witness and the plaintiff’s attorney or prosecutor. This is called direct examination.
Actually, the most common type of evidence is provided by witness testimony . Often witness testimony may be the only evidence presented. It’s up to the jury, or the judge in a bench trial, to decide the true facts from what is said by each party and each witness.
Physical evidence – Physical objects and documents can be used by either side to prove or disprove issues. An example would be DNA, fingerprints, or a photograph. All witnesses must swear or affirm that their testimony will be truthful.
Evidence. Objections. Evidence is used by the parties to prove or disprove unresolved issues in the case. There are rules in place to govern how evidence is collected, what evidence can be admitted in the case, and how the judge and jury may consider evidence to render a decision.
A criminal defendant who is found guilty, or who voluntarily pleads guilty, is scheduled for a sentencing hearing approximately 90 days after the verdict. This gives the U.S. probation officer time to research and prepare a pre-sentence report for the judge. This report is used by the judge to determine punishment for the crime. The judge’s primary goal is to order punishment that is suitable for the crime committed, but no more than needed. Other goals include keeping the community safe, deterring similar crimes in the future, and rehabilitating the individual to prevent them from committing future crimes. The judge also wants to avoid unfair differences in sentences for similar crimes committed by different defendants. Types of punishment can include imprisonment, house arrest, supervised release, substance abuse treatment, counseling, educational training, payment of fines and/or restitution. When assigning the appropriate punishment, the judge uses the advice of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines . These guidelines take into account the seriousness of the offense, and the criminal history of the person. For some types of crimes, there is a mandatory minimum sentence set by federal law. In many cases, there may be a term of imprisonment, followed by a period of supervised release . During that term of release, the offender will be supervised by a U.S. probation officer while living back in the community, and will be required to adhere to various conditions.
They are just statements, however, and cannot be considered as evidence by the jury. The side bringing the case is the side that bears the burden of proof, and thus always goes first. This is the prosecuting attorney in a criminal case, or the plaintiff in a civil case.
An annotated text of the version delivered by Gregory Peck in the film adaptation of To Kill a Mockingbird (1962) can be found here.
Thomas Jefferson once said that all men are created equal, a phrase that the Yankees and the distaff side of the Executive branch in Washington are fond of hurling at us. There is a tendency in this year of grace, 1935, for certain people to use this phrase of context, to satisfy all conditions.