what is the authority allowing an attorney general directive

What is the Attorney General Law Enforcement Directive 2004-4?

AG Directive 2021-1 | Feb 22, 2021. Directive instructs state, county, and municipal prosecutors to dismiss charges pending as of February 22, 2021 for any marijuana offense that is no longer illegal under state law. 2020 Attorney General law Enforcement Directives. AG Directive 2020-14 | …

What is the AAG directive for 2021?

Apr 12, 2021 · Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs, Dale Marshall. (FP) Attorney General Dale Marshall is urging Barbadians to read the Emergency Management (COVID-19) (Curfew) Directives in their entirety, in order to have a greater understanding as to what is allowed whenever directives are issued.. He was a guest on the latest COVID Queries televised …

What is the new AG directive 2020-7?

This Directive is issued pursuant to the Attorney General’s authority to ensure the uniform and efficient enforcement of the laws and administration of criminal justice throughout the State. This Directive imposes limitations on law enforcement agencies and officials that may be more restrictive than the

What is the directive to dismiss charges pending?

• Attorney General Directive 2016-3, a Directive Revising the Supplemental Policy on ... allowing law enforcement to effectively do their jobs ... This Directive is issued pursuant to the Attorney General’s authority to ensure the uniform and efficient enforcement of the laws and

What is the Attorney General's directive for BWC?

Attorney General Directive 2015-1, issued almost six years ago, provided an initial set of guidelines for the implementation of BWC programs across New Jersey. Since that time, law enforcement agencies, county prosecutors and the Office of the Attorney General, have learned valuable lessons on the best practices to be implemented in order to utilize BWCs to build community trust, respect citizen privacy, and maximize the effectiveness of these important tools to promote public safety. The Legislature recently deemed it appropriate to codify many of the provisions of Directive 2015-1, while mandating the use of BWCs by all “uniformed patrol officers” and requiring the implementation of a number of BWC-related provisions.

What happens if a law enforcement officer fails to record?

If a law enforcement officer, employee, or agent fails to adhere to the recording or retention requirements contained in this Policy, intentionally interferes with a BWC’s ability to accurately capture audio or video recordings, or violates any other provision of this policy, the officer, employee, or agent shall be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, in addition to any judicial consequences outlined in the law.

What is a BWC?

The increased use of body worn cameras (BWCs) by police officers has profoundly impacted law enforcement nationwide. Indeed, since the first cameras were activated in New Jersey in 2015, there has seen a steady increase in the number of agencies that have equipped their officers with them. While initially voluntary, many departments have established BWC programs as a way to increase accountability and transparency, while providing protection for officers who engage with the public on a daily basis.

What is the purpose of the BWC?

1.1 The policies and standards established in this Policy are designed to help police departments achieve an optimal balance between potentially competing interests. For example, it is necessary to balance the need to promote police accountability and transparency on the one hand, against the need to respect the privacy interests of persons whose images and home interiors will be captured in a BWC recording on the other. So too, it is necessary to balance the benefits achieved by electronically recording evidence that might help to solve a crime and successfully prosecute an offender against the costs incurred if a BWC were to chill a victim or witness from providing a BWC-equipped officer with information necessary to solve a crime and convict the offender.

How long is a BWC recording good for?

A BWC recording shall be retained for not less than 180 days from the date it was recorded, but shall be subject to additional retention periods as required in Sections 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4.

What is BWC 9.1?

9. 1 Procedures to Protect Integrity of BWC Recordings. Every department shall establish and maintain a system and procedures to ensure the integrity and proper handling and storage of all BWC recordings. This system shall include provisions to:

Can law enforcement access BWC recordings?

BWC recordings shall not be divulged or used by any law enforcement agency for any commercial or other non-law enforcement purpose. Access to and use of a stored BWC recording is permitted only:

What is the Attorney General's advisory panel?

3.1 Attorney General’s Advisory Panel on Conducted Energy and Less-Lethal Devices. The Attorney General will establish the Attorney General Advisory Panel for Conducted Energy and Less-Lethal Devices (Panel). The panel shall consist of subject matter experts from the New Jersey State Police, the Division of Criminal Justice, the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability, the Police Training Commission, the New Jersey State Association of Chiefs of Police, the County Prosecutors’ Office Chiefs Association, the County Prosecutors Association of New Jersey, the Sheriff’s Association of New Jersey, and other law enforcement officers and member(s) of the community appointed by the Attorney General or their designee.

What is the authority of a law enforcement officer?

3.1 A law enforcement officer has the authority, at all times, to attempt the stop of any person suspected of having committed any criminal offense or traffic violation. When the violator does not submit to the officer’s lawful authority and bring the vehicle to a stop, the officer must determine whether to pursue that violator by continuing to attempt to stop the violator utilizing pursuit driving as defined herein. The officer's decision to pursue should always be undertaken with an awareness of the degree of risk to which the officer exposes law enforcement and the community by engaging in a vehicular pursuit. The officer must always weigh the need for immediate apprehension against the risk created by the pursuit.

What is the use of force policy?

Notably, the Use of Force Policy incorporates some new limitations on their use. It prohibits their use against those who are resisting arrest, but do not pose a threat to an officer or someone else. It also prohibits the visible presence of canines for crowd control purposes at peaceful demonstrations and their deployment against a crowd, except to respond to a threat of death or serious bodily injury to a member of the public or to an officer. Canines may continue to be used for explosive detection or similar security sweeps at such gatherings. There is, however, additional work to be done and information to be gathered about the use of canines, including from the Use of Force Portal. Today, I

Why is it important to conduct a thorough and meaningful review of vehicular pursuit incidents?

12.1 Thorough and meaningful review of vehicular pursuit incidents is vital to ensuring the safety of law enforcement officers and the public. Every vehicular pursuit must undergo the following procedures for a meaningful command-level review pursuant to a written policy established by the law enforcement executive:

What is the Fourth Amendment?

Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989). This provision, however, provides a constitutional “floor” for officer use of force that all officers must meet. The Use of Force Policy sets standards that go beyond the minimum constitutional requirements set forth in Graham.

How long does it take to complete a vehicular pursuit report?

The report shall be completed by the officer within 24 hours of the vehicular pursuit and preferably before the end the shift in which the pursuit occurred. If the officer involved in the pursuit is unable to complete the report within 24 hours, it should be completed as soon the officer is able to do so, or by a supervising officer within 48 hours in accordance with a written policy to be established by the department or agency.

Which class of law enforcement officer is authorized to carry and use a conducted energy or a less-lethal device

4.1 The law enforcement executive of each agency shall determine which officers, including Class II and Class III Special Law Enforcement Officers, shall be authorized to carry and use a conducted energy or a less-lethal device or ammunition. Class I Special Law Enforcement Officers shall not be authorized.

Who is immune from the Act?

Health care providers who take actions based on the Act are immune from claims that the actions were unauthorized. Health care agents and surrogates who follow the Act when they authorize the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining procedures are immune from liability.

What happens if a patient has not picked a health care agent?

If a patient has not picked a health care agent, or if no health care agent is available, and the patient is no longer able to make health care decisions personally, as determined by the attending physician and a consulting physician or nurse practitioner,

What is a palliative care protocol?

The Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems has developed a palliative care protocol for use by emergency medical services personnel. Only the MOLST form, the previous EMS/DNR form, a copy of it, or an approved bracelet or necklace, or an oral order from a physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner on the scene or through online medical direction will be acknowledged by emergency medical services personnel. When other health care professionals treat a patient with an EMS/DNR order or a MOLST form containing a DNR order, they must follow the DNR order if the patient has a cardiopulmonary arrest.

Does the Health Care Decisions Act affect informed consent?

The Health Care Decisions Act does not affect the doctrine of informed consent, which applies to treatment issues in the current clinical context. A patient with capacity has the right to decide these issues, including whether life-sustaining procedures should be used.