what is required for a district attorney to win a criminal conviction?

by Preston Friesen 6 min read

If you've already been charged and given a court date, it means that the District Attorney has evidence against you that he plans to use in the process of prosecuting you. One of the first steps that a criminal attorney will take is to request the discovery, or evidence, that the District Attorney plans to use against you.

Full Answer

How does a defense attorney work in a criminal case?

They involve exposing legal flaws and doubts about any crime elements the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt in order to win a conviction. If you’re facing prison or harsh penalties, it is key to consult a top criminal lawyer. No matter how smart you are, it is nearly impossible to competently defend yourself.

When can the prosecutor not defend a conviction?

 · The state (aka, "prosecution" or "district attorney") must satisfy the burden of proof necessary for a criminal prosecution. It is important to distinguish the three burdens of proof in court proceedings to understand how much evidence the state must produce to convict a person of a criminal charge. Preponderance of the Evidence

What do prosecutors have to do with the law?

In a criminal case, after conviction and sentencing, a defendant has the opportunity to file an appeal of the conviction and sentence. If the conviction resulted from a guilty plea, the defendant may have to ask for leave to appeal, meaning making a request for permission to appeal the conviction. If the conviction results from a trial, the ...

When does the prosecutor need to advise the court about facts?

lack of evidence to prove the defendant committed the crime. an unavailable witness who is necessary to prove defendant committed the crime, and. loss of evidence necessary to prove defendant committed the crime. Occasionally, cases are dismissed after the defendant has gone to trial, lost, and won an appeal.

image

What is the most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute?

The most important factor in deciding whether to prosecute is: if there is sufficient evidence for conviction.

Why do prosecutors sometimes choose not to prosecute?

Prosecutors may decline to press charges because they think it unlikely that a conviction will result. No matter what the prosecutor's personal feelings about the case, the prosecutor needs legally admissible evidence sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

What do prosecutors have which gives them power to decide what charges to file and whether or not to negotiate a plea agreement?

Prosecutorial discretion is when a prosecutor has the power to decide whether or not to charge a person for a crime, and which criminal charges to file.

Which factors would be ethical for a prosecutor to consider in making charging decisions?

Which factors would be ethical for a prosecutor to consider in making charging decisions? The quality of the evidence; The ability to obtain a conviction; The severity of the crime.

How do you convince a prosecutor to drop charges?

There are several ways for criminal defendants to convince a prosecutor to drop their charges. They can present exculpatory evidence, complete a pretrial diversion program, agree to testify against another defendant, take a plea deal, or show that their rights were violated by the police.

Do police need evidence to charge?

1. The evidential test. Before charging, the CPS must be satisfied that there is enough evidence. This means there must be a realistic prospect of conviction in relation to each accused and for each and every charge.

What percentage of plea bargains are innocent?

Indeed, of the more than 300 people definitively exonerated by the Innocence Project using DNA evidence, some 11 percent pleaded guilty to crimes they did not commit since 1989. The National Registry of Exonerations puts the total number at 20 percent since 1989.

Which standard must be met to prove that the defendant is guilty in criminal cases?

"Beyond a reasonable doubt" is the highest legal standard. This is the standard the U.S. Constitution requires the government to meet in order to prove a defendant guilty of a crime.

What are the 3 types of plea bargains?

– Discusses the three main areas of negotiations involving plea bargains:charge bargaining,sentence bargaining, and fact bargaining.

What factors may influence the prosecutors decision when filing charges?

The decision to prosecute is based on the following factors:The sufficiency of the evidence linking the suspect to the offense.The seriousness of the offense.The size of the court's caseload.The need to conserve prosecutorial resources for more serious cases.The availability of alternatives to formal prosecution.More items...

What is the most important factor a prosecutor considered when deciding on criminal prosecution?

3Of the many duties and responsibilities of the prosecutor, the charging power is the most important and is the essence of her control over the entire system. Prosecutors decide whether to charge an individual with a criminal offense, and what the charge should be.

What is the most common charge against prosecutors?

According to the text, the most common charge leveled against prosecutors is: failure to disclose evidence.

What does a plaintiff have to prove in a civil case?

The plaintiff, in a civil case, must prove that their version of the facts are more likely to have occurred than the defendant's version.

What is the highest burden of proof in a court case?

The highest burden of proof in any court proceeding is proof "beyond a reasonable doubt ." When a person stands trial, the jury must begin with the assumption that the accusations against defendant are false. A juror can only find in favor for the government at the end of the trial if the prosecution has erased all reasonable doubts about the defendant's innocence from the juror's mind.

Is clear and convincing evidence a burden of proof?

Clear and convincing evidence is a high burden of proof, however, it is not the highest burden of proof. That belongs to the burden in a criminal proceeding, beyond a reasonable doubt...

When can a defendant appeal a conviction?

May 8, 2018. In a criminal case, after conviction and sentencing, a defendant has the opportunity to file an appeal of the conviction and sentence. If the conviction resulted from a guilty plea, the defendant may have to ask for leave to appeal, meaning making a request for permission to appeal the conviction.

What happens if you are convicted of a federal crime?

If you are convicted following a trial in federal court, your first appeal will be to the federal Court of Appeals, and your case will never be heard before a state court. A defendant who is unsuccessful with an appeal to the Court of Appeals may seek leave to file an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court.

What is substantive due process?

Substantive Due Process - Substantive due process represents the broad notion that a person shall not be arbitrarily deprived of his life, liberty or property. If a person is deprived of the opportunity to appeal a court decision, or is convicted when the prosecutor fails to produce exculpatory evidence that tends to prove his innocence, the defendant's substantive due process rights may have been violated.

What is standard of review in court?

A standard of review defines the burden a party faces in order to obtain relief from a trial court error, and the burden imposed on the appellant may be very difficult to satisfy. In most cases the appellate court will issue a written opinion that summarizes the issues in the case and explains the legal basis for the trial court's decision.

Who hears oral arguments in court?

After the defendant and prosecutor have filed their briefs, oral arguments may be scheduled. The oral argument is heard by the appellate court, often a panel of judges , who listen to the attorneys' description of the case and legal issues. Appellate judges may pose questions to the lawyers arguing the appeal.

Where are misdemeanor cases heard?

Some misdemeanor cases may be heard in courts such as a district or municipal court, from which the first appeal is made to a higher level trial court. A small number of states have no intermediate appellate courts, such that once proceedings are concluded at the trial court level an appeal is made directly to the state Supreme Court.

What is the first level of appeal?

In most states, a defendant's first level of appeal is to an intermediate-level appellate court. From there, it is possible to seek leave to appeal to the State Supreme Court. Afterward, it may be possible to seek relief through the federal courts.

What are the grounds for appeal in a criminal case?

Grounds for Appeal. Potential grounds for appeal in a criminal case include legal error, juror misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel. Legal errors may result from improperly admitted evidence, incorrect jury instructions, or lack of sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict.

What happens when a court grants an appeal?

If the appellate court grants the appeal, it may reverse the lower court’s decision in whole or in part.

What is included in the trial record?

The record includes all pre-trial and post-trial motions, all evidence admitted to the court and a word-for-word transcript of the trial. In addition to analyzing the record, appellate courts also review written briefs submitted by each party.

Is the review of appeals in state courts discretionary?

Review of appeals in state’s highest court is discretionary and is limited to only a small percentage of cases. If the defendant can frame the appeal in terms of a federal issue, the defendant may then pursue relief in the federal court system. Defendants convicted initially in a federal trial court may appeal their case directly to ...

Which state has the highest court?

Each state has its own court naming system. In California, the state’s highest court is the California Supreme Court. In New York, the highest court is the New York State Court of Appeals, and the New York State Supreme Court is a trial court. Review of appeals in state’s highest court is discretionary and is limited to only a small percentage ...

What is the process of appellate review?

Process of Appellate Review. If a state court convicts a defendant, the ruling is appealed to an intermediate-level state appellate court. If the defendant is unsuccessful in the intermediate court, the defendant may appeal their conviction to the state’s highest court. Each state has its own court naming system.

What are the common bases for appeal?

Common Bases for Appeal. Legal error. Juror misconduct. Ineffective assistance of counsel. A conviction may also be appealed if the defendant reasonably believes that the jury conducted itself improperly during deliberations or the trial itself.

What are the grounds for dismissal in a criminal case?

Some grounds for dismissal include: lack of probable cause to arrest. an improper criminal complaint or charging document. an illegal stop or search.

How do police arrest people?

A police officer cannot arrest a person simply because he has a gut feeling that the person just robbed the liquor store down the street. The officer must have a reasonable belief based on objective factual circumstances that the person robbed the store. For instance, after the liquor store robbery, an eye witness to the robbery describes the robber to the police officer as a person wearing a red jacket with a dragon emblem and boots and carrying a knife with a long blade and a black handle. If the officer sees a person matching that description hiding in a doorway down the street, he likely has probable cause to arrest.

Can a witness be identified as the person who committed the crime?

Some cases also hinge on a witness being able to identify the defendant as the person who committed the crime. Without the identification, the other evidence might not be strong enough to get a conviction. If a witness realizes after first identifying the defendant that he or she is unsure and not able to to identify the defendant at trial, the prosecutor might decide that, without the witness identification, there is not enough evidence to win at trial and a dismissal is in order.

What happens if a court finds a search was illegal?

If the court finds that a stop or search was illegal and the evidence is inadmissible, the defense can request that the case be dismissed on the grounds that the prosecution has no evidence to prove the charges against the defendant.

What happens if a grand jury finds probable cause?

If the grand jury or the judge do not find probable cause, then the charges must be dismissed. when prosecutors have very limited evidence against a defendant in a criminal case, they may conclude that they do not have enough evidence to move forward in the case and dismiss the charges on their own.

Can a prosecutor edit a complaint?

If the complaint does not comport with state or local law because of a significant error or omission, the prosecutor cannot simply edit the document by hand and submit it to the court. The officer who wrote and signed the complaint, under oath, must make those changes.

What happens if a police officer randomly stops a car?

If an officer randomly stops a person or a car or makes the stop because of the driver's race, the stop is illegal and violates the person's constitutional rights. (Read more about racial profiling and your rights when dealing with the police .)

What should be instituted to ensure that the prosecution function is fairly and effectively carried out?

If a supervisor or judge initially determines that an allegation is serious enough to warrant official investigation, reasonable measures, including possible recusal, should be instituted to ensure that the prosecution function is fairly and effectively carried out.

Who does the prosecutor serve?

The prosecutor generally serves the public and not any particular government agency, law enforcement officer or unit, witness or victim. When investigating or prosecuting a criminal matter, the prosecutor does not represent law enforcement personnel who have worked on the matter and such law enforcement personnel are not the prosecutor’s clients. The public’s interests and views should be determined by the chief prosecutor and designated assistants in the jurisdiction.

Who should receive training in how effectively to supervise?

Individuals who will supervise attorneys or staff should receive training in how effectively to supervise. (d) The prosecutor’s office should also make available opportunities for training and continuing education programs outside the office, including training for non-attorney staff.

What is the meaning of "before the conclusion of all aspects of a matter in which a prosecutor participates

(a) Before the conclusion of all aspects of a matter in which a prosecutor participates, the prosecutor should not enter into any agreement or informal understanding by which the prosecutor acquires an interest in a literary or media portrayal or account based on or arising out of the prosecutor’s involvement in the matter.

Should the prosecutor be allowed to display the accused?

Absent a legitimate law enforcement purpose, the prosecutor should not display the accused for the media, nor should the prosecutor invite media presence during investigative actions without careful consideration of the interests of all involved, including suspects, defendants, and the public.

Should a prosecutor allow personal advancement?

A prosecutor should not allow interests in personal advancement or aggrandizement to affect judgments regarding what is in the best interests of justice in any case.

What are the steps to make a clear record for potential review?

Such steps may include: filing motions including motions for reconsideration, and exhibits; making objections and placing explanations on the record; requesting evidentiary hearings; requesting or objecting to jury instructions; and making offers of proof and proffers of excluded evidence.

What are the criteria for a court appointed attorney?

The justices in Gideon unanimously held that "in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.".

How to determine if you qualify for a free court appointed attorney?

To determine whether you qualify for a free court-appointed attorney, you may have to gather financial documents and prove to the judge that you lack the funds for a private lawyer.

What to do if you can't afford a lawyer?

If you can't afford one, be sure to request a free court-appointed attorney. If you're facing criminal charges, contact a criminal defense attorney near you to obtain an experienced and informed evaluation of your case.

What was the Supreme Court case that established that criminal defendants who are unable to afford a lawyer have a

Wainwright was it established that criminal defendants who are unable to afford a lawyer have a right to free legal representation. Defendants who meet certain low-income criteria are assigned either full-time public defenders or private lawyers appointed by the court.

What is the right to an attorney?

If you've been charged with a criminal offense and lack the resources to hire legal representation, you may be entitled to a court-appointed attorney. The right to an attorney in criminal proceedings is enshrined within the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. However, not until the 1963 Supreme Court case of Gideon v. Wainwright was it established that criminal defendants who are unable to afford a lawyer have a right to free legal representation.

Do court appointed lawyers work for you?

As with privately hired attorneys, court-appointed lawyers are legally obligated to zealously defend their clients' interests. Also, despite the fact that public defenders and other lawyers appointed by the court are paid by the same entity that pays the prosecutors and judges (the government), they work for you.

What are the California DUI laws?

California DUI Laws: What to Expect, Penalties & Laws. The evidence needed to convict a person of a crime is also called the legal burden of proof . However, the weight of the burden of proof varies, depending on whether it is an administrative, civil or criminal court decision.

What is clear and convincing evidence?

"Clear and convincing evidence" requires that the judge or jury believe that, based on the evidence, the facts presented are highly probable or almost certain to be true. Like the preponderance of the evidence standard, clear and convincing evidence does not need to dispel all doubts.

Does clear evidence dispel doubts?

Like the preponderance of the evidence standard, clear and convincing evidence does not need to dispel all doubts. This is the most common standard of proof in civil trials.

What is the unanimous vote in a criminal case?

In criminal cases, most courts (state and federal) require a unanimous vote by the jury to find the defendant guilty.

How many jurors are needed for a criminal trial?

Generally, a criminal trial requires a minimum of 5 or 6 jurors.

Does unanimity have to be found in civil cases?

In civil cases, many states have eliminated the unanimity requirement to find a defendant liable.

What is a military court martial?

Note: Federal military courts-martial, a special form of Article I federal court that enforces criminal actions, allows for a non-unanimous finding of guilty in certain cases.

Is a civil trial a finding of liability?

Many would argue that allowing for a finding of liability in civil trial by a simple majority of jurors is unfair. They would argue that the standard should be unanimous, as in criminal trials. A civil judgment can be detrimental to a person's existence. There is a valid argument that such a decision should not be predicated on a majority, rather than unanimous, jury finding.

What is a simple verdict?

The jury will provide a simple verdict (guilty/not guilty or liable/not liable) and does not have to explain its reasoning in the matter.

Do all civil cases involve jury trials?

Not all civil court cases involve a jury trial.

image