The work product of an attorney includes material produced and obtained by an attorney in his or her professional capacity and with the use of his or her professional skills involving legal reasoning, legal research, analysis, conclusions, legal theory, and strategy.
Full Answer
Ten Things You Need to Know as In-House Counsel®
T he attorney work product doctrine is a relatively recent development in American jurisprudence. While the attorney-client privilege traces its roots to English common law, the work product doctrine was developed in the mid-20th century when courts recognized the need to protect an attorney’s mental thoughts and impressions and thus preserve the attorney’s trial strategy in anticipated or pending litigation.
Opinion work product is the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and/or legal theories of an attorney. An example of attorney opinion work product is an email from the attorney to their client regarding legal research and trial strategy.
Opinion work product is the record of an attorney's mental impressions, ideas or strategies, and is almost never subject to discovery.
The work-product doctrine now encompasses “documents and tangible things that are prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party or its representative,”3 and a party's representative can be its attorney, but it also can be its insurer, employee or other agent.
One critical lesson is that a court generally will afford work product protection to attorney notes, as long as those notes contain “mental impressions or conclusions,” also known as “opinion work product.” Notes that contain purely factual information will, in all likelihood, be subject to discovery.
The duration of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine may differ depending on the court. The attorney-client privilege normally lasts forever; while, the work product doctrine may be limited to the litigation and can be terminated when the litigation ceases.
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947). The work product of an attorney includes material produced and obtained by an attorney in his or her professional capacity and with the use of his or her professional skills involving legal reasoning, legal research, analysis, conclusions, legal theory, and strategy.
The law states that communication between a lawyer and his or her client is only protected if the primary purpose of that communication is to provide legal advice. That means that if a lawyer sent his client business advice in an email, then that email does not fall under attorney-client protection.
Ill. 1972), documents prepared in ordinary course of business and not compiled for an attorney or requested by an attorney could not be protected by the work product privilege.
Under the law, the general rule is that the copyright in and to the work product of an individual employee or independent contractor is owned by that individual unless an exception applies. The “Work for Hire” doctrine is an exception to such rule.
Overcoming the work product privilege. If the court orders discovery of those materials, it must protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of a party's attorney or other representative concerning the litigation.
1. California law recognizes three tiers of attorney work product: absolute, qualified, and derivative. 2. The attorney work product doctrine provides absolute protection to written work product that reveals an attorney's impressions, conclusions, opinions or legal research. 3.
In some ways, the work product doctrine is broader than the attorney-client privilege because its protections are not limited solely to communications or confidential matters.
The work- product doctrine is found at Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 192.5 in Texas cases and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) in federal cases. Work product includes material prepared, mental impressions developed, or communi- cations made “in anticipation of litigation” or for trial.
n. written materials, charts, notes of conversations and investigations, and other materials directed toward preparation of a case or other legal representation. Their importance is that they cannot be required to be introduced in court or otherwise revealed to the other side.
Reardon, claimed that during the hearing, the judge should not have allowed a page from the notes of the defense lawyer at trial to be admitted at the hearing because the notes constitute the attorney's work product.
Legal nurse consultant: a role for nephrology nurses. Though Oklahoma courts have not ruled on this specific fact pattern, the court cited cases showing the weight of authority supports the notion that clients are the legal owners of their case files, including the attorney's work product.
An attorney's work product is very similar to attorney-client privilege, but it broadens the scope of what is protected. If the opposing counsel in a case was able to see everything their adversary prepared for the trial before the trial took place, it would throw off the balance of justice. Over 20 years after the Hickman v.
The legal protection of attorney work product did not fully form until 1947 in the important case of Hickman v. Taylor. Work product doctrine protects the confidentiality of a lawyer's work in preparation for a trial. This includes any tangible or intangible material like: 1 Video and voice recordings 2 Written documents 3 Notes 4 Photographs
Work product doctrine protects the confidentiality of a lawyer's work in preparation for a trial. This includes any tangible or intangible material like: What technically constitutes an attorney's work product is hard to nail down, so enforcing this protection of work product will fall to the ruling of a judge.
Attorney-client privilege is automatically in place when confidential communication is happening between an attorney and their client as the client is seeking legal advice or preparing for a case. The privilege here refers to the legal protection of anything communicated between client and counsel.
To have a better understanding of the two legal concepts keep the following few characteristics in mind: 1.Communication. Communication is a key part of any attorney-client relationship. In order for the attorney-client privilege to be involved there must be some sort of communication between the attorney and the client.
The duration of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine may differ depending on the court. The attorney-client privilege normally lasts forever; while, the work product doctrine may be limited to the litigation and can be terminated when the litigation ceases.
At first glance, you may think the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine are interchangeable and govern the same exact scope of information, but that is not the case. According to the Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, the “ attorney-client privilege refers to a legal privilege that works to keep confidential ...
While the attorney-client privilege seeks to protect confidential communications between an attorney and a client, work product doctrine generally establishes a “zone of privacy” in which a lawyer and a client can prepare and develop theories and strategies in anticipation of, and in preparation for litigation, free from unnecessary intrusion by the adversary.
See Rule of Professional Conduct 4.4(b) (“A lawyer who receives a document relating to the representation of the lawyer's client and knows or reasonably should know that the document was inadvertently sent shall promptly notify the sender. ”).
Not all communications by an attorney and his or her client are covered by the attorney-client privilege. To qualify, the communication must be both confidential and for the purpose of obtaining legal advice. The privilege may not apply, for example, where an attorney acts as a corporate officer, tax preparer, investment advisor, political advisor, public relations advisor, and similar roles.
The work-product doctrine is a judge-created doctrine, and as initially crafted, protected from discovery written statements, private memoranda and personal recollections prepared by an attorney in anticipation of litigation.1 The intention was to create a zone of privacy around the attorney so as to allow the preparation and development of legal theories and strategies with an eye toward litigation, free from unnecessary intrusion by his adversaries.2
Looking at the totality of the situation, the court concluded that a dual-purpose document could nevertheless be subject to work-product protection if the document was created in anticipation of litigation and would not have been created in substantially similar form, but for the prospect of litigation.15