what is an undertaking for advancement of attorney fees

by Leora Wunsch Jr. 10 min read

Advancement is where the company pays the director’s or officer’s attorneys’ fees and costs prior to the final disposition of the litigation, and is sometimes subject to an undertaking to repay the company if it is ultimately determined that indemnification is unwarranted.

This is a form of undertaking by an indemnified party to repay expenses advanced by the indemnifying party. In the undertaking, the indemnified party agrees to repay the funds to the company under certain conditions. ...Sep 11, 2020

Full Answer

What does undertaking mean in a court case?

Advancement of Expenses and Costs. Outside Counsel shall advance all litigation costs, expenses and disbursements, including expert witness fees and costs, deposition costs, and document production. Shreveport shall not advance payment for any services rendered or costs, expenses or disbursements incurred.

What are the ethical restrictions on attorney-client fee arrangements?

amount of the advancement for attorney’s fees is in excess of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) or where the advancement of attorney’s fees would cause a reduction in the claimant’s existing weekly compensation rate of more than thirty-three and one-third percent (33-1/3%). 3.

What is an undertaking with adequate security?

• “Fees on Fees” Incurred in Pursuit of Advancement also Are Recoverable — Rather than just advance the funds to which officers/directors are entitled, corporate employers often endeavor to make the fight over advancement as expensive and burdensome as possible, thereby forcing the officer/director to incur a small fortune in fees and costs just to obtain the advancement that …

What is an undertaking of bail?

time the fee agreement is entered, but also when attorneys bill for services or attempt to collect the fees they are owed by the client. It is therefore possible to violate Rule 1.5 if an attorney seeks to enforce a fee agreement that, while reasonable at the time, was rendered unreasonable by subsequent events.

image

Who is indemnified in Delaware?

Directors and officers who win their cases are indemnified. Under Delaware law, directors and officers “shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person” if they are “successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any claim, issue or matter.”. [2]

Is Delaware a corporate law state?

Many states look to Delaware law on princip les corporate law and corporate governance, but coverage and limitations can vary by state. Directors and officers of non-Delaware entities should confirm the exact entitlements and exceptions under the applicable laws of their respective states.

Is advancement allowed in Delaware?

There is no right to advancement under Delaware law. It is left to the entity. Indemnification can be restricted by law in certain circumstances. Practical considerations regarding D&O policies include risks related to insolvent companies and strategic litigation stresses on shared coverage limits.

What is the rule for a lawyer to accept a referral fee?

Although many While the “joint responsibility” provision may allow a lawyer to accept a “referral fee” even if the lawyer performs no work, such fees come at a cost. As a comment to the rule notes, “joint responsibility ” means financial and ethical responsibility for the representation as if the lawyers were associated in a partnership.” Rule 1.5, Cmt. 7. That means that, if the lawyer accepts the fee, the lawyer may also be jointly responsible

What makes an attorney valuable?

The very factors that make attorneys’ services valuable – their knowledge of the law and the specialized training that leads their clients to place trust in them – lead to special scrutiny of attorneys’ payment relationships. The attorney-client relationship is a fiduciary relationship and, just as in other fiduciary relationship, the attorney’s dealings with the beneficiary – the client – are subject to special legal scrutiny. As one Illinois court has put it: The law places special obligations upon an attorney by virtue of the relationship between attorney and client. Those obligations are summed up and referred to generally as the fiduciary duty of the attorney. They permeate all phases of the relationship, including the contract for payment.

Why do attorneys use retainers?

Attorneys commonly use retainers to secure payment of their legal fees and costs. The word “retainer,” however, has a variety of different meanings – and those different meanings result in different application of the relevant ethical rules.

What are the ABA model rules of professional conduct?

At their outset, the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (referenced herein throughout as the “Model Rules” or, individual, the “Rule”) require lawyers to serve their clients with competence (Rule 1.1), diligence (Rule 1.3) and loyalty – requiring them to avoid, or at least disclose, ways in which the attorney’s interests may conflict with those of the client. See, generally, Model Rules 1.6-1.8. The attorney-client relationship is also commercial, with the attorney typically entitled to demand payment from the client for services rendered. That commercial relationship inherently creates the potential for conflict. No matter how much the client may appreciate the attorney’s work, it would always be in the client’s best interests to avoid paying for it. Similarly, as much as the attorney may be motivated by genuine respect and admiration for the client, the attorney could always be paid more.

What is Rule 1.5?

Under Rule 1.5(a) a lawyer may not “make an agreement for, charge, or collect an unreasonable fee.” By its terms, the rule requires reasonableness to be assessed not only at the time the fee agreement is entered, but also when attorneys bill for services or attempt to collect the fees they are owed by the client. It is therefore possible to violate Rule 1.5 if an attorney seeks to enforce a fee agreement that, while reasonable at the time, was rendered unreasonable by subsequent events. For example, in In re Gerard, 132 Ill.2d 507, 548 N.E.2d 1051 (1989), a lawyer was found to have violated Rule 1.5 after charging a contingency fee based on the value of account assets located for an elderly client. While, at the time the lawyer had been hired, the client had believed accounts were being wrongfully withheld from him, in fact the accounts were not the subject of any adverse claim, but were turned over willingly by the banks holding them once they learned of the client’s whereabouts – requiring little in the way of attorney professional services. More generally, fees are frequently found to be unreasonable when the lawyer does not perform competent work, or neglects a matter, but nevertheless seeks to be paid the full fee for which he or she has contracted. See, e.g., Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Garrett, 427 Md. 209, 224, 46 A.3d 1169, 1178 (2012); Rose v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 425 S.W.3d 889, 891 (Ky. 2014).

Undertaking

A written promise offered as security for the performance of a particular act required in a legal action.

undertaking

in the law of the EUROPEAN UNION, one of the subjects of the law. It covers companies, partnerships and sole traders and is particularly the focus of the COMPETITION POLICY.

image

Entitlement to Indemnification and Advancement

  • In general, directors have rights to indemnification under Delaware law and as provided in the corporation’s governing documents. Directors and officers who win their cases are indemnified. Under Delaware law, directors and officers “shall be indemnified against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person” if they are “successful on the …
See more on corpgov.law.harvard.edu

Notable Exclusions Under Delaware Law

  • While Delaware law gives corporations the option to confer broad indemnification and advancement rights, those rights are not limitless. As described above, directors and officers can never be indemnified for “bad faith” actions. Two other limits are also notable: the derivative settlement exclusion and the “by reason of” limitation. Directors and officers cannot be indemnif…
See more on corpgov.law.harvard.edu

Trends in Derivative Litigation

  • Over the last five to ten years, the number of eight- and nine-figure derivative settlements has increased. Where once it was rare to see a derivative settlement for $50 million, in just the last five years, there has been a rapidly increasing number of high-profile derivative settlements in the hundreds of millions. Just one example would be the $137.5 million settlement in the Freeport-…
See more on corpgov.law.harvard.edu

Practical Considerations For D&O Policies

  • Delaware entities typically purchase D&O policies to cover the costs of indemnification or advancement or to provide coverage where indemnification is unavailable. These policies come with their own considerations. For example, the D&O policies that provide entity coverage may be considered property of the estate for an insolvent company. On the other hand, if a policy “cover…
See more on corpgov.law.harvard.edu